On Closed Mappings of Sigma-Compact Spaces and Dimension
El\.zbieta Pol, Roman Pol

TL;DR
This paper investigates the properties of closed images of certain sigma-compact spaces, showing they either contain sets with no transfinite dimension or arbitrarily high dimension, and constructs examples with dimension-preserving maps.
Contribution
It provides new results on the dimension behavior of closed images of sigma-compact spaces, including specific constructions for dimension-preserving mappings.
Findings
Non-one-point closed images of certain spaces contain sets with no transfinite dimension.
Constructed sigma-compact spaces with images maintaining or exceeding original dimension.
Examples for both finite and transfinite dimensions demonstrating dimension preservation.
Abstract
We prove that if K is a remainder of the Hilbert space (i.e., K is the complement of the Hilbert space in its metrizable compactification) then every non-one-point closed image of K either contains a compact set with no transfinite dimension or contains compact sets of arbitrarily high inductive transfinite dimension ind. We construct also for each natural n a sigma-compact metrizable n-dimensional space whose image under any non-constant closed map has dimension at least n, and analogous examples for the transfinite dimension ind.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Advanced Banach Space Theory · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
On closed mappings of -compact spaces and dimension
Elżbieta Pol and Roman Pol
University of Warsaw and University of Warsaw
[email protected] and [email protected]
Abstract.
A remainder of the Hilbert space is a space homeomorphic to , where is a metrizable compact extension of , with dense in . We prove that for any remainder of , every non-one-point closed image of either contains a compact set with no transfinite dimension or contains compact sets of arbitrarily high inductive transfinite dimension ind. We shall also construct for each natural a -compact metrizable -dimensional space whose image under any non-constant closed map has dimension at least , and analogous examples for the transfinite inductive dimension ind (this provides a rather strong negative solution of a problem in [EnP]).
Key words and phrases:
Hilbert space, remainder, closed mapping, transfinite small inductive dimension, Effros Borel space,
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary: 57N20, 54E40, 54F45; Secondary 54D40, 54H05
1. Introduction
We shall consider only metrizable separable spaces. A remainder of a space is a space homeomorphic to , where is a compact extension of with dense in , cf. [AN], [E1]. Notice that if is topologically complete, its remainders are countable unions of compact sets.
A standard remainder of the Hilbert space is the subspace of the Hilbert cube consisting of points with all but finitely many coordinates zero, cf. [BP]. However, remainders of form a much wider class, cf. [B], [C], [HeW], [vM1], including spaces which are countable unions of finite-dimensional compacta containing no arcs, cf. [vM1].
Let us recall that the transfinite dimension ind is the extension of the Menger-Urysohn dimension by transfinite induction, cf. [HuW] (some additional information is in section 2).
The space has no transfinite dimension and in fact, by [EP], no image of under a closed map has transfinite dimension, unless it reduces to a singleton.
We shall strengthen this result to the following effect.
Theorem 1.1**.**
Let be a remainder of the Hilbert space . Then every non-one-point image of under a closed map either contains a compact set with no transfinite dimension or contains compact sets of arbitrarily high transfinite dimension.
The proof is based on [EP] and our recent paper [PP1] which appeals to the classical theorem of Hurewicz on non-analyticity of the collection of compact sets of the rationals.
Similar reasonings, although in a different setting, yield the following result, which provides a solution (in a rather strong form) to Problem 7.19 in [EnP].
Theorem 1.2**.**
For each countable ordinal , there exists a -compact space which has the transfinite dimension ind (if is finite, so is ind), such that every image of under a non-constant closed mapping contains a compact set whose transfinite dimension ind is either or is not defined.
The -compact spaces in Theorem 1.2 can not be completely metrizable. Indeed, if a non-one-point space contains a compact set with nonempty interior, then it admits a non-constant closed map into the real line.
However, if we restrict the class of mappings to perfect maps, the situation is not clear. We address this briefly in Comments 5.4 and 5.4.
2. Some background
2.1. The transfinite dimension ind and countable-dimensional spaces.
The transfinite dimension ind is the extension by transfinite induction of the Menger-Urysohn small inductive dimension, see [HuW], [Na], [E2]. All spaces for which the transfinite inductive dimension ind is defined are countable-dimensional, i.e., they are countable unions of zero-dimensional sets. However, the space is countable-dimensional, but has no transfinite dimension ( contains topologically all Smirnov’s spaces , , and the set is unbounded in , cf. [E2], 5.3.11, 7.1.33 and 7.2.12).
Let us notice also that a space has the transfinite dimension ind if and only if has a countable-dimensional topologically complete (equivalently - compact) extension, cf. [E2], 7.2.19 and 7.2.21.
We shall need an observation (easily checked by induction), that if is a closed nonempty subspace of a space and ind then ind.
We shall also use the fact that perfect mappings with zero-dimensional fibers do not lower the transfinite dimension ind.
2.2. The Effros Borel spaces.
Given a space , we denote by the space of closed subsets of and the Effros Borel structure in is the -algebra in generated by the sets , where is open in . The Effros Borel space is the space equipped with the Effros Borel structure and if is either -compact or completely metrizable the Effros Borel space is standard, cf. [K], 12.C. If is compact the Effros Borel structure coincides with the -algebra of Borel sets with respect to the Vietoris topology in the hyperspace , cf. [K], 12.7.
2.3. Non-trivial closed maps of remainders of are perfect.
It was noticed in [EP], Lemma 3, that if is a closed map onto a non-one-point space, then all fibers of are compact, i.e., is perfect. The same is true for any closed map on a remainder of , cf. [Mi].
Let us outline a justification of this fact (being a minor modification of a reasoning from [EP]).
Let be a compactum containing , where is a dense subspace of homeomorphic to . By Vaǐnšteǐn’s Lemma (cf. [E1], 4.4.16), for each the set is compact. To prove that is perfect it suffices to show that for every . Suppose that Int for some , and let . Since , is a partition in between and some other point in . This is, however, impossible, since no compact subset of separates . To see this, suppose that is a compact partition in between points and . Then there exists a partition in between and such that (cf. [E2], Lemma 1.2.9). Since is dense in , is a -compact partition in between some two points, which contradicts the fact that no -compact subset of separates (cf. [BP], Ch.V, Corollary 6.2 and Theorem 6.3).
2.4. Hereditarily disconnected -sets in compacta.
Let be a compact space with ind, . Then there exists a hereditarily disconnected -set in with ind.
For finite , this can be derived from Theorems 3.9.3 and 3.11.8 in [vM2].
For arbitrary countable ordinal , one can use the following reasoning from [RP2]. Let be a metric on . There is a point in and such that for each , the sphere has dimension ind.
Let be embedded in the Hilbert cube , . Then the graph is a topological copy of and each section is a copy of . The reasoning in section 6.2 of [RP2] provides a -set in which projects onto the second coordinate onto the irrationals in in a one-to-one way, and ind.
In particular, using Smirnov’s compact spaces (cf. [E2]), one can define completely metrizable spaces with ind containing no non-trivial continuum (cf. [RP2], 6.2).
2.5. An application of Hurewicz’s theorem.
We shall use the following result from [PP1], based on a classical theorem of Hurewicz, cf. [K], Exercises 27.8, 27.9.
Proposition 2.1**.**
Let be a continuous map of a complete space onto a non--compact space . Then there is a collection of closed relatively discrete sets in such that for any analytic collection in the Effros Borel space containing , there are and with .
3. Proof of Theorem 1.1
The Hilbert space is homeomorphic to the countable product of the real line , cf. [BP]. Let , where is a compact extension of . By 2.3 it is enough to assume that
- (1)
is a perfect surjection.
We shall also assume that and using a theorem of Vaǐnšteǐn [E1], Problem 4.5.13(d), one can find a -set in containing and an extension of over with values in such that
- (2)
is perfect.
Let , where are compact. The projection of onto the coordinate is contained in an interval and let . Then, cf. [BP], Ch.VI, Example 8.1,
- (3)
is homeomorphic to ,
and
- (4)
,
the closure being considered in .
Let, cf. (4),
- (5)
.
Since is compact and no compact subset of has nonempty interior in , cf. (3), is dense in . Since is perfect (see (1) and (5)) and is an extension of , we infer that (cf. [E1], Lemma 3.7.4)
- (6)
.
Since is homeomorphic to its square, applying Proposition 2.1 to the projection , we get, by (3), a collection of closed relatively discrete sets in such that for any analytic collection in the Effros Borel space containing , there is an element of containing a closed copy of .
Let, cf. (3) and (4),
- (7)
.
Then, cf. (1), (2), (5), (6),
- (8)
.
Aiming at a contradiction, assume that all compact subsets of have transfinite dimension and there exists which bounds the transfinite dimension ind of all compact sets in .
Since the restriction of to is a closed map onto , cf. (6), (7), the collection
- (9)
consists of closed, topologically discrete subspaces of . Therefore, for any , the closure of in intersects in a compact set, and in effect
- (10)
for any .
The set of compacta in S with transfinite dimension ind not greater than is analytic in the hyperspace , cf. [RP1], and the map from the Effros Borel space to being Borel, we conclude that
- (11)
is analytic in .
By (9), and, since the map from to is Borel, the set
- (12)
is analytic in ,
and
- (13)
.
By the choice of , there is containing a closed copy of . In effect, we get a perfect map of a copy of onto a space with transfinite dimension ind , which contradicts [EP], Remark 2.
This completes the proof of Theorem 1.1.
4. Proof of Theorem 1.2
We shall first describe a completely metrizable space with ind, which contains no non-trivial continuum, can not be separated by any closed -compact set and contains a closed set admitting a continuous map onto the irrationals such that
- (1)
ind for all .
We begin with a 1-dimensional completely metrizable, connected space containing no non-trivial continuum [KS].
In particular, compact sets in are boundary, and we can find a discrete collection of closed copies of the irrationals in .
Let be the set of irrationals in , and .
One easily checks that is 1-dimensional, completely metrizable and contains no non-trivial continuum. What we gain by passing from to is that no closed -compact set separates .
Indeed, aiming at a contradiction, assume that is -compact and , where are nonempty open sets and .
Let be the projection. The sets , , and are -sets in and hence are -compact boundary sets in , for Therefore, is dense in and . The sets , , cover , being connected, hence and we can pick . Since is not -compact, there is . But then and , which is impossible.
To get the space , we take a completely metrizable space with ind, containing no non-trivial continuum, cf. 2.4, and we replace by a closed copy of the product . More precisely, we fix a perfect surjection and we let be the result of attaching to through the map .
Then ind ind, and since maps perfectly onto , no closed -compact set separates . Also, embeds in as a closed subspace . Let be the projection.
Having defined and , let us consider a countable-dimensional compact extension of such that is dense in (if , we can have ind ind), and let
- (2)
, and ,
where the closure is taken in .
Then the arguments from 2.3 show that all closed non-constant maps on are in fact perfect.
We shall check that the space has the required properties. It is enough to show that if
- (3)
is a perfect surjection,
then for some compact set in , either has no transfinite dimension ind or else ind.
Aiming at a contradiction, assume that
- (4)
ind for any compact set .
As in section 3, we consider , , and we use Vaǐnšteǐn’s theorem to get a -set in containing and an extension of with values in such that
- (5)
is perfect.
The set is -compact and . Therefore, there exists a closed in copy of the irrationals, disjoint from the -compact set . Then is closed in and hence its closure in is contained in . Let
- (6)
, .
Since is a -compact subset of a hereditarily disconnected set , it is zero-dimensional. Applying to the fibers an observation from 2.1, and using (1), we infer that, cf. (6),
- (7)
ind for .
Since the restriction is perfect, and is dense in , we have also
- (8)
.
We shall apply Proposition 2.1 to the map and let be a collection of closed, relatively discrete sets in , provided by this proposition.
We can now repeat reasonings from section 3, involving collections and in the Effros Borel space almost verbatim, changing in formulas (10), (11) and (12) in section 3 the inequality to the strict inequality , up to the point, where one considers an element such that for some , . Now, restricted to is perfect, cf. (8), and since is hereditarily disconnected, the fibers of are zero-dimensional. As we noted in sec. 2.1, this implies that ind ind ind, cf. (7), providing a contradiction with (4), which completes the proof.
5. Comments
5.1. Completions of perfect images of remainders of .
Let be a remainder of and let be a perfect surjection. Then every completion of contains a strongly infinite-dimensional compactum (cf. [E1], Ch.6).
Indeed, the reasoning in section 3 yields a closed copy of and a perfect map ( is the closure of in a compactification with the remainder ) such that . Then is a perfect map and [EP], Remark 2, provides a strongly infinite dimensional compactum in .
5.2. The transfinite dimension dim.
Using similar reasonings as in Section 3 one can show that for any perfect image of a remainder of , either contains a strongly infinite-dimensional compactum or the transfinite dimension dim (cf. [E2], 7.3.19) of compacta in is unbounded.
5.3. A question.
There is a countable-dimensional space which is an absolute -set, all compact subsets of are at most zero-dimensional and has no transfinite dimension ind.
Indeed, there exists a -set in such that neither nor contain a non-trivial continuum, cf. [PP2], Remark 4.2. Then, for any -set in containing , is zero-dimensional, and since has no transfinite dimension, this is also true for . This shows that has no transfinite dimension, cf. 2.1.
However, we do not know if there exist countable-dimensional -compact sets such that has no transfinite dimension ind but the transfinite dimensions of all compact sets in are bounded.
5.4. Perfect maps.
A part of the reasoning in section 4 can be used also to the following effect (let us recall that a set is punctiform if it contains no non-trivial continuum, cf. [E2]).
Proposition 5.4.1. Let be a countable ordinal and let be a compact space with ind. Then there exists a punctiform -set in such that each perfect image of its complement contains a compact set whose transfinite dimension ind is either or is not defined.
In particular, for each natural there is a finite-dimensional -compact space whose all perfect images are at least -dimensional. In fact, the case of natural can be treated separately, without appealing to the Hurewicz theorem, leading to a conclusion that each -dimensional compact space contains an -dimensional -compact space, all whose perfect images are at least -dimensional.
Let us sketch this reasoning.
Let be an dimensional compact space, being a natural number. Let , , , be an essential family of pairs of disjoint closed sets in , cf. [vM2], sec. 3.1, and let , be disjoint closed sets in containing in its interiors and , respectively.
Using a theorem of Hurewicz, [Ku], §45, IX, one can find continuous maps such that , and for some Cantor sets , the fibers with are at most -dimensional, .
One can pick -sets such that hits every continuum joining and and is injective on , cf. [vM2], proofs of 3.9.3 and 3.11.8. Then, cf. [PP2], Lemma 5.1, contains no non-trivial continuum.
The closed set contains and is at most -dimensional. Let be a zero-dimensional -set such that is at most -dimensional, and let .
Then contains no non-trivial continuum and hits every continuum joining some pair , , for .
We claim that the -dimensional -compact set has required properties.
Indeed, let be a perfect surjection, and let , be the monotone-light decomposition of , i.e., , the fibers of are connected, the fibers of are zero-dimensional, and both are perfect, cf. [E1], 6.2.22. Then , for . Let be a partition in between and and let . Since is a partition in between and and and are in the interior of and , respectively, there exists a partition in between and such that , cf. [E2], Lemma 1.2.9. The intersection contains a continuum joining and , and since contains no non-trivial continuum, , hence . It follows that and this shows that is at least -dimensional. Since light perfect mappings do not lower the dimension, also is at least -dimensional.
5.5. Perfect maps on certain sums of subspaces.
Let be an open set in a space such that is locally compact. If has a perfect map onto a space with ind equal to , then has a perfect map onto a space with ind .
To see this, let us consider a compact extension of and let be a metric on bounded by 1. Let be the closure of in and (notice that is compact, being locally compact).
Let be a perfect map onto a space with ind. Let be the metric cone over , i.e., , where basic neighbourhoods of the vertex are the sets and let . We have ind, cf. [E2], 7.2.F.
The function defined by if and if is a perfect map (following [E1], [E2] we assume that the image of a perfect map is closed in its range).
To check that is perfect, let us consider , . If , for some and almost all , and therefore for almost all , and converges to the first coordinate of , belonging to . By perfectness of , the sequence has a subsequence convergent in , hence in . If , , let us pick a subsequence of converging to a point in . Since , and since , . In effect, , i.e. the sequence is convergent in .
Let us notice the following consequence of this approach.
Let be the class of spaces which can be exhausted in steps by a subsequent removing of maximal relatively open locally compact sets. Then each element of has a perfect map onto at most -dimensional space. Let be the minimal number with this property. We do not know if the numbers , , are bounded.
To conclude, it seems that the remark of Isbell [Is], page 119, that the relations between perfect mappings and dimensional properties call for more studies is still valid.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[AN] J.M. Aarts, T. Nishiura, Dimension and Extensions , North Holland, 1993.
- 2[B] P. Bowers, Fake boundary sets in the Hilbert cube , Proc.A.M.S. 93 (1985), 121-127.
- 3[BP] C. Bessaga, A. Pełczyński, Selected Topics in Infinite-Dimensional Topology , PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw, 1975, Monografie Matematyczne, tom 58.
- 4[C] D.W. Curtis, Boundary sets in the Hilbert cube , Topology Appl. 20 (1985), 201-221.
- 5[E 1] R. Engelking, General Topology , Heldermann Verlag, Berlin, 1989.
- 6[E 2] R. Engelking, Theory of Dimensions, Finite and Infinite , Sigma Series in Pure Mathematics, vol. 10, Heldermann Verlag, Lemgo, 1995.
- 7[En P] R. Engelking, E.Pol, Countable-dimensional spaces: a survey , Diss. Math. 216 (1983),1-41.
- 8[He W] J.P. Henderson, J.J. Walsh, Examples of cell-like decompositions of the infinite-dimensional manifolds σ 𝜎 \sigma and Σ Σ \Sigma , Topology Appl. 16 (1983), 143-154.
