
TL;DR
This paper characterizes algebraic points of degree 4 on the Fermat quintic curve, providing a detailed algebraic description and identifying the unique Galois extension associated with such points.
Contribution
It offers a new algebraic description of degree 4 points on the Fermat quintic and establishes the uniqueness of the Galois extension involved.
Findings
Only one Galois extension of degree 4 arises from these points.
Provides a complete algebraic description of degree 4 points.
Builds on previous geometric and diophantine work to classify points.
Abstract
In this paper, we study the algebraic points of degree over on the Fermat curve of equation . A geometrical description of these points has been given in 1997 by Klassen and Tzermias. Using their result, as well as Bruin's work about diophantine equations of signature , we give here an algebraic description of these points. In particular, we prove there is only one Galois extension of of degree that arises as the field of definition of a non-trivial point of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · Commutative Algebra and Its Applications
Quartic points on the Fermat quintic
Alain Kraus
Abstract.
In this paper, we study the algebraic points of degree over on the Fermat curve of equation . A geometrical description of these points has been given in 1997 by Klassen and Tzermias. Using their result, as well as Bruin’s work about diophantine equations of signature , we give here an algebraic description of these points. In particular, we prove there is only one Galois extension of of degree that arises as the field of definition of a non-trivial point of .
Key words and phrases:
Fermat quintic, number fields, rational points.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 11D41; Secondary 11G30
1. Introduction
Let us denote by the quintic Fermat curve over given by the equation
[TABLE]
Let be a point in . The degree of is the degree of its field of definition over . Write for the projective coordinates of . It is said to be non-trivial if . Let be a primitive cubic root of unity and
[TABLE]
It is well known that . In 1978, Gross and Rohrlich have proved that the only quadratic points of are and [2, th. 5.1]. In 1997, by proving that the group of -rational points of the Jacobian of is isomorphic to , and by expliciting generators, Klassen and Tzermias have described geometrically all the points of whose degrees are less than [4, th. 1]. I mention that Top and Sall have pushed further this description for points of of degrees less than [5]. In particular, Klassen and Tzermias have established the following statement :
Theorem 1**.**
The points of degree of arise as the intersection of with a rational line passing through or .
Using this result, and Bruin’s work about the diophantine equations and [1, 3], we propose in this paper to give an algebraic description of the non-trivial quartic points of .
2. Statement of the results
Let be a number field of degree over .
Theorem 2**.**
Suppose that has a non-trivial point of degree . One of the following conditions is satisfied :
1) the Galois closure of is a dihedral extension of of degree .
2) One has
[TABLE]
The extension is cyclic. Up to Galois conjugation and permutation, is the only non-trivial point in .
As a direct consequence of [2, th. 5.1] and the previous theorem, we obtain :
Corollary 1**.**
Suppose that does not satisfy one of the two conditions above. The set of non-trivial points of is contained in .
All that follows is devoted to the proof of theorem 2.
3. Preliminary results
Let be a non-trivial point of degree . By permuting if necessary, we can suppose that belongs to a -rational line passing through (th. 1). Moreover, being non-trivial we shall assume
[TABLE]
Lemma 1**.**
One has . There exists , , such that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Proof.
The equation of the tangent line to at the point is . Since , it is distinct from . According to (3.1), it follows there exists such that
[TABLE]
In particular, one has . Furthermore, one has
[TABLE]
Indeed, if , the equalities and imply
[TABLE]
Since is non-trivial, one has , so . This leads to or , which contradicts the fact that is not a quadratic point, and proves (3.4).
From the equalities (3.3) and , as well as the condition , we then deduce the lemma. ∎
Let be the Galois group of the Galois closure of over . Let us denote by the order of .
Lemma 2**.**
1) One has .
2) Suppose that . One of the two following conditions is satisfied :
- (1)
* is a square in .*
- (2)
* is a square in .*
Proof.
Let us denote in
[TABLE]
One has (lemma 1). Let such that
[TABLE]
The element is a root of the polynomial . So we have the inclusion
[TABLE]
Moreover, we have the equality
[TABLE]
Since and , we have
[TABLE]
From (3.6), we deduce that the roots of belong to at most two quadratic extensions of . The equality (3.7) then implies . Since divides , this proves the first assertion.
Henceforth let us suppose i.e. the extension is Galois. Let be the discriminant of . One has the equalities
[TABLE]
Let us prove that
[TABLE]
From (3.6) and our assumption, the roots of the polynomials
[TABLE]
belong to , which is a quadratic extension of ((3.5) and (3.7)). Therefore, the product of their discriminants
[TABLE]
must be a square in . The first equality of (3.8) then implies (3.9).
Suppose that the condition (1) is not satisfied. From second equality of (3.8), we deduce that in not a square in . It follows from (3.9) that we have
[TABLE]
Therefore, is a square in , in other words, such is the case for . One has the equality
[TABLE]
This implies the condition (2) and proves the lemma. ∎
4. The curve
Let us denote by the curve, of genus , given by the equation
[TABLE]
Proposition 1**.**
The set is empty.
Proof.
Suppose there exists a point . Let . We obtain
[TABLE]
Let and be coprime integers, with , such that
[TABLE]
Let us prove there exists such that
[TABLE]
For every prime number , let be the -adic valuation over .
If is a prime number dividing , distinct from , one has , consequently
[TABLE]
Moreover, one has ( is not a square modulo ), so . In particular, one has
[TABLE]
Let us verify the congruence
[TABLE]
One has . Suppose . In this case, one has . The equality (4.1) implies and , which leads to a contradiction. Therefore, we have , which proves (4.5).
The conditions (4.3), (4.4) and (4.5) then imply (4.2).
We deduce from (4.1) and (4.2) the equality
[TABLE]
One has . From the informations given in the Appendix of [3], this implies
[TABLE]
We obtain , which is not the abscissa of a point of , hence the result. ∎
5. The curve
Let us denote by the curve, of genus , given by the equation
[TABLE]
Proposition 2**.**
One has
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let be a point of . Let and be coprime integers such that
[TABLE]
We obtain the equality
[TABLE]
Therefore, is the square of an integer. Moreover, and are coprime apart from and . So, changing by if necessary, there exists such that
[TABLE]
Suppose In this case, must be even, therefore , which is not.
Suppose . One has . It then comes from [3] that
[TABLE]
We obtain or , which leads to the announced points in the statement.
Suppose . It follows from (5.1) that there exists such that . Since and are coprime, does not divide . We then directly verify that the two equalities and do not have simultaneously any solutions modulo , hence the result. ∎
6. End of the proof of Theorem 2
The group is isomorphic to a subgroup of the symmetric group and one has or (lemma 2). In case , is isomorphic to a -Sylow subgroup of , that is dihedral.
Suppose and let us prove the assertion 2 of the theorem.
First, we directly verify that the extension defined by the condition (2.1) is cyclic of degree , and that the point belongs to .
Conversely, from the proposition 1, the condition (1) of the lemma 2 is not satisfied. The condition (2) and the proposition 2 imply that or . The case is excluded because is non-trivial. With the condition (3.2), we obtain
[TABLE]
Thus, necessarily is a root of the polynomial , in other words is a conjugate over of . The equality (3.3),
[TABLE]
then implies the result.
Acknowledgments. I thank D. Bernardi for his remarks during the writing of this paper.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] N. Bruin Chabauty methods and covering techniques applied to generalised Fermat equations , PHD Leiden University, Niederland (1999).
- 2[2] B. H. Gross and D. E. Rohrlich, Some results on the Mordell-Weil group of the Jacobian of the Fermat curve , Invent. Math. 44 (1978), 201-224.
- 3[3] W. Ivorra, Sur les équations x p + 2 β y p = z 2 superscript 𝑥 𝑝 superscript 2 𝛽 superscript 𝑦 𝑝 superscript 𝑧 2 x^{p}+2^{\beta}y^{p}=z^{2} et x p + 2 β y p = 2 z 2 superscript 𝑥 𝑝 superscript 2 𝛽 superscript 𝑦 𝑝 2 superscript 𝑧 2 x^{p}+2^{\beta}y^{p}=2z^{2} , Acta Arith. 108 (2003), 327-338.
- 4[4] M. Klassen and P. Tzermias, Algebraic points of low degree on the Fermat quintic , Acta Arith. 82 (1997), 393-401.
- 5[5] T. Top and O. Sall, Points algébriques de degrés au plus 12 12 12 sur la quintique de Fermat , Acta Arith. 169 (2015), 385-395.
