# Small-scale Effects of Thermal Inflation on Halo Abundance at High-$z$,   Galaxy Substructure Abundance and 21-cm Power Spectrum

**Authors:** Sungwook E. Hong, Heeseung Zoe, Kyungjin Ahn

arXiv: 1706.08049 · 2017-11-16

## TL;DR

This paper investigates how thermal inflation affects early universe structure formation, highlighting observable signatures in halo abundance and 21-cm power spectrum that can help constrain the thermal inflation scenario.

## Contribution

It identifies specific effects of thermal inflation on matter power spectrum and proposes observational strategies with SKA to test these effects.

## Key findings

- Thermal inflation boosts matter power at specific scales.
- Suppresses minihalo and satellite galaxy formation.
- 21-cm power spectrum observations can constrain thermal inflation models.

## Abstract

We study the impact of thermal inflation on the formation of cosmological structures and present astrophysical observables which can be used to constrain and possibly probe the thermal inflation scenario. These are dark matter halo abundance at high redshifts, satellite galaxy abundance in the Milky Way, and fluctuation in the 21-cm radiation background before the epoch of reionization. The thermal inflation scenario leaves a characteristic signature on the matter power spectrum by boosting the amplitude at a specific wavenumber determined by the number of e-foldings during thermal inflation ($N_{\rm bc}$), and strongly suppressing the amplitude for modes at smaller scales. For a reasonable range of parameter space, one of the consequences is the suppression of minihalo formation at high redshifts and that of satellite galaxies in the Milky Way. While this effect is substantial, it is degenerate with other cosmological or astrophysical effects. The power spectrum of the 21-cm background probes this impact more directly, and its observation may be the best way to constrain the thermal inflation scenario due to the characteristic signature in the power spectrum. The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) in phase 1 (SKA1) has sensitivity large enough to achieve this goal for models with $N_{\rm bc}\gtrsim 26$ if a 10000-hr observation is performed. The final phase SKA, with anticipated sensitivity about an order of magnitude higher, seems more promising and will cover a wider parameter space.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.08049/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.08049/full.md

## References

82 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.08049/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.08049