# Isospin breaking corrections to meson masses and the hadronic vacuum   polarization: a comparative study

**Authors:** P. Boyle, V. G\"ulpers, J. Harrison, A. J\"uttner, C. Lehner, A., Portelli, C. T. Sachrajda

arXiv: 1706.05293 · 2017-10-25

## TL;DR

This study computes isospin breaking and QED corrections to meson masses and the hadronic vacuum polarization using lattice QCD, comparing stochastic and perturbative methods to evaluate their precision and computational efficiency.

## Contribution

It presents a comparative analysis of stochastic and perturbative approaches for including QED effects in lattice QCD calculations of meson properties.

## Key findings

- Electromagnetic correction to muon g-2 is under 1% for up quark and 0.1% for strange quark.
- Comparison of methods shows differences in precision and computational cost.
- Results obtained with unphysical light quark masses, indicating scope for further physical-mass studies.

## Abstract

We calculate the strong isospin breaking and QED corrections to meson masses and the hadronic vacuum polarization in an exploratory study on a $64\times24^3$ lattice with an inverse lattice spacing of $a^{-1}=1.78$ GeV and an isospin symmetric pion mass of $m_\pi=340$ MeV. We include QED in an electro-quenched setup using two different methods, a stochastic and a perturbative approach. We find that the electromagnetic correction to the leading hadronic contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon is smaller than $1\%$ for the up quark and $0.1\%$ for the strange quark, although it should be noted that this is obtained using unphysical light quark masses. In addition to the results themselves, we compare the precision which can be reached for the same computational cost using each method. Such a comparison is also made for the meson electromagnetic mass-splittings.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.05293/full.md

## Figures

42 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.05293/full.md

## References

66 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.05293/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1706.05293