# 3D AMR hydrosimulations of a compact source scenario for the Galactic   Centre cloud G2

**Authors:** A. Ballone, M. Schartmann, A. Burkert, S. Gillessen, P. M. Plewa, R., Genzel, O. Pfuhl, F. Eisenhauer, M. Habibi, T. Ott, E. M. George

arXiv: 1706.08547 · 2018-06-13

## TL;DR

This study uses 3D hydrodynamical simulations to explore the nature of G2 in the Galactic Centre, suggesting it could be an outflow from a compact source similar to T Tauri stars, with observable implications.

## Contribution

It presents the first 3D AMR hydrodynamical simulations of G2 as an outflow from a compact source, matching observed properties and predicting future observable signatures.

## Key findings

- G2's properties can be explained by a slow, massive outflow at >100 AU from the source.
- A central dusty source may account for G2's dust compactness.
- Future decoupling of the source from ejected material could confirm the outflow scenario.

## Abstract

The nature of the gaseous and dusty cloud G2 in the Galactic Centre is still under debate. We present three-dimensional hydrodynamical adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) simulations of G2, modeled as an outflow from a "compact source" moving on the observed orbit. The construction of mock position-velocity (PV) diagrams enables a direct comparison with observations and allow us to conclude that the observational properties of the gaseous component of G2 could be matched by a massive ($\dot{M}_\mathrm{w}=5\times 10^{-7} \;M_{\odot} \mathrm{yr^{-1}}$) and slow ($50 \;\mathrm{km \;s^{-1}}$) outflow, as observed for T Tauri stars. In order for this to be true, only the material at larger ($>100 \;\mathrm{AU}$) distances from the source must be actually emitting, otherwise G2 would appear too compact compared to the observed PV diagrams. On the other hand, the presence of a central dusty source might be able to explain the compactness of G2's dust component. In the present scenario, 5-10 years after pericentre the compact source should decouple from the previously ejected material, due to the hydrodynamic interaction of the latter with the surrounding hot and dense atmosphere. In this case, a new outflow should form, ahead of the previous one, which would be the smoking gun evidence for an outflow scenario.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.08547/full.md

## Figures

13 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.08547/full.md

## References

69 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.08547/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.08547