# Control-Data Separation with Decentralized Edge Control in Fog-Assisted   Uplink Communications

**Authors:** Jinkyu Kang, Osvaldo Simeone, Joonhyuk Kang, and Shlomo Shamai

arXiv: 1706.06451 · 2017-06-23

## TL;DR

This paper explores a fog-assisted uplink communication architecture with a novel control-data separation split, demonstrating that decentralized edge control combined with centralized data processing enhances performance under mobility.

## Contribution

It introduces the Fog RAN (F-RAN) split, combining decentralized control with centralized data processing, and analyzes its benefits over traditional D-RAN and C-RAN architectures.

## Key findings

- F-RAN outperforms D-RAN and C-RAN in adaptive sum-rate.
- F-RAN provides significant gains with user mobility.
- Decentralized control improves responsiveness to channel variations.

## Abstract

Fog-aided network architectures for 5G systems encompass wireless edge nodes, referred to as remote radio systems (RRSs), as well as remote cloud center (RCC) processors, which are connected to the RRSs via a fronthaul access network. RRSs and RCC are operated via Network Functions Virtualization (NFV), enabling a flexible split of network functionalities that adapts to network parameters such as fronthaul latency and capacity. This work focuses on uplink communications and investigates the cloud-edge allocation of two important network functions, namely the control functionality of rate selection and the data-plane function of decoding. Three functional splits are considered: (i) Distributed Radio Access Network (D-RAN), in which both functions are implemented in a decentralized way at the RRSs, (ii) Cloud RAN (C-RAN), in which instead both functions are carried out centrally at the RCC, and (iii) a new functional split, referred to as Fog RAN (F-RAN), with separate decentralized edge control and centralized cloud data processing. The model under study consists of a time-varying uplink channel in which the RCC has global but delayed channel state information (CSI) due to fronthaul latency, while the RRSs have local but more timely CSI. Using the adaptive sum-rate as the performance criterion, it is concluded that the F-RAN architecture can provide significant gains in the presence of user mobility.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.06451/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.06451/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.06451