# Epidemiology of Objectively Measured Bedtime and Chronotype in the US   adolescents and adults: NHANES 2003-2006

**Authors:** Jacek K. Urbanek, Adam Spira, Junrui Di, Andrew Leroux, Ciprian, Crainiceanu, Vadim Zipunnikov

arXiv: 1706.05416 · 2017-06-20

## TL;DR

This study introduces an objective method to estimate bedtime and chronotype using accelerometer data from a large U.S. sample, revealing how these sleep patterns vary with age, sex, and day of the week.

## Contribution

It presents a novel approach for objectively measuring in-bed intervals and chronotype in a large, representative population using accelerometer data from NHANES.

## Key findings

- Average chronotype varies significantly with age.
- Weekend and weekday bedtimes differ notably.
- The method aligns with self-reported chronotype estimates.

## Abstract

Background: We propose a method for estimating the timing of in-bed intervals using objective data in a large representative U.S. sample, and quantify the association between these intervals and age, sex, and day of the week. Methods: The study included 11,951 participants six years and older from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2006, who wore accelerometers to measure physical activity for seven consecutive days. Participants were instructed to remove the device just before the nighttime sleep period and put it back on immediately after. This nighttime period of non-wear was defined in this paper as the objective bedtime (OBT), an objectively estimated record of the in-bed-interval. For each night of the week, we estimated two measures: the duration of the OBT (OBT-D) and, as a measure of the chronotype, the midpoint of the OBT (OBT-M). We estimated day-of-the-week-specific OBT-D and OBT-M using gender-specific population percentile curves. Differences in OBT-M (chronotype) and OBT-D (the amount of time spent in bed) by age and sex were estimated using regression models. Results: The estimates of OBT-M and their differences among age groups were consistent with the estimates of chronotype obtained via self-report in European populations. The average OBT-M varied significantly by age, while OBT-D was less variable with age. The most pronounced differences were observed between OBT-M of weekday and weekend nights. Conclusions: The proposed measures, OBT-D and OBT-M, provide useful information of time in bed and chronotype in NHANES 2003-2006. They identify within-week patterns of bedtime and can be used to study associations between the bedtime and the large number of health outcomes collected in NHANES 2003-2006.

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.05416