Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in universal classifications: the example of architecture in UDC
Ana Vukadin, Aida Slavic

TL;DR
This paper examines the difficulties of organizing facets in universal classification systems, using UDC's architecture class as a case study, and compares it with other vocabularies to suggest improvements.
Contribution
It provides an analysis of concept organization challenges in UDC and demonstrates how comparative research can inform facet structure enhancements.
Findings
Identified specific challenges in facet analysis of architecture in UDC.
Compared UDC with Art & Architecture Thesaurus and Bliss Classification.
Suggested potential improvements for UDC facet structure.
Abstract
The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLanguage and Culture · linguistics and terminology studies · Literature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies
