# Intersecting families, cross-intersecting families, and a proof of a   conjecture of Feghali, Johnson and Thomas

**Authors:** Peter Borg

arXiv: 1706.05537 · 2017-06-20

## TL;DR

This paper extends the Erd	ext{o}s-Ko-Rado theorem to cross-intersecting families with weighted sums and proves a conjecture about the structure of maximum intersecting families in certain graphs, specifically depth-two claws.

## Contribution

It generalizes the Erd	ext{o}s-Ko-Rado theorem to weighted sums under specific conditions and confirms a conjecture on maximum intersecting families in depth-two claw graphs.

## Key findings

- Extended Erd	ext{o}s-Ko-Rado theorem to weighted sums for cross-intersecting families.
- Proved the full conjecture of Feghali, Johnson, and Thomas for depth-two claw graphs.
- Established the existence of a vertex with a largest intersecting family in the graph.

## Abstract

A family $\mathcal{A}$ of sets is said to be intersecting if every two sets in $\mathcal{A}$ intersect. Two families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ are said to be cross-intersecting if each set in $\mathcal{A}$ intersects each set in $\mathcal{B}$. For a positive integer $n$, let $[n] = \{1, \dots, n\}$ and $\mathcal{S}_n = \{A \subseteq [n] \colon 1 \in A\}$. In this note, we extend the Erd\H{o}s-Ko-Rado Theorem by showing that if $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ are non-empty cross-intersecting families of subsets of $[n]$, $\mathcal{A}$ is intersecting, and $a_0, a_1, \dots, a_n, b_0, b_1, \dots, b_n$ are non-negative real numbers such that $a_i + b_i \geq a_{n-i} + b_{n-i}$ and $a_{n-i} \geq b_i$ for each $i \leq n/2$, then \[\sum_{A \in \mathcal{A}} a_{|A|} + \sum_{B \in \mathcal{B}} b_{|B|} \leq \sum_{A \in \mathcal{S}_n} a_{|A|} + \sum_{B \in \mathcal{S}_n} b_{|B|}.\] For a graph $G$ and an integer $r$, let ${\mathcal{I}_G}^{(r)}$ denote the family of $r$-element independent sets of $G$. Inspired by a problem of Holroyd and Talbot, Feghali, Johnson and Thomas conjectured that if $r < n$ and $G$ is a depth-two claw with $n$ leaves, then $G$ has a vertex $v$ such that $\{A \in {\mathcal{I}_G}^{(r)} \colon v \in A\}$ is a largest intersecting subfamily of ${\mathcal{I}_G}^{(r)}$. They proved this for $r \leq \frac{n+1}{2}$. We use the result above to prove the full conjecture.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.05537/full.md

## References

29 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.05537/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.05537