Rotation symmetry breaking in La2-xSrxCuO4 revealed by ARPES
E. Razzoli, C. E. Matt, Y. Sassa, M. Mansson, O. Tjernberg, G., Drachuck, M. Monomo, M. Oda, T. Kurosawa, Y. Huang, N. C. Plumb, M. Radovic,, A. Keren, L. Patthey, J. Mesot, and M. Shi

TL;DR
This study uses ARPES to reveal electronic reconstruction and symmetry breaking in La2-xSrxCuO4 near optimal doping, showing a specific wave vector q_a=(pi, 0) causes Fermi surface changes.
Contribution
It uncovers a unique electronic reconstruction associated with a specific wave vector, demonstrating four-fold symmetry breaking in La2-xSrxCuO4.
Findings
Reconstruction linked to wave vector q_a=(pi, 0)
Absence of q_b reconstruction confirms symmetry breaking
Distinct from shadow bands in other cuprates
Abstract
Using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy it is revealed that in the vicinity of optimal doping the electronic structure of La2-xSrxCuO4 cuprate undergoes an electronic reconstruction associated with a wave vector q_a=(pi, 0). The reconstructed Fermi surface and folded band are distinct to the shadow bands observed in BSCCO cuprates and in underdoped La2-xSrxCuO4 with x <= 0.12, which shift the primary band along the zone diagonal direction. Furthermore the folded bands appear only with q_a=(pi, 0) vector, but not with q_b= (0, pi). We demonstrate that the absence of q_b reconstruction is not due to the matrix-element effects in the photoemission process, which indicates the four-fold symmetry is broken in the system.
| ββΒ Β | ||
|---|---|---|
| ββΒ Β 0 | 134 | 1 |
| ββΒ Β 1 | 181 | -2[] |
| ββΒ Β 2 | -23 | -4[] |
| ββΒ Β 3 | 12 | -2[] |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Present address:] Quantum Matter Institute, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1, Canada
Rotation symmetry breaking in La2-xSrxCuO4 revealed by ARPES
E. Razzoli
[
Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
DΓ©partement de Physique and Fribourg Center for Nanomaterials, UniversitΓ© de Fribourg, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
ββ
C. E. Matt
Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
Laboratory for Solid State Physics, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
ββ
Y. Sassa
Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
Laboratory for Solid State Physics, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, S-75121 Uppsala, Sweden
ββ
M. MΓ₯nsson
Laboratory for Quantum Magnetism (LQM),Ecole Polytechnique FΓ©dΓ©rale de Lausanne (EPFL), Station 3, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Laboratory for Neutron Scattering, Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Materials Physics, Electrum 229, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
ββ
O. Tjernberg
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Materials Physics, Electrum 229, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
ββ
G. Drachuck
Physics Department, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
ββ
M. Monomo
Department of Applied Sciences, Muroran Institute of Technology, Muroran 050-8585, Japan
ββ
M. Oda
Department of Physics, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan
ββ
T. Kurosawa
Department of Physics, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan
ββ
Y. Huang
Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
ββ
N. C. Plumb
Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
ββ
M. Radovic
Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
ββ
A. Keren
Physics Department, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
ββ
L. Patthey
Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
ββ
J. Mesot
Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
Laboratory for Solid State Physics, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Institut de la Matiere Complexe, EPF Lausanne, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
ββ
M. Shi
Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
Abstract
Using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy it is revealed that in the vicinity of optimal doping the electronic structure of La2-xSrxCuO4 cuprate undergoes an electronic reconstruction associated with a wave vector . The reconstructed Fermi surface and folded band are distinct to the shadow bands observed in BSCCO cuprates and in underdoped La2-xSrxCuO4 with , which shift the primary band along the zone diagonal direction. Furthermore the folded bands appear only with vector, but not with . We demonstrate that the absence of reconstruction is not due to the matrix-element effects in the photoemission process, which indicates the four-fold symmetry is broken in the system.
pacs:
74.72.Gh, 74.25.Jb, 79.60.-i
I Introduction
Since the discovery of high-temperature cuprate superconductors, the study of various instabilities (e.g. magnetic and charge order) emerging in close proximity to superconductivity has attracted much attention. Significant efforts have been devoted to reveal other instabilities than superconducting one, as a function of doping and temperature, and how they are intertwined with the superconductivity. Recently an incipient incommensurate charge-density-wave (CDW) in underdoped YBa2Cu3O6+y (YBCO) with hole concentrations in the range of 0.09 to 0.13 per planar Cu ion has been reported independently from high-energy X-ray diffraction Chang2012 and resonant soft X-ray scattering Ghiringhelli2012 experiments. Similar charge modulations along the Cu-O bonding directions of underdoped Bi2Sr2-xLaxCuO6+Ξ΄ (Bi2201) and Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+Ξ΄ (Bi2212) have also been observed in scanning-tunneling microscopy and resonant x-ray scattering measurements, with the ordering vector approaching to a commensurate wave vector when the hole doping is increasing Comin2014 ; SilvaNeto2014 . For underdoped La-based β214β family of cuprates (La2-x-y(Sr,Ba)x(Nd,Eu)yCuO4) at a doping level an unidirectional modulated antiferromagnetism Plate2005 combined with a commensurate charge modulation of period 4 lattice constant (stripe order) has long been identified, and at the same doping level the superconducting transition temperature is dramatically reduced Tranquada1995 ; Tranquada1996 . The presence of stripe order in La2-xSrxCuO4 has been debated for long time and only recently scattering measurements have shown evidence for a CDW with a wave vector displaying a doping dependence similar to the one observed in Bi2201 and La2-xBaxCuO4 Croft2014 ; Christensen2014 ; Thampy2014 . However, so far, angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) measurements have not shown any evidence of band folding associated with charge ordering along the Cu-O bond direction in cuprates Kohsaka2008 ; Meng2009 ; Kanigel2006 .
In this letter, applying ARPES to nearly optimally doped LSCO () we show that in the superconducting phase the Fermi surface (FS) is reconstructed along the Cu-O bond direction associated with a wave vector . This wave vector could be related to the second harmonic of an incipient CDW in the region of optimal doping, which is the smooth continuation with doping of the incipient CDW as observed in other cuprates, or could point to a new instability in the system.
II Experimental details
ARPES experiments were carried out at the Surface and Interface Spectroscopy beamline at the Swiss Light Source of Paul Sherrer intitute on single crystals La2-xSrxCuO4 (LSCO). The doping values used for the measurements are and 0.17 with superconducting transition temperature () of 38 K and 35 K, respectively. The crystals were grown in traveling solvent floating zone furnaces. All samples were characterized by x-ray diffraction, and their superconducting transitions were determined by magnetization measurements. Circularly polarized light with eV was used in order to maximize the signal. The spectra were recorded with Scienta R4000 analyzers. The energy and angle resolutions were meV and 0.1 - 0.15β, respectively. The Fermi level was determined by recording photoemission spectra from polycrystalline copper on the sample holder. The samples were cleaved in situ by using a specially designed cleaver Mansson2007 . Low-energy electron diffraction analysis of the cleaved samples shows a clear () pattern with no sign of surface reconstruction [see Fig. 1(a)]. During the measurements, the base pressure always remained less than mbar.
III Experimental results
Figure 1(b) shows the spectral weight mapping in -space at Fermi level (). The superimposed dashed black line is the FS obtained from a tight binding (TB) fit to the extracted from the peak positions of momentum distribution curves (MDC) at and to the MDC peak positions, as a function of binding energy, along the zone diagonal (nodal dispersion). The basis functions and the obtained fitting coefficients with the constraint Pavarini2001 are listed in Table 1. Luttinger sum rule Luttinger1960 gives a hole concentration of , slightly bigger than the nominal doping , in agreement with the observation in early studies Yoshida2006 .
To enhance the weak features, in Fig. 2(a) we display the intensity map at in logarithmic color scale. Besides the primary FS in Map I, in the middle of the intensity plot [see also Fig. 1 (b)], two weak but clearly visible pieces of FS appear on the left and right sides of the primary FS. In Fig. 2(b) we plot the extracted from the peak positions in Map I of MDC at for both the primary FS (red triangles) and the weak pieces of FS (blue circles). It can be seen that the two weak pieces of FS mirror the primary FS about the vertical lines at , which is equivalent to shifting the primary FS by a commensurate wave vector (dashed violet line). The appearance of the weak pieces of FS indicates that a Fermi surface reconstruction related to a wave vector occurs in the system. The reconstructed FS is different to the shadow FS previously observed in LSCO Chang2008 ; Razzoli2010 and in BSCCO cuprates Aebi1994 because in those cases the shadow FS is connected to the primary FS by a wave vector along the zone diagonal, i.e. in the direction. It is important to mention that we have observed a reconstructed FS related to the wave vector , which is nearly parallel to the cut direction, but found no sign for a reconstruction corresponding to wave vector . The lack of the -folded band might be due to two different effects; the folded band is present but not observed due to ARPES selection rules (the so-called βmatrix element effectsβ) Damascelli2003 or the this folded band is not present and the rotational symmetry of the system is broken in favor of symmetry. To confirm that the lack of reconstruction is not due to the matrix element effects in the photoemission process, we rotated the sample about the surface normal (c-axis) by and acquired ARPES data with otherwise unchanged experimental conditions. In case of a matrix element effects we would expect to see the band folded again in direction parallel to the (new) cut direction, i.e. along the . As shown in Map II of Fig. 2(a) and in the corresponding in Fig. 2(b) (light-blue pentagons and green rhombus), the reconstructed FS is not displaced along but still follow the original folding direction . This observation demonstrates that the reconstruction of FS is not due to matrix elements effects and it ascertains that the four-fold symmetry is broken in the system. The reconstruction is further illustrated in Fig. 3 which shows the band dispersions along cut 1-4 as indicated in Fig. 2(b). All the folded-bands associated with the reconstruction can be reproduced after shifting the primary band by wave vector . On the other hand, no folded-band related to reconstruction was observed.
We have investigated the folded bands in LSCO in a wide doping range. For a folded band related to a shifting of the primary band by was observed Razzoli2010 . For , except the primary FS and band, there is no indication for any observable reconstructed FS and folded band in our ARPES data acquired in the same experimental conditions. The FS reconstruction and the associated band folding appear only in the vicinity of optimally doped samples (). Figure 4 shows the ARPES spectra taken from a slightly underdoped LSCO sample with . Although the intensity is weaker than the case for , the folded bands are still clearly visible, as indicated by the arrows in Figs. 4(a)-(e). The extracted from the peak positions of MDC at show that the folded bands and their FS result from a reconstruction [Fig. 4(f)].
IV Discussion
The electronic reconstruction in the vicinity of optimal doping of LSCO () is different to the previously observed shadow bands and FS duplication along the zone diagonal in cuprates Chang2008 ; Razzoli2010 ; Aebi1994 . This rules out the possibility that the reconstruction is due to structurally orthorhombic distortions (LTO) of the crystal structure from tetragonality, because in that case one would expect that a copy of the primary FS is shifted along the direction Mans2006 . A low temperature tetragonal reconstruction (LTT), as the one observed in La2-xBaxCuO4 Axe1989 , localized at the surface of LSCO could explain the reconstruction. Indeed LSCO has been reported to be on the verge of a LTO to LTT transition at low temperature Thurston1989 , which could get stabilized at the surface during the cleaving procedure. However while our measurements report that the reconstruction is stabilized only in a narrow range of optimal dopings (), inelastic neutron-scattering measurements show that at the LTO-LTT structure instability is stronger at low dopings ()Kimura2000 . The opposite dependence of the LTO-LTT instability and of the reported folding suggests that two effect may not be related. The absence in the LEED patterns [see e.g. Fig. 1(a)] of any signature of or surface reconstruction indicates that the folding could result from a dynamic charge modulation or from a nontrivial structural distortion, similar but different to the case of Bi2212 shadows bands Mans2006 , where a orthorombic distortion was observed in LEED only at very low energies (below 20 eV) Strocov2003 .
The strong doping dependence of the folded bands suggests that the folding, independently from its origin, is somehow tied to the electronic properties of the sample. The folded bands were observed at K which is well below the superconducting temperature 38 K and 35 K for LSCO with and , respectively. This suggests that if the electronic reconstruction is associated with an instability in the system such as a density wave, the ordering coexists with superconducting instability. We note that the wave vector associated with the electronic reconstruction is unexpected from the smooth continuation of the incipient incommensurate charge-density-wave along the Cu-O bonding direction, observed in LSCO Croft2014 ; Christensen2014 ; Thampy2014 and other underdoped cuprates Chang2012 ; Ghiringhelli2012 ; Comin2014 ; SilvaNeto2014 . There, with increasing doping, the incipient incommensurate wave vector is approaching a commensurate one , instead of . However, one possibility could be that the observed corresponds to band-folding associated with two times of , and the electronic states related to the reconstruction is too weak to be observed due to the matrix element effects in the photoemission process. Another possibility is that the reconstructed FS is related the change of FS topology near Razzoli2010 . In LSCO, at the doping level slightly above , the primary FS changes from a hole-like pocket centered at the point to an electron-like pocket centered at the point, the center of the BZ. Accompanying with the topological change of the FS a Van Hove singularity at saddle-point approaches the Fermi level. The large and discontinuous density of states near could result in a dynamic charge modulation which leads to a spontaneous breakdown of the point group symmetry Halboth2000 ; Gonzalez2001 . The charge modulations could involve the whole crystal or the bulk system could be on the verge of a electronic reconstruction which get stabilized only at the surface by the disorder and/or the breaking of translational symmetry, similarly to what was shown for the stripe order in LSCO with Wu2012 .
Regardless of the exact origin, our observation indicates that at low temperatures an instability associated with the breaking of symmetry coexists with superconductivity near the optimal doping of LSCO. However, it is unclear whether the observed electronic reconstruction is general for hole-doped superconducting cuprates, or is particularly related to LSCO.
V Conclusions
In summary, using ARPES we revealed the presence of a weaker folded band which resembles the primary band shifted by in the superconducting state of nearly optimally doped LSCO (). We show that the absence of a folded band is intrinsic but not due to the matrix element effects of the photoemission process, which indicates that the symmetry is broken in the system. The unusual doping dependence of such folded band deserves further study to identify its origin.
Acknowledgements.
We are grateful to J. Chang for useful discussions. This work was performed at SLS of the Paul Scherrer Insitut, Villigen PSI, Switzerland and it was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation through NCCR MaNEP and the Grant No. 200021-137783. E.R. acknowledges support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) grant no. P300P2164649. M.M. and Y.S. acknowledge project funding from the Swedish Research Council (Dnr. 2016-06955). We thank the beam line staff of SIS for their excellent support.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1(1) J. Chang, E. Blackburn, A. T. Holmes, N. B. Christensen, J. Larsen, J. Mesot, Ruixing Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, A. Watenphul, M. v. Zimmermann, E. M. Forgan, and S. M. Hayden Nature Physics 8, 871-876 (2012).
- 2(2) G. Ghiringhelli, M. Le Tacon, M. Minola, S. Blanco-Canosa, C. Mazzoli, N. B. Brookes, G. M. De Luca, A. Frano 2, D. G. Hawthorn, F. He, T. Loew, M. Moretti Sala, D. C. Peets, M. Salluzzo, E. Schierle, R. Sutarto, G. A. Sawatzky, E. Weschke, B. Keimer, and L. Braicovich Science 337, 821-825 (2012).
- 3(3) R. Comin, A. Frano, M. M. Yee, Y. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, E. Schierle, E. Weschke, R. Sutarto, F. He, A. Soumyanarayanan, Yang He, M. Le Tacon, I. S. Elfimov, Jennifer E. Hoffman, G. A. Sawatzky, B. Keimer, A. Damascelli Science 343, 390-392 (2014).
- 4(4) E. H. da Silva Neto, P. Aynajian, A. Frano, R. Comin, E. Schierle, Eugen Weschke, A. Gyenis, J. Wen, J. Schneeloch, Z. Xu, S. Ono, G. Gu, M. Le Tacon, and A. Yazdani Science 343, 393-396 (2014).
- 5(5) M. PlatΓ©, J. D. F. Mottershead, I. S. Elfimov, D. C. Peets, Ruixing Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, S. Chiuzbaian, M. Falub, M. Shi, L. Patthey, and A. Damascelli Phys. Rev. Lett 95, 077001 (2005).
- 6(6) J. M. Tranquada, B. J. Sternlieb, J. D. Axe, Y. Nakamura and S. Uchida, Nature 375, 561 - 563 (1995).
- 7(7) J. M. Tranquada, J. D. Axe, N. Ichikawa, Y. Nakamura, S. Uchida, and B. Nachumi Phys. Rev. B 54, 7489 (1996).
- 8(8) T. P. Croft , C. Lester, M. S. Senn, A. Bombardi, and S. M. Hayden, Phys. Rev. B 89, 224513 (2014).
