Comment on "The renormalized superperturbation theory (rSPT) approach to the Anderson model in and out of equilibrium"
A. A. Aligia
TL;DR
This paper clarifies misconceptions about nonequilibrium renormalized perturbation theory (rSPT) and discusses its equilibrium results, emphasizing the importance of accurate theoretical descriptions of the Anderson model.
Contribution
It corrects recent misleading statements about rSPT and provides insights into its application at equilibrium for the Anderson model.
Findings
Clarification of facts about nonequilibrium rSPT
Discussion of equilibrium results using rSPT
Correction of misconceptions in recent literature
Abstract
I present briefly some facts about nonequilibrium renormalized perturbation theory, correcting recent misleading statements in [E. Mu\~noz, F. Zamani, L. Merker, T. A. Costi, and S. Kirchner, Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 807, 092001 (2017)], and discuss some results of this work using rSPT at equilibrium.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Theoretical and Computational Physics · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions