# Calibration errors in interferometric radio polarimetry

**Authors:** C. A. Hales

arXiv: 1706.06612 · 2017-08-02

## TL;DR

This paper analyzes how different calibration strategies affect residual errors in interferometric radio polarimetry, providing analytic and simulation-based insights to optimize observational approaches.

## Contribution

It offers new analytic derivations and simulations to understand residual calibration errors for various strategies, especially regarding parallactic angle coverage and feed basis.

## Key findings

- 30° parallactic angle coverage suffices for linear feeds like ALMA
- 90° coverage needed in circular feeds when the leakage calibrator's Stokes vector is unknown
- Quantifies previously obscure calibration rules of thumb

## Abstract

Residual calibration errors are difficult to predict in interferometric radio polarimetry because they depend on the employed observational calibration strategy, encompassing the Stokes vector of the calibrator and parallactic angle coverage. This work presents analytic derivations and simulations that enable examination of residual on-axis instrumental leakage and position angle errors for a suite of calibration strategies. The focus is on arrays comprising alt-az antennas with common feeds over which parallactic angle is approximately uniform. The results indicate that calibration schemes requiring parallactic angle coverage in the linear feed basis (e.g. ALMA) need only observe over 30 deg, beyond which no significant improvements in calibration accuracy are obtained. In the circular feed basis (e.g. VLA above 1 GHz), 30 deg is also appropriate when the Stokes vector of the leakage calibrator is known a priori, but this rises to 90 deg when the Stokes vector is unknown. These findings illustrate and quantify concepts that were previously obscure rules of thumb.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.06612/full.md

## Figures

16 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.06612/full.md

## References

17 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.06612/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.06612