Schwarzschild Black Hole Lives to Fight Another Day - Comment on the paper J. Math. Phys. 50, 042502 (2009) by A. Mitra
Prasun K. Kundu

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous claim that the Schwarzschild black hole's mass must be zero, clarifying that the earlier proof was based on a misunderstanding of coordinate volume elements in differential geometry.
Contribution
It refutes Mitra's incorrect proof regarding the mass of Schwarzschild black holes, emphasizing proper mathematical treatment of coordinate volume elements.
Findings
Mitra's proof is incorrect due to a misunderstanding of coordinate volume elements.
The Schwarzschild black hole's mass parameter does not necessarily vanish.
Proper mathematical analysis invalidates the previous claim.
Abstract
In a comment published several years ago in this Journal [J. Math. Phys. 50, 042502 (2009)] Mitra has claimed to prove that a neutral point particle in general relativity as described by the Schwarzschild metric must have zero gravitational mass, i.e. the mass parameter of a Schwarzschild black hole necessarily vanishes. It is shown that the purported proof is incorrect. The error stems from a basic misunderstanding of the mathematical description of coordinate volume element in a differentiable manifold.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory · Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies · Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
