There are no cycles in the $3n+1$ sequence
Ivan Slapnicar

TL;DR
This paper proves that the Collatz sequence has no cycles other than the known trivial cycle using graph theory and linear algebra, supporting the conjecture that all sequences eventually reach 1.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel proof that there are no non-trivial cycles in the Collatz sequence employing graph theoretical and linear algebraic methods.
Findings
No cycles other than the trivial one are possible in the Collatz sequence.
The proof uses graph theory to model the sequence transitions.
Linear algebra techniques confirm the absence of non-trivial cycles.
Abstract
In 1937, Lothar Collatz conjectured that the sequence generated by the rule for odd, for even, starting in any positive integer produces . This is equivalent to (1) there are no cycles except the trivial one, (1-4-2-1), and (2) there is no infinite sequence. We prove (1) using graph theory and linear algebra.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBenford’s Law and Fraud Detection
