Validation of a smartphone app to map social networks of proximity

TL;DR

This study validates a new smartphone app for mapping social proximity networks by comparing it with sociometric badges and self-reports, highlighting its potential and current limitations in social network research.

Contribution

The paper introduces a smartphone app for proximity data collection and compares its effectiveness to traditional methods, demonstrating its feasibility and areas for improvement.

Findings

Significant association between app and badge proximity data (rho=0.17, p<0.0001).

Networks from the app and self-report are significantly correlated, with lower correlation than badges.

App's scanning rate varies by device and operating system, affecting data accuracy.

Abstract

Social network analysis is a prominent approach to investigate interpersonal relationships. Most studies use self-report data to quantify the connections between participants and construct social networks. In recent years smartphones have been used as an alternative to map networks by assessing the proximity between participants based on Bluetooth and GPS data. While most studies have handed out specially programmed smartphones to study participants, we developed an application for iOS and Android to collect Bluetooth data from participants own smartphones. In this study, we compared the networks estimated with the smartphone app to those obtained from sociometric badges and self-report data. Participants (n=21) installed the app on their phone and wore a sociometric badge during office hours. Proximity data was collected for 4 weeks. A contingency table revealed a significant association between proximity data (rho = 0.17, p<0.0001), but the marginal odds were higher for the app (8.6%) than for the badges (1.3%), indicating that dyads were more often detected by the app. We then compared the networks that were estimated using the proximity and self-report data. All three networks were significantly correlated, although the correlation with self-reported data was lower for the app (rho = 0.25) than for badges (rho = 0.67). The scanning rates of the app varied considerably between devices and was lower on iOS than on Android. The association between the app and the badges increased when the network was estimated between participants whose app recorded more regularly. These findings suggest that the accuracy of proximity networks can be further improved by reducing missing data and restricting the interpersonal distance at which interactions are detected.