# An Updated 2017 Astrometric Solution for Betelgeuse

## TL;DR

This paper updates the astrometric measurements of Betelgeuse by combining revised Hipparcos data with radio observations, highlighting the importance of accounting for surface inhomogeneities and Cosmic Noise for accurate distance estimation.

## Contribution

It presents a new combined astrometric solution for Betelgeuse using multi-source data and discusses strategies for improving parallax accuracy with future high-resolution interferometry.

## Key findings

- Parallax estimate of 4.51 ± 0.80 mas, corresponding to 222+48-34 pc.
- Radio Cosmic Noise significantly affects astrometric accuracy.
- Updated astrometric solution differs from previous measurements.

## Abstract

We provide an update for the astrometric solution for the Type II supernova progenitor Betelgeuse using the revised Hipparcos Intermediate Astrometric Data (HIAD) of van Leeuwen, combined with existing VLA and new e-MERLIN and ALMA positions. The 2007 Hipparcos refined abscissa measurements required the addition of so-called Cosmic Noise of 2.4 mas to find an acceptable 5-parameter stochastic solution. We find that a measure of radio Cosmic Noise should also be included for the radio positions because surface inhomogeneities exist at a level significant enough to introduce additional intensity centroid uncertainty. Combining the 2007 HIAD with the proper motions based solely on the radio positions leads to a parallax of $\pi = 5.27\pm 0.78$ mas ($190^{+33}_{-25}$ pc), smaller than the Hipparcos 2007 value of $6.56\pm 0.83$ mas ($152^{+22}_{-17}$ pc; van Leeuwen 2007). Furthermore, combining the VLA and new e-MERLIN and ALMA radio positions with the 2007 HIAD, and including radio Cosmic Noise of 2.4 mas, leads to a nominal parallax solution of $4.51 \pm 0.80$ mas ($222^{+48}_{-34}$ pc), which while only $0.7\sigma$ different from the 2008 solution of Harper et al. it is $2.6\sigma$ different from the solution of van Leeuwen. An accurate and precise parallax for Betelgeuse is always going to be difficult to obtain because it is small compared to the stellar angular diameter ($\theta=44$ mas). We outline an observing strategy, utilizing future mm and sub-mm high-spatial resolution interferometry that must be used if substantial improvements in precision and accuracy of the parallax and distance are to be achieved.