Ranking to Learn and Learning to Rank: On the Role of Ranking in Pattern Recognition Applications
Giorgio Roffo

TL;DR
This paper explores the dual roles of ranking in pattern recognition, focusing on how ranking methods improve model accuracy and how learning to rank enhances information retrieval and related applications.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of ranking to learn and learning to rank, highlighting their roles and applications in pattern recognition and machine learning.
Findings
Ranking improves feature selection and classifier accuracy.
Learning to rank enhances information retrieval systems.
Ranking methods increase robustness in real-time systems.
Abstract
The last decade has seen a revolution in the theory and application of machine learning and pattern recognition. Through these advancements, variable ranking has emerged as an active and growing research area and it is now beginning to be applied to many new problems. The rationale behind this fact is that many pattern recognition problems are by nature ranking problems. The main objective of a ranking algorithm is to sort objects according to some criteria, so that, the most relevant items will appear early in the produced result list. Ranking methods can be analyzed from two different methodological perspectives: ranking to learn and learning to rank. The former aims at studying methods and techniques to sort objects for improving the accuracy of a machine learning model. Enhancing a model performance can be challenging at times. For example, in pattern classification tasks, different…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques · Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques · Remote-Sensing Image Classification
