Menon-type identities concerning Dirichlet characters
L\'aszl\'o T\'oth

TL;DR
This paper generalizes Menon's identity for Dirichlet characters by considering even functions modulo n, providing new formulas and an alternative proof approach, and explores related Ramanujan sum identities.
Contribution
It extends Menon's identity to even functions modulo n and offers a new proof method, also deriving related formulas involving Ramanujan sums.
Findings
Generalized Menon-type identities for even functions mod n
Derived new formulas involving Ramanujan sums
Provided an alternative proof approach for the identities
Abstract
Let be a Dirichlet character (mod ) with conductor . In a quite recent paper Zhao and Cao deduced the identity , which reduces to Menon's identity if is the principal character (mod ). We generalize the above identity by considering even functions (mod ), and offer an alternative approach to proof. We also obtain certain related formulas concerning Ramanujan sums.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnalytic Number Theory Research · Advanced Mathematical Identities · Graph theory and applications
Menon-type identities concerning Dirichlet characters
László Tóth
Department of Mathematics, University of Pécs
Ifjúság útja 6, 7624 Pécs, Hungary
E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract
Let be a Dirichlet character (mod ) with conductor . In a quite recent paper Zhao and Cao deduced the identity , which reduces to Menon’s identity if is the principal character (mod ). We generalize the above identity by considering even functions (mod ), and offer an alternative approach to proof. We also obtain certain related formulas concerning Ramanujan sums.
Int. J. Number Theory 14, No. 4 (2018), 1047-1054
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 11A07, 11A25
Key Words and Phrases: Menon’s identity, Dirichlet character, primitive character, arithmetic function, even function (mod ), Euler’s totient function, Ramanujan sum, congruence
1 Introduction
In a quite recent paper Zhao and Cao [13] derived the following identity. Let be a Dirichlet character (mod ) with conductor (). Then
[TABLE]
where stands for the greatest common divisor of and , is Euler’s totient function and is the divisor function. If is the principal character (mod ), that is , then (1.1) reduces to Menon’s identity
[TABLE]
On the other hand, if is a primitive Dirichlet character (mod ), then (1.1) gives (the case )
[TABLE]
In fact, Zhao and Cao [13] first proved formula (1.3) and then deduced identity (1.1) by using the fact that every Dirichlet character is induced by a primitive character (Lemma 3.1). They showed that the left hand sides of (1.1) and (1.3) are multiplicative in and computed their values for prime powers.
It is the goal of the present paper to generalize these identities by considering even functions (mod ), and to offer an alternative approach to proof, based on direct manipulations of the corresponding sums, valid for any integer .
A function is called an even function (mod ) if holds for any , where is fixed. The term -even function is also used in the literature. Examples of even functions (mod ) are , more generally , where is an arbitrary arithmetic function; , representing the Ramanujan sum; the function , counting the solutions of the congruence (mod ) such that , with fixed. General accounts of even functions (mod ) can be found, e.g., in the books by McCarthy [4], Schwarz and Spilker [7], and the paper by the author and Haukkanen [12].
Different Menon-type identities were established by several authors. See, e.g., the papers by Haukkanen [1], Li and Kim, [2, 3], Miguel [5], Sita Ramaiah [8], Tărnăuceanu [9], the author [10, 11].
2 Main results
We prove the following results. The first one is a direct generalization of Menon’s identity, not involving characters, which will be used later in the proof. Let denote, as usual, the Möbius function and let denote the Dirichlet convolution of arithmetic functions.
Theorem 2.1**.**
Let , such that . Let be an even function (mod ). Then
[TABLE]
If , where is an arbitrary arithmetic function, and , then from (2.1) we reobtain the identity due to Sita Ramaiah [8, Th. 9.1] in the more general setting of regular arithmetic convolutions.
Corollary 2.2**.**
Let , such that . Then
[TABLE]
If and , then (2.2) reduces to Menon’s identity (1.2).
Corollary 2.3**.**
Let , such that . Then
[TABLE]
If , then (2.3) gives the first identity of the known formulas
[TABLE]
the second one being the Brauer-Rademacher identity. See [4, Ch. 2].
Theorem 2.4**.**
Let be a Dirichlet character (mod ) with conductor (, ). Let be an even function (mod ) and let . Then
[TABLE]
where is the primitive character (mod ) that induces .
Corollary 2.5**.**
Let be a Dirichlet character (mod ) with conductor (, ) and let . Then
[TABLE]
If , then (2.4) reduces to the identity (1.1) of Zhao and Cao [13]. If is the principal character (mod ), that is , then (2.4) gives
[TABLE]
valid for any . If , then the right hand side of (2.5) is , like in Menon’s classical identity (1.2).
Corollary 2.6**.**
Let be a Dirichlet character (mod ) with conductor (, ) and let . Then
[TABLE]
We remark that the sums in Theorem 2.4 and Corollaries 2.5 and 2.6 vanish provided that .
Theorem 2.7**.**
Let be a primitive Dirichlet character (mod ), where . Let be an even function (mod ) and let . Then
[TABLE]
The above results can be applied to other special even functions (mod ), as well. For example, we have
Corollary 2.8**.**
Let be a primitive Dirichlet character (mod ), where . Let be an arbitrary arithmetic function and let . Then
[TABLE]
In particular,
[TABLE]
where is the sum-of-divisors function, and
[TABLE]
It turns out that if is a multiplicative function and , then the sum (2.6) is also multiplicative in .
The sums in Theorem 2.7 and Corollary 2.8 vanish provided that .
3 Proofs
We need the following known results. For the first one see, e.g., [6, Th. 9.2].
Lemma 3.1**.**
Let be a Dirichlet character (mod ) with conductor . Then there is a unique primitive character (mod ) that induces . That is,
[TABLE]
For the next result see, e.g., [6, Th. 9.4]. However, it is not included in most of other textbooks. For the sake of completeness we present its (short) proof.
Lemma 3.2**.**
Let be a primitive character (mod ). Then for any , and any ,
[TABLE]
Proof of Lemma 3.2.
Since is a primitive character, for a given , there exists such that , (mod ) and . We have
[TABLE]
Here, since , as runs through a complete residue system (mod ), the numbers run through a complete residue system (mod ), where (mod ). Hence,
[TABLE]
Since , it follows that . ∎
Proof of Theorem 2.1.
If and (mod ), then . Therefore, the sum is empty in the case .
Now assume that . Since is an even function (mod ),
[TABLE]
We have
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
According to (3.1),
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Let be fixed. The linear congruence (mod ) has solutions in if and only if , equivalent to , since . Similarly, the congruence (mod ) has solutions in if and only if . The above two congruences have common solutions in if and only if . Furthermore, if and are solutions of these simultaneous congruences, then (mod ) and (mod ). This gives (mod ), since , and (mod ). That is, (mod ), the least common multiple of and . We conclude that there are
[TABLE]
solutions (mod ). Therefore, the value of the last sum in (3.2) is .
We deduce that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Here the inner sum is
[TABLE]
which equals in the case and zero otherwise. We obtain that
[TABLE]
∎
Proof of Corollary 2.2.
Apply Theorem 2.1. Let . Then for every we have
[TABLE]
∎
Proof of Corollary 2.3.
Apply Theorem 2.1. Select and use the familiar formula
[TABLE]
It follows that for any . Also see [12, Sect. 3]. ∎
Proof of Theorem 2.4.
We have, according to Lemma 3.1,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Now, by using Theorem 2.1,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Here, by Lemma 3.2 the inner sum is zero, unless , that is , and in this case the inner sum is . We deduce that
[TABLE]
which vanishes if . ∎
Proof of Corollary 2.5.
Apply Theorem 2.4 to , where for every . ∎
Proof of Corollary 2.6.
Apply Theorem 2.4 by selecting . See the proof of Corollary 2.3. ∎
Proof of Theorem 2.7.
This is a direct consequence of Theorem 2.4 by taking . A short direct proof is the following: by using (3.1) and Lemma 3.2 we have
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
∎
Proof of Corollary 2.8.
Use Theorem 2.7. Select and then and , respectively. ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] P. Haukkanen, Menon’s identity with respect to a generalized divisibility relation, Aequationes Math. 70 (2005), 240–246.
- 2[2] Y. Li and D. Kim, A Menon-type identity with many tuples of group of units in residually finite Dedekind domains, J. Number Theory 175 (2017), 42–50.
- 3[3] Y. Li and D. Kim, Menon-type identities derived from actions of subgroups of general linear groups, J. Number Theory 179 (2017), 97–112.
- 4[4] P. J. Mc Carthy, Introduction to Arithmetical Functions, Springer, 1986.
- 5[5] C. Miguel, A Menon-type identity in residually finite Dedekind domains, J. Number Theory 164 (2016), 43–51.
- 6[6] H. L. Montgomery and R. C. Vaughan, Multiplicative Number Theory I. Classical Theory , Cambridge University Press, 2007.
- 7[7] W. Schwarz and J. Spilker, Arithmetical functions, An introduction to elementary and analytic properties of arithmetic functions and to some of their almost-periodic properties , London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 184. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
- 8[8] V. Sita Ramaiah, Arithmetical sums in regular convolutions, J. Reine Angew. Math. 303/304 (1978), 265–283.
