Loss impresses human beings more than gain in the decision-making game
Jia Quan Shen, Luo-Luo Jiang

TL;DR
This study investigates how humans process losses versus gains in decision-making, revealing that losses evoke stronger brain responses than gains, especially as the difference between them increases.
Contribution
It provides neurophysiological evidence that losses impact human decision-making more than gains, highlighting EEG signals associated with loss anticipation.
Findings
Losses evoke stronger EEG responses than gains.
Negative EEG waves are concentrated in the forebrain during high expectation.
The EEG signals differ significantly before different decision outcomes.
Abstract
What happen in the brain when human beings play games with computers? Here a simple zero-sum game was conducted to investigate how people make decision via their brain even they know that their opponent is a computer. There are two choices (a low or high number) for people and also two strategies for the computer (red color or green color). When the number selected by the human subject meet the red color, the person loses the score which is equal to the number. On the contrary, the person gains the number of score if the computer chooses a green color for the number selected by the human being. Both the human subject and the computer give their choice at the same time, and subjects have been told that the computer make its decision randomly on the red color or green color. During the experiments, the signal of electroencephalograph (EEG) obtained from brain of subjects was recorded.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
