Causal Structure Learning
Christina Heinze-Deml, Marloes H. Maathuis, and Nicolai Meinshausen

TL;DR
This paper reviews methods for learning causal structures from data, emphasizing their assumptions and empirical performance, to improve understanding and decision-making in complex systems.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of recent causal structure learning algorithms and discusses their underlying assumptions and empirical effectiveness.
Findings
Different algorithms have varying assumptions affecting their applicability.
Empirical performance varies across scenarios and methods.
Understanding assumptions is crucial for selecting appropriate causal models.
Abstract
Graphical models can represent a multivariate distribution in a convenient and accessible form as a graph. Causal models can be viewed as a special class of graphical models that not only represent the distribution of the observed system but also the distributions under external interventions. They hence enable predictions under hypothetical interventions, which is important for decision making. The challenging task of learning causal models from data always relies on some underlying assumptions. We discuss several recently proposed structure learning algorithms and their assumptions, and compare their empirical performance under various scenarios.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
