This paper investigates the asymptotic behavior of eigenvalues of the Dirichlet Laplacian on narrow, variable-width domains, providing detailed spectral analysis as the domain narrows.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive asymptotic analysis of eigenvalues for the Dirichlet Laplacian on domains with variable width, extending understanding of spectral properties in narrow geometries.
Findings
01
Derived full eigenvalue asymptotics for the Dirichlet Laplacian
02
Analyzed spectral behavior in domains with maximum width at a single point
03
Provided detailed asymptotic formulas for eigenvalues
Abstract
In this paper, we considered the spectrum of the Dirichlet Laplacian Δϵ on Ωϵ={(x,y):−l1<x<l2,0<y<ϵh(x)]} where l1,l2>0 and h(x) is a positive analytic function having 0 the only point where it achieves its global maximum M. In particular we studied in details about the full asymptotics of the eigenvalues.
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpectral Theory in Mathematical Physics · Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering · advanced mathematical theories
In this paper, we considered the spectrum of the Dirichlet Laplacian Δϵ on Ωϵ={(x,y):−l1<x<l2,0<y<ϵh(x)]} where l1,l2>0 and h(x) is a positive analytic function having [math] the only point where it achieves its global maximum M. In particular we studied in details about the full asymptotics of the eigenvalues.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary
1. Introduction
It is very interesting to study the spectrum of Laplace Operator on a thin domain with particular boundary conditions. A nice survey on this topic is by Daniel Grieser [7]. For interesting applications in related mathematical areas see [1], [2], [4]. There are also a lot of applications in mathematical physics as in [9], [10], [11].
For higher dimension situations see [6]. For discussions on the case for Neumann boundary conditions see [8].
This paper is motivated by the work [5] in 2009 where the authors obtained a two-term asymptotics of the eigenvalues for the Dirichlet Laplacian Δϵ in a family of bounded domains Ωϵ={(x,y):−l1<x<l2,0<y<ϵh(x)]} where l1,l2>0 and h(x) is a positive analytic function having [math] the only point where it achieves its global maximum M. With such assumptions on h(x), one easily see h(x)=M−c(x)xm for some even integer m and some positive analytic function c(x) with c(0)=c0=0. The two term asymptotics that was found in [5] is the following:
[TABLE]
where μj are eigenvalues of the operator on L2(R) given by
[TABLE]
and Λj(ϵ) are eigenvalues of the Dirichlet Laplacian Δϵ
with
α1=m+22.
In this paper, we will figure out the formula for the full asymptotics of the eigenvalues Λj(ϵ) as ϵ→0.
2. Main Results
To fix the notation, let Ωϵ={(x,y):−l1<x<l2,0<y<ϵh(x)]} where l1,l2>0 and h(x)=M−c(x)xm is a positive analytic function having [math] the only point achieving the global maximum. And we have the taylor expansion c(x)=c0+∑n=1∞cnxn.
Let Δϵ be the Dirichlet Laplacian on Ωϵ and we are interested in the asymptotic behavior of the spectrum of Δϵ. More precisely, we would consider the following Dirichlet eigenvalue problem
[TABLE]
It is well known that the eigenvalues Λϵ are discrete and tends to infinity. The question we want to solve in this paper is to figure out the full asymptotics of the eigenvalues Λϵ as ϵ→0.
There are three stages in the whole analysis. The starting point of the whole analysis is to restrict the Dirichlet Laplacian Δϵ to a proper closed subspace and turn the whole problem into a perturbation problem. In particular we have the following Lemma.
Lemma 2.1**.**
The Dirichlet eigenvalue problem
[TABLE]
is equivalent to
[TABLE]
where u1=Pu,u2=Qu,A11=PΔϵP,A12=PΔϵQ,A21=QΔϵP,A22=QΔϵQ, with P the othorgonal projection onto
[TABLE]
and Q=I−P.
Following this Lemma 2.1 we study in details about the operator A11 in our second stage. The key idea here is by introducing scaling x=ϵα1y,α1=m+22 one will have
[TABLE]
where H0=−dy2d2+M32π2c0ym is an anharmonic oscillator and Hn is some polynomial in y of degree n+m.
Using resolvent expansion one will have the full asymptotic expansion of the eigenvalues for the operator Hϵ thanks to the exponential decaying of eigenfunctions of H0 and the fact that Hϵ=H0+∑n=1∞Hnϵnα1 defined over H01([−ϵα1l1,ϵα1l2]) can be approximated in a certain sense by Hϵ,K=H0+∑n=1KHnϵnα1 defined over H01(R). In summary the full asymptototics of the eigenvalues λ of the model oeprator A11 is stated in the following Theorem.
Theorem 2.2**.**
Let {μj}j=0∞ be the full set of eigenvalues of H0 defined on H01(R). Then ϵ2α1(A11−M2ϵ2π2) has full eigenvalue asymptotics given by
[TABLE]
where qn can be computed explicitly.
The last stage of the work is trying to understand the difference λ~=Λ−λ between the eigenvalues of the original Dirichlet Laplacian operator Δϵ and the model operator A11. The result is stated as follows.
Theorem 2.3**.**
Let λ be eigenvalues of A11 with normalized eigenfunction ϕ. We also let λ~=Λϵ−λ . Then λ~n→λ~ as n→∞, where
[TABLE]
a0=−⟨u1,ϕ⟩⟨u1,A12(A22−λ)−1A21ϕ⟩,an=−⟨u1,ϕ⟩⟨u1,A12(A22−λ)−n−1A21ϕ⟩* and g(x)=a0+∑n=1∞anxn.*
In this way we have a detailed analysis for the full asymptotics of the Dirichlet Eigenvalues. The following of the paper is organized in the following way. In section 3 we will prove Lemma 2.1 (in Lemma 3.1) and a more concrete version of Theorem 2.2( in Theorem 3.19). In section 4 we will prove Theorem 2.3 ( in Theorem 4.7 and Corollary 4.8).
3. Subspace Reduction & Model Operator
3.1. Subspace Reduction
Due to the adiabatic nature of the problem let’s consider the following subspace of H01(Ωϵ),
[TABLE]
where H01(Ωϵ) is the usual Sobolev Space which is also the natural domain of our Dirichlet Laplacian and H01([−l1,l2]) is also the Sobolev Space as usual.
It is clear that Lϵ is a closed linear subspace of H01(Ωϵ). Let P be the orthogonal projection onto Lϵ. We also let Q be the orthogonal projection onto the complement of Lϵ. Then clearly P+Q=I.
With these projections P and Q, we have a decomposition of our Dirichlet Laplacian as follows:
[TABLE]
where A11=PΔϵP,A12=PΔϵQ,A21=QΔϵP and A22=QΔϵQ.
This decomposition allows us to rephrase our original eigenvalue problem as an equivalent one shown by the following lemma.
Lemma 3.1**.**
The Dirichlet eigenvalue problem
[TABLE]
is equivalent to
[TABLE]
where u1=Pu,u2=Qu,A11=PΔϵP,A12=PΔϵQ,A21=QΔϵP,A22=QΔϵQ, with P the othorgonal projection onto
[TABLE]
and Q=I−P.
Proof.
Follows directly from definition.
∎
3.2. Model Operator
In this section, we will give an explicit formula for A11 with which we are going to study the eigenvalue asymptotics for A11.
Recall that A11=PΔϵP and P is orthogonal projection onto the closed subspace Lϵ.
Theorem 3.2** (Explicit Formula of A11).**
[TABLE]
Proof.
Notice the energy form associated with A11 is
[TABLE]
where ⟨⋅,⋅⟩ represents the L2 inner product.
Now assume Pu=χ(x)ϵh(x)2sin(ϵh(x)πy), then
[TABLE]
where I=[−l1,l2]. Clearly the associated differential operator is
[TABLE]
defined on H01(I) with Dirichlet Boundary condition.
∎
It’s known that spectrum of A11 consists only eigenvalues. Clearly they depend on ϵ. Now we will look at the dependence on ϵ. More precisely we will find the full aymptotics of the eigenvalues.
It follows from Theorem 3.2 that E(u)≥ϵ2M2π2∣∣u∣∣L2(Lϵ), which gives the bottom of the spectrum. It is convenient to subtract the bottom of the spectrum from the engery form to get the following associated differential operator
[TABLE]
on H01(I) with Dirichlet Boundary condition. Clearly Aϵ=A11−ϵ2M2π2.
Lemma 3.3**.**
Let σ(A11) be the spectrum of A11, let σ(Aϵ) be the spectrum of Aϵ. Then σ(Aϵ)=σ(A11)−ϵ2M2π2.
Proof.
The proof follows directly by noticing the spectrum of both operators is discrete, consisting only eigenvalues.
∎
Now we are going to study the eigenvalues of our modle operator Aϵ in details. To show the ideas clearly and hence avoiding techinical complications, we will consider in subsection 3.3 the case h(x)=M−c0xm where c0 is a constant and defer the general case h(x)=M−c(x)xm to subsection 3.4, however the proof as we shall see goes parallely.
3.3. Case 1: h(x)=M−c0xm
The main idea involved in finding the full asymptotics for the eigenvalues of Aϵ is to introduce a proper scaling. This is stated in the following Lemma.
Lemma 3.4**.**
Let x=ϵα1y where α1=m+22,y∈Iϵ=[−ϵα1l1,ϵα1l2], then
Aϵ* is unitarily equivalent to Hϵ=H0+∑n=1∞Hnϵnα*
with α=mα1=m+22m,a0=M2π2,a1=Mc0,a=(3π2+41)π2m2c02 and
H0=−dy2d2+2a0a1ym,Hn=(n+2)a0a1n+1ynm+m+(n−1)aa0a1n−2ynm−2 are polynomial in y of degree nm+m.
Proof.
Notice that h(x)=M−cxm and ϵ2h2π2=M2ϵ2π2[∑n=1∞n(Mcxm)n−1], so we have
[TABLE]
Buy introducing x=ϵα1y where α1=m+22,y∈Iϵ=[−ϵα1l1,ϵα1l2], we see that
[TABLE]
Now let α=mα1=m+22m,a0=M2π2,a1=Mc0,a=(3π2+41)π2m2c02. Then
[TABLE]
∎
The proof of Lemma 3.4 above also shows the following.
Lemma 3.5**.**
Let σ(Hϵ) be the spectrum of Hϵ, then σ(Aϵ)=ϵ2α11σ(Hϵ).
Proof.
The proof follows from the fact that the spectrum of both operators are discrete and also the computation in proving Lemma 3.4.
∎
Hence to figure out the asymptotics for Aϵ we need to understand the asymptotics of eigenvalues of Hϵ. To study Hϵ there are two major observations. The first is that as ϵ→0, Iϵ→R. The second is that H0=−dy2d2+2a0a1ym initially defined on Iϵ can actually be viewed as the anharmonic oscillator H~0=−dy2d2+2a0a1ym restricted to Iϵ. With these two oberservations one might expect perturbation theory around H~0 might give us a satisfactory result on studing the eignvalue asymptotics of Hϵ. For further discussion, let H~n=(n+2)a0a1n+1ynm+m+(n−1)aa0a1n−2ynm−2 which is the same as Hn except that H~n is defined on R. We also let Hϵ,K=H~0+∑n=1KH~nϵnα.
Lemma 3.6**.**
Let {μj}j=0∞ be the full set of eigenvalues of H~0 defined on H01(R) with corresponding eigenfunctions {ψj}j=0∞.
Let λ(Hϵ,K) be the eigenvalue for Hϵ,K=H~0+∑n=1KH~nϵnα defined on H01(R) near μj with corresponding normalized eigenvector ϕϵ,K. Then
[TABLE]
*where
*
[TABLE]
and Γ={λ:∣λ−μj∣=δ} any closed curve enclosing μj and inside which Hϵ,K has single eigenvalue.
Proof.
Regular Perturbation Theory. See Appendix.
∎
We also show that the eigenfuctions ϕϵ,K of Hϵ,K is decaying exponentially fast in the next Lemma.
Lemma 3.7**.**
Let V be a positive C∞ function on R and let H=−Δ+V. Suppose that ψ is an eigenfunction of H. Then if V(x)≥s∣x∣2−t for some s and t, then for every ϵ>0, there is a D such that for all x
we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
Reed-Simon Volumn 4, Page 252.
∎
Corollary 3.8**.**
Let Hϵ,K=H~0+∑n=1KH~nϵnα defined on R where
[TABLE]
Let λ(Hϵ,K) be the eigenvalue for Hϵ,K with corresponding normalized eigenvector ϕϵ,K.Then there exists a D such that for all x we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
Direct application of Lemma 3.7 with s=2a0a1.
∎
With the eigenfunction ϕϵ,K we construct the following test function ϕK that will be used in proving our main result. The construction is stated in the following Lemma.
Lemma 3.9**.**
Let ϕK=ϕϵ,K⋅fδ, where fδ(x)={10\mboxifx∈[−ϵα1l1+δ,ϵα1l2−δ]\mboxifx∈/[−ϵα1l1,ϵα1l2] and fδ(x)∈C∞(R),1≥fδ(x)≥0. Then
[TABLE]
Proof.
[TABLE]
where Iϵ,δ=[−ϵα1l1+δ,ϵα1l2−δ]
On the other hand
[TABLE]
∎
Now we can state the main results in the following theorem about the full eigenvalue asymptotics of Hϵ=H0+∑n=1∞Hnϵnα defined over H01(Iϵ).
Theorem 3.10**.**
Let {μj}j=0∞ be the full set of eigenvalues of H~0=−dy2d2+2a0a1ym defined on H01(R) with corresponding eigenfunctions {ψj}j=0∞. Then the perturbed eigenvalue ν for Hϵ around μj has asymptotic expansion given by
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
with Γ={λ:∣λ−μj∣=δ} any closed curve enclosing μ0 and inside which Hϵ has single eigenvalue and ansk=⟨Hnψs,ψk⟩.
Corollary 3.11**.**
[TABLE]
Before proving this Theorem 3.10. The following observation is important.
Lemma 3.12**.**
[TABLE]
Proof.
[TABLE]
∎
Proof.
(Proof of Theorem 3.10) The main idea involved in proving the Theorem is to show that for all K,
[TABLE]
Then by the self adjointness of the Hϵ, we have
[TABLE]
Now we will prove (3.4) as follows. Using Lemma 3.12
[TABLE]
Notice now that ∣∣ϕϵ,Kfδ′′∣∣+∣∣2ϕϵ,K′fδ′∣∣→0 when δ→0 by absolute continuity and the fact that fδ is supported on [−ϵ1αl1,−ϵ1αl1+δ]∪[ϵ1αl2−δ,ϵ1αl2]. So to prove the theorem, it suffices to show ∣∣(Hϵ−Hϵ,K)ϕK∣∣=O(ϵ(K+1)α).
In fact, because Hϵ is defined on Iϵ=[−ϵα1l1,ϵα1l2], we have that
[TABLE]
And notice
[TABLE]
where C is some constant depending only on K,a,a0,a1 and q. We also notice from Corollary 3.8 that
[TABLE]
Most importantly the bound here is not involving ϵ.
Thus
[TABLE]
In conclusion we just showed that
ν∼μj+∑n=1∞qnϵnα.
∎
3.4. Case 2: h(x)=M−c(x)xm
The situation for the general case h(x)=M−c(x)xm is very much similar to the previous case. For later discussion let’s recall c(x)=∑n=0∞cnxn is analytic. Because of that we also have the following analytic functions
[TABLE]
and with the convention that tj=0 for all the negative indicies with tj being any of those coefficients in the expansions above. And for simplification of the notations, all the notations will be understood within the context of this section 3.4 and should not be viewed as conflicted with the same notations in other sections.
This general case is very much similar as the Case 1 in the sense that the results are parallel to the previous case.
First by introducing a proper scaling we transformed Aϵ=A11−ϵ2M2π2 unitarily to Hϵ as below.
Lemma 3.13**.**
Let x=ϵα1y where α1=m+22,y∈Iϵ=[−ϵα1l1,ϵα1l2], then
Aϵ* is unitarily equivalent to Hϵ=H0+∑n=1∞Hnϵnα*
with a0=M2π2 and H0=−dy2d2+2a0a1ym,
[TABLE]
where γj=A1djyj+A2fj−1yj−1+A3gj−2yj−2 and A1=(3π2+41)π2m2(n−1)a0,A2=M22m(3π2+41)(n−1),A3=(3π2+41)(n−1)M21 are some pure constants.
Proof.
The proof is similar as Lemma 3.4. And it is contained in Appendix.
∎
Secondly H0=−dy2d2+2a0a1ym initially defined on Iϵ can actually be viewed as the anharmonic oscillator H~0=−dy2d2+2a0a1ym restricted to Iϵ. With this oberservation one might expect perturbation theory around H~0 might give us a satisfactory result on studing the eignvalue asymptotics of Hϵ. For further discussion, let H~n=Hn which is the same polynomial in y of degree n+m as Hn except that H~n is defined on R. We also let Hϵ,K=H~0+∑n=1KH~nϵnα1.
Lemma 3.14**.**
Let {μj}j=0∞ be the full set of eigenvalues of H~0 defined on H01(R) with corresponding eigenfunctions {ψj}j=0∞.
Let λ(Hϵ,K) be the eigenvalue for Hϵ,K=H~0+∑n=1KH~nϵnα defined on H01(R) near μj with corresponding normalized eigenvector ϕϵ,K.
Then
[TABLE]
*where
*
[TABLE]
and Γ={λ:∣λ−μj∣=δ} any closed curve enclosing μj and inside which Hϵ,K has single eigenvalue.
Proof.
The proof is similar as Lemma 3.6 by doing Regular Perturbation Theory. See Appendix.
∎
We also show that the eigenfuctions ϕϵ,K of Hϵ,K is decaying exponentially fast in the next Lemma.
Lemma 3.15**.**
Let Hϵ,K=H0+∑n=1KHnϵnα1 defined on R where
[TABLE]
Let λ(Hϵ,K) be the eigenvalue for Hϵ,K with corresponding normalized eigenvector ϕϵ,K.Then there exists a D such that for all x we have
[TABLE]
where a1=Mc0.
Proof.
Direct application of Lemma 3.7 with c=2a0a1 where a1=Mc0.
∎
With the eigenfunction ϕϵ,K we construct the following test function ϕK that will be used in proving our main result as below.
Lemma 3.16**.**
Let ϕK=ϕϵ,K⋅fδ, where fδ(x)={10\mboxifx∈[−ϵα1l1+δ,ϵα1l2−δ]\mboxifx∈/[−ϵα1l1,ϵα1l2] and fδ(x)∈C∞(R),1≥fδ(x)≥0. Then
[TABLE]
Proof.
The proof is the same as Lemma 3.9.
∎
Now we are ready to state the main results about the full eigenvalue asymptotics of Hϵ=H0+∑n=1∞Hnϵnα defined over H01(Iϵ).
Theorem 3.17**.**
Let {μj}j=0∞ be the full set of eigenvalues of H~0=−dy2d2+2a0a1ym defined on H01(R) with corresponding eigenfunctions {ψj}j=0∞. Then the perturbed eigenvalue ν for Hϵ around μj has asymptotic expansion given by
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
with Γ={λ:∣λ−μj∣=δ} any closed curve enclosing μj and inside which Hϵ has single eigenvalue and ansk=⟨Hnψs,ψk⟩.
Before proving this Theorem 3.17. The following observation is important.
Lemma 3.18**.**
[TABLE]
Proof.
[TABLE]
∎
Proof.
(Proof of Theorem 3.17) The main idea involved in proving the Theorem is to show that for all K,
[TABLE]
Then by the self adjointness of the Hϵ, we have
[TABLE]
Now we will prove (3.7) as follows. Using Lemma 3.18
[TABLE]
Notice now that ∣∣ϕϵ,Kfδ′′∣∣+∣∣2ϕϵ,K′fδ′∣∣→0 when δ→0 by absolute continuity and the fact that fδ is supported on [−ϵ1αl1,−ϵ1αl1+δ]∪[ϵ1αl2−δ,ϵ1αl2]. So to prove the theorem, it suffices to show ∣∣(Hϵ−Hϵ,K)ϕK∣∣=O(ϵ(K+1)α1).
And notice from analyticity in ϵ we have
[TABLE]
where C is some constant not depending on ϵ. But we also notice from Lemma 3.16 that
[TABLE]
Most importantly the bound here is not involving ϵ.
In conclusion we just showed that
ν∼μj+∑n=1∞qnϵnα1.
∎
In summary we have the following result about full asymptotics of our model operator A11.
Theorem 3.19**.**
Let {μj}j=0∞ be the full set of eigenvalues of H~0 defined on H01(R). Then ϵ2α1(A11−M2ϵ2π2) has full eigenvalue asymptotics given by
[TABLE]
where qn can be computed explicitly.
Proof.
Follows directly from Theorem 3.18 and Lemma 3.5.
∎
4. Study of Difference λ~=Λϵ−λ
In the previous sections we studied in details about the asymptotics of the eigenvalue of A11. More precisely we showed ϵ2α1[A11−M2ϵ2π2] has eigenvalue asymptotics ν∼μ0+∑n=1∞qnϵnα1. To go back to the full asymptotics of Dirichelt Laplacian, we only need to figure out the difference λ~=Λ−λ between the eigenvalues Λ of the original operator and the eigenvalues λ of the model operator A11. For later discussions let λ be the eigenvalues of A11 with corresponding normalized eigenfunction ϕ. Then A11ϕ=λϕ.
For the rest of the paper in section 4.1 we will derive the equation that is satisfied by λ~ and in section 4.2 we will derive an iterative scheme for solving the equation.
4.1. Equation of λ~
To get the equation for λ~, recall from Lemma 3.1, we have
[TABLE]
where u1=Pu,u2=Qu. The two functions u1 and u2 are actually connected as shown in the following Lemma.
Lemma 4.1**.**
[TABLE]
Proof.
From (4.1) we have
[TABLE]
Using (4.3) iteratively, we have
[TABLE]
Inside the proof there are two things that should be explained more, namely the invertibility of (A22−λ) and the invertibility of
I−λ~(A22−λ)−1.
(A22−λ) is invertible because of the following observations. First we already see that λ∼M2ϵ2π2. Using variational characterization (Energy Estimate) one easily see that the spectrum of A22=QΔϵQ is bounded below by M2ϵ24π2. More precisely one can show ⟨v,v⟩⟨A22v,v⟩≥ϵ2M24π2,∀v∈L2(Ωϵ).
So λ is away from the spectrum of A22. And this particularly implies that (A22−λ) is invertible. Moreover one have
[TABLE]
for some pure constant C.
I−λ~(A22−λ)−1 is invertible for the following reasons. In the work [5], the authors proved
[TABLE]
And we also proved that in Theorem 3.19 that
[TABLE]
Combine (4.4) and (4.5) we have
[TABLE]
namely
[TABLE]
Recall α1=m+22≤21 since m is even integer. So the fact ∣∣(A22−λ)−1∣∣≤Cϵ2 combined with (4.6) will guarantee that ∣∣λ~(A22−λ)−1∣<1 as ϵ→0. And this shows I−λ~(A22−λ)−1 is invertible and one even have the Neumann Expansion.
[TABLE]
∎
Now we can state the equation that is satisfied by λ~.
Lemma 4.2** (Equation for λ~).**
Let ϕ be the normalized eigenfunctions of A11ϕ=λϕ. Then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Notice
[TABLE]
Using (4.2), we have
[TABLE]
namely
[TABLE]
Then by self-adjointness we have
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
∎
For later discussions, let
a0=−⟨u1,ϕ⟩⟨u1,A12(A22−λ)−1A21ϕ⟩,an=−⟨u1,ϕ⟩⟨u1,A12(A22−λ)−n−1A21ϕ⟩ and g(x)=a0+∑n=1∞anxn. Then we saw in Lemma 4.2 that the equation for λ~ is just
[TABLE]
Clearly λ~ is a fixed point of the map g(x). And in the next section we are going to show g(x) is a contraction map and as a corallary we will have an iterative scheme for solving λ~.
4.2. Iterative Scheme for Solving λ~
In this section we will show g(x)=a0+∑n=1∞anxn
is a contraction map. And we will also give the iterative scheme for solving λ~.
Before we do the main estimates about the coefficients an we want to understand the operator A21 in more details.
Lemma 4.5**.**
Let f(x,y)=χ(x)ϵh(x)2sin(ϵh(x)πy)∈Lϵ, then for some pure constant C and D we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
By direct computation and see Appendix.
∎
Now we prove a key Lemma which played an essential role in estimating the coefficients an.
Lemma 4.6**.**
∣∣⟨u1,ϕ⟩∣∣∣∣A21u1∣∣⋅∣∣A21ϕ∣∣=O(ϵ2α11).
Proof.
Notice ϕ∈Lϵ, we can let ϕ=χ(x)ϵh(x)2sin(ϵh(x)πy) for some χ(x). Then A11ϕ=λϕ is equivalent to
[TABLE]
namely −χ′′=[λ−ϵ2h2π2−(3π2+41)h2h′2]χ.
In particular, it implies that
[TABLE]
since we have shown λ−ϵ2M2π2∼ϵ2α1μ in Theorem 3.19 (One can also refer to the two term asymptotics in [5]) where μ are eigenvalues of the operator on L2(R) given by −dx2d2+q(x) where q(x)=2π2M−3cxm.
So from Lemma 4.5, we have
[TABLE]
Indeed we just showed that all the eigenfunctions of A11 would have similar estimate. In fact, let’s assume {ξj}j=0∞ be all the normalized eigenfunctions of A11 with corresponding eigenvalues {λj}. Then
[TABLE]
But we know {ξj} form a complete basis for Lϵ. In particular, this allows us to show ∣∣u1∣∣∣∣A21u1∣∣=O(ϵα11). Indeed
Let xj=⟨u1,ξj⟩. Then u1=∑j=0∞xjξj, ∣∣u1∣∣2=∑jxj2<∞, and we also have ∣∣A112u1∣∣2=∑j=0∞(λj2xj)2=∑j=0∞λj4xj2<∞. Moreover,
[TABLE]
where p,q are any positive conjugates, namely p1+q1=1. And in the last inequality we are using classical inequality:
uv≤pup+vvq for u,v>0.
For our argument, let’s fix p=4,q=34.
So we just showed
[TABLE]
But notice μj≤ϵ2α1λj and ∑j∣λj2xj∣4<∞ as ∑j=0∞(λj2xj)2=∣∣A112u1∣∣2<∞,
So
[TABLE]
Also notice ∑jλj21<∞ since λj1∼μj1∼j1.
In conclusion, for ∀γ>0,∃N, such that 41∑j=N∞∣μj2xj∣4<γ. In particular, this implies 41∑j=N∞∣μj2xj∣4+43∑j=0∞μj21≤Γ for some constant Γ which does not depend on ϵ.
Thus
[TABLE]
Now let μ∗=max{μ0,μ1,⋯,μN−1}. Clearly μ∗ does not depend on ϵ.
Then
[TABLE]
In particualr, we have ∣∣u1∣∣∣∣A21u1∣∣=O(ϵα11).
To finish the proof, one simply need to notice in Corollary 4.4 we have
[TABLE]
And in summary, we just showed that
∣∣⟨u1,ϕ⟩∣∣∣∣A21u1∣∣⋅∣∣A21ϕ∣∣=O(ϵ2α11).
∎
Now we are ready to show that g(x)=a0+∑n=1∞anxn is a contraction.
Theorem 4.7**.**
g(x)=a0+∑n=1∞anxn* where*
[TABLE]
is a contraction.
Notice
[TABLE]
Easy to see that ⟨v,v⟩⟨A22v,v⟩≥ϵ2M24π2,∀v∈L2(Ωϵ).
This implies ∣∣(A22−λ)−1∣∣≤Cϵ2,∣∣(A22−λ)−n−1∣∣≤(Cϵ2)(n+1) for some constant C, which does not depend on ϵ, in particlular we have
[TABLE]
Claim :
(1)
g(x)* has convergence radius less than *Cϵ2.
2. (2)
g′(x)=∑n=1∞nanxn−1* satisfy ∣g′(x)∣<21 for any x inside the radius of convergence when ϵ is small enough.*
Proof of the Claim:
(1)
limn→∞n∣aan∣≤Cϵ2.**
2. (2)
[TABLE]
Now using Lemma 4.6 we have
[TABLE]
So ∣g′(x)∣→0 as ϵ→0.
With the claim we see that g(x) is indeed a contraction.
Corollary 4.8**.**
Let λ be eigenvalues of A11 with normalized eigenfunction ϕ. We also let λ~=Λϵ−λ . Then λ~n→λ~ as n→∞, where
[TABLE]
a0=−⟨u1,ϕ⟩⟨u1,A12(A22−λ)−1A21ϕ⟩,an=−⟨u1,ϕ⟩⟨u1,A12(A22−λ)−n−1A21ϕ⟩* and g(x)=a0+∑n=1∞anxn.*
Proof.
Recall Lemma 4.2 where we show that λ~=g(λ~). So the corollary follows directly from Theorem 4.7 where we showed that g(x) is a contraction.
∎
Acknowledgement
The author would like to thank Prof Leonid Friedlander for a lot of helpful discussions while preparing this paper as part of the dissertation work.
Appendix of Proof of Lemmas
4.3. Proof of Lemma 3.6
Proof.
[TABLE]
Hence we have
[TABLE]
The main reason for the last equality is that Hϵ,K is analytic family of type B perturbation of H0.
∎
4.4. Proof of Lemma 3.13
Proof.
Taylor Expansion. More precisely, notice that h(x)=M−cxm and ϵ2h2π2=M2ϵ2π2[∑n=1∞n(Mcxm)n−1], so we have
[TABLE]
Buy introducing x=ϵα1y where α1=m+22,y∈Iϵ=[−ϵα1l1,ϵα1l2], we see that
[TABLE]
with b1=(3π2+41)M22mc(ϵα1y)c′(ϵα1y),b2=(3π2+41)M2c′2(ϵα1y), α=mα1=m+22m,a0=M2π2,a1=Mc(ϵα1y)a=(3π2+41)π2m2c2(ϵα1y) and
[TABLE]
where γj=A1djyj+A2fj−1yj−1+A3gj−2yj−2.
∎
4.5. Proof of Lemma 3.14
Proof.
[TABLE]
Hence we have
[TABLE]
The main reason for the last equality is that Hϵ,K is analytic family of type B perturbation of H0.
∎
4.6. Proof of Lemma 4.5
Lemma 4.9**.**
(Explicit Computation of A21)
Let f(x,y)=χ(x)ϵh(x)2sin(ϵh(x)πy)∈Lϵ, we also let g(x,y)=ϵh(x)2sin(ϵh(x)πy), then
[TABLE]
Proof.
By computation we have
(1)
Δf=χ′′g+χg′′+2χ′g′+χ(ϵhπ)2g
2. (2)
[TABLE]
3. (3)
[TABLE]
4. (4)
we also have
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
∎
Bibliography13
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
1[1] Y. Colin de Verdière. Sur la multiplicité de la première valeur propre non nulle du Laplacien . Comment. Math. Helv., 61:254–270, 1986.
2[2] Y. Colin de Verdière. Construction de laplaciens dont une partie finie du spectre est donnée . Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér., 20:599–615, 1987.
3[3] E.B. Davies. Spectral theory and differential operators . Cambridge Univ. Press (1995) MR 1349825/Zbl 0893.47004.
4[4] P. Exner and O. Post. Convergence of spectra of graph-like thin manifolds . J. Geom. Phys., 54(1):77–115, 2005.
5[5] L. Friedlander and M. Solomyak. On the spectrum of the Dirichlet Laplacian in a narrow strip . Israel J. Math., 170, 337–354(2009).
6[6] P. Freitas and D. Borisov Asymptotics of Dirichlet eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the Laplacian on thin domains in 𝐑 d superscript 𝐑 𝑑 \mathbf{R}^{d} . J. Funct. Anal. 258 (2010), 893-912.
7[7] D. Grieser. Thin tubes in mathematical physics, global analysis and spectral geometry . in: Analysis on Graphs and its Applications. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, P. Exner, J. Keating, P. Kuchment, T. Sunada, and A. Teplyaev (eds.), AMS, 2008, 565-594.
8[8] D. Jerison. Locating the first nodal line in the Neumann problem. . Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 352(5):2301–2317, 2000.