Comment on the paper Quantum mechanics needs no consciousness by Yu and Nikolic (2011)
Catherine M Reason

TL;DR
This paper critiques Yu and Nikolic's claim that their experimental setup can falsify the consciousness causes collapse hypothesis in quantum mechanics, clarifying misunderstandings about collapse assumptions.
Contribution
It provides a detailed critique of Yu and Nikolic's argument, clarifying the conditions under which collapse can be assumed in quantum mechanics.
Findings
Yu and Nikolic's experimental setup does not falsify the CCCH.
The confusion arises from misinterpreting collapse conditions.
The critique clarifies the proper understanding of quantum collapse assumptions.
Abstract
This is a brief comment on the paper "Quantum mechanics needs no consciousness" by Shan Yu and Danko Nikolic [1]. Yu and Nikolic argue that the "consciousness causes collapse hypothesis" interpretation of quantum mechanics, or CCCH, can be falsified by a particular experimental setup. This claim is incorrect and the cause of the error appears to be a confusion over where and when a collapse can be assumed to occur.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications
