# The economical 3-3-1 model revisited

**Authors:** P. V. Dong, D. Q. Phong, D. V. Soa, N. C. Thao

arXiv: 1706.06152 · 2018-09-21

## TL;DR

This paper revisits the economical 3-3-1 model, showing its high-scale constraints, proposing modifications for TeV-scale new physics, and highlighting its implications for neutrino masses, dark matter, and collider tests.

## Contribution

It introduces a modified 3-3-1 model that predicts TeV-scale new physics and naturally accommodates dark matter and neutrino masses with minimal particle content.

## Key findings

- Original model predicts a 1000 TeV scale due to FCNC constraints.
- Modified model predicts TeV-scale new physics accessible at colliders.
- Models accommodate dark matter candidates and neutrino masses with distinct mechanisms.

## Abstract

We show that the economical 3-3-1 model poses a very high new physics scale of the order of 1000~TeV due to the constraint on the flavor-changing neutral current. The implications of the model for neutrino masses, inflation, leptogenesis, and superheavy dark matter are newly recognized. Alternatively, we modify the model by rearranging the third quark generation differently from the first two quark generations, as well as changing the scalar sector. The resultant model now predicts a consistent new physics at TeV scale unlike the previous case and may be fully probed at the current colliders. Particularly, due to the minimal particle contents, the models under consideration manifestly accommodate dark matter candidates and neutrino masses, with novel and distinct production mechanisms. The large flavor-changing neutral currents that come from the ordinary and exotic quark mixings can be avoided due to the approximate $B-L$ symmetry.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.06152/full.md

## References

51 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.06152/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.06152