The Authority of "Fair" in Machine Learning
Michael Skirpan, Micha Gorelick

TL;DR
This paper advocates for a normative, community-inclusive approach to defining fairness in machine learning, reviewing current literature and encouraging broader debate on ethical standards.
Contribution
It introduces a normative framework for fairness in ML and discusses how to incorporate diverse community perspectives into fairness standards.
Findings
Highlights the importance of normative fairness definitions
Reviews current Fair ML literature and its implications
Suggests community engagement for ethical consensus
Abstract
In this paper, we argue for the adoption of a normative definition of fairness within the machine learning community. After characterizing this definition, we review the current literature of Fair ML in light of its implications. We end by suggesting ways to incorporate a broader community and generate further debate around how to decide what is fair in ML.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
