Target Curricula via Selection of Minimum Feature Sets: a Case Study in Boolean Networks
Shannon Fenn, Pablo Moscato

TL;DR
This paper explores how curriculum learning, based on target difficulty and hierarchical dependencies, improves Boolean network models' accuracy in multi-label classification tasks, including real-world and gene regulatory network problems.
Contribution
It introduces a method to enforce target curricula using hierarchical loss functions and a simple a-priori approach based on intrinsic dimension for Boolean models.
Findings
Hierarchical curricula significantly reduce out-of-sample error.
Emphasizing target order improves model performance.
Methods work on real-world and gene regulatory network data.
Abstract
We consider the effect of introducing a curriculum of targets when training Boolean models on supervised Multi Label Classification (MLC) problems. In particular, we consider how to order targets in the absence of prior knowledge, and how such a curriculum may be enforced when using meta-heuristics to train discrete non-linear models. We show that hierarchical dependencies between targets can be exploited by enforcing an appropriate curriculum using hierarchical loss functions. On several multi output circuit-inference problems with known target difficulties, Feedforward Boolean Networks (FBNs) trained with such a loss function achieve significantly lower out-of-sample error, up to in some cases. This improvement increases as the loss places more emphasis on target order and is strongly correlated with an easy-to-hard curricula. We also demonstrate the same improvements on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · Machine Learning and Data Classification · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
