Measuring molecular parity nonconservation using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
James Eills, John W. Blanchard, Lykourgos Bougas, Mikhail G. Kozlov,, Alexander Pines, Dmitry Budker

TL;DR
This paper proposes a novel NMR spectroscopy method to detect molecular parity nonconservation by measuring diastereomeric splittings as a function of enantiomeric excess, setting new experimental constraints on PNC effects.
Contribution
It introduces a new NMR-based experimental approach to measure molecular PNC effects and provides the first constraint on PNC in extsuperscript{13}C chemical shifts.
Findings
Set a new constraint on molecular PNC at 10^{-5} ppm in extsuperscript{13}C resonances.
Demonstrated proof-of-principle experiment using extsuperscript{13}C and extsuperscript{1}H NMR.
Discussed key considerations for future molecular PNC detection using NMR.
Abstract
The weak interaction does not conserve parity and therefore induces energy shifts in chiral enantiomers that should in principle be detectable in molecular spectra. Unfortunately, the magnitude of the expected shifts are small and in spectra of a mixture of enantiomers, the energy shifts are not resolvable. We propose a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiment in which we titrate the chirality (enantiomeric excess) of a solvent and measure the diasteriomeric splitting in the spectra of a chiral solute in order to search for an anomalous offset due to parity nonconservation (PNC). We present a proof-of-principle experiment in which we search for PNC in the \textsuperscript{13}C resonances of small molecules, and use the \textsuperscript{1}H resonances, which are insensitive to PNC, as an internal reference. We set a new constraint on molecular PNC in \textsuperscript{13}C chemical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
