On Gallai's and Haj\'os' Conjectures for graphs with treewidth at most 3
F\'abio Botler, Maycon Sambinelli, Rafael S. Coelho, Orlando Lee

TL;DR
This paper proves Gallai's and Hajós' conjectures for graphs with treewidth at most 3, extending their validity to a broader class of graphs and providing new proofs for specific subclasses.
Contribution
It verifies Gallai's and Hajós' conjectures for graphs with treewidth at most 3 and identifies the exceptional graphs that do not admit certain path decompositions.
Findings
Gallai's and Hajós' conjectures hold for graphs with treewidth ≤ 3.
Only K_3 and K_5-e are exceptions among these graphs.
New proofs are provided for graphs with maximum degree ≤ 4 and planar graphs with girth ≥ 6.
Abstract
A path (resp. cycle) decomposition of a graph is a set of edge-disjoint paths (resp. cycles) of that covers the edge set of . Gallai (1966) conjectured that every graph on vertices admits a path decomposition of size at most , and Haj\'os (1968) conjectured that every Eulerian graph on vertices admits a cycle decomposition of size at most . Gallai's Conjecture was verified for many classes of graphs. In particular, Lov\'asz (1968) verified this conjecture for graphs with at most one vertex of even degree, and Pyber (1996) verified it for graphs in which every cycle contains a vertex of odd degree. Haj\'os' Conjecture, on the other hand, was verified only for graphs with maximum degree and for planar graphs. In this paper, we verify Gallai's and Haj\'os' Conjectures for graphs with treewidth at most . Moreover, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory · Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems
