Complete colorings of planar graphs
M. Gabriela Araujo-Pardo, F. Esteban Contreras-Mendoza, Sara J., Murillo-Garc\'ia, Andrea B. Ramos-Tort, Christian Rubio-Montiel

TL;DR
This paper investigates the maximum number of colors used in complete colorings of various classes of planar and surface-embedded graphs, providing tight bounds and asymptotic results.
Contribution
It offers new asymptotic bounds and lower bounds for the achromatic and pseudoachromatic numbers of planar, outerplanar, and surface-embedded graphs.
Findings
Asymptotically tight bounds for maximal embedded graphs.
Lower bounds for achromatic and pseudoachromatic numbers.
Results extend to graphs of girth 4 and on surfaces.
Abstract
In this paper, we study the achromatic and the pseudoachromatic numbers of planar and outerplanar graphs as well as planar graphs of girth 4 and graphs embedded on a surface. We give asymptotically tight results and lower bounds for maximal embedded graphs.
| Platonic graphs | Upper bound | ||||
| Tetrahedral | since it is . | ||||
| Cubical | If a complete coloring contains a color class of size , | ||||
| , otherwise, then . | |||||
| Octahedral | It is the line graph of , see [3, 4]. | ||||
| Dodecahedral | If a complete coloring contains a color class of size , | ||||
| , otherwise, then . | |||||
| Icosahedral | If a complete coloring contains a color class of size , | ||||
| , otherwise, then . |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Complete colorings of planar graphs
G. Araujo-Pardo111Instituto de Matemáticas at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico. E-mail address: [email protected].
F. E. Contreras-Mendoza222Facultad de Ciencias at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico. E-mail addresses: [esteban.contreras.math|jani.murillo|ramos_tort]@ciencias.unam.mx.
S. J. Murillo-García 222Facultad de Ciencias at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico. E-mail addresses: [esteban.contreras.math|jani.murillo|ramos_tort]@ciencias.unam.mx.
A. B. Ramos-Tort 222Facultad de Ciencias at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico. E-mail addresses: [esteban.contreras.math|jani.murillo|ramos_tort]@ciencias.unam.mx.
C. Rubio-Montiel333División de Matemáticas e Ingeniería at FES Acatlán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 53150, State of Mexico, Mexico. E-mail address: [email protected].
Abstract
In this paper, we study the achromatic and the pseudoachromatic numbers of planar and outerplanar graphs as well as planar graphs of girth 4 and graphs embedded on a surface. We give asymptotically tight results and lower bounds for maximal embedded graphs.
Keywords: achromatic number, pseudoachromatic number, outerplanar graphs, thickness, outerthickness, girth-thickness, graphs embeddings.
1 Introduction
A -coloring of a finite and simple graph is a surjective function that assigns to each vertex of a color from a set of colors. A -coloring of a graph is called proper if any two adjacent vertices have different colors, and it is called complete if every pair of colors appears on at least one pair of adjacent vertices.
The chromatic number of is the smallest number for which there exists a proper -coloring of . Note that every proper -coloring of a graph is a complete coloring, otherwise, if two colors and have no edge in common, recolor the vertices colored with obtaining a proper -coloring of which is a contradiction.
The achromatic number of is the largest number for which there exists a proper and complete -coloring of . The pseudoachromatic number of is the largest number for which there exists a complete, not necessarily proper, -coloring of , see [10]. From the definitions,
[TABLE]
The origin of achromatic numbers dates back to the 1960s, when Harary, et al. [19] used them in the studied of homomorphism into the complete graph and Gupta [15] proved bounds on the sum of the chromatic, achromatic and pseudoachromatic numbers of a graph and its complement. Observe that if a graph has a complete -coloring, then must contain at least edges. Consequently, for a graph with edges and , and then (see [12])
[TABLE]
Some results about these parameters can be found in [1, 3, 4, 5, 11].
A graph is planar if can be drawn, or embedded, in the plane without any two of its edges crossing. Planar graphs and their colorings have been the main topic of intensive research since the beginnings of graph theory because of their connection to the well-known four color problem [12, 22]. Planar graphs are closely related to outerplanar graphs, namely, a graph is outerplanar if there exists a planar embedding of so that every vertex of lies on the boundary of the exterior face of . A planar graph of order has size at most , and if its order is and its girth is , has size at most (see [13]), while an outerplanar graph has size at most . Hence, Equation 2 gives the following upper bounds in terms of the number of vertices.
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
In this research, we study the relation between the achromatic and pseudoachromatic numbers and planar graphs, outerplanar graphs and planar graphs of girth at least 4, in order to do this, we use the concept of thickness, outerthickness and 4-girth-thickness, respectively. The thickness of a graph is defined as the least number of planar subgraphs whose union is . This parameter was studied in complete graphs, firstly, by Beineke and Harary in [8, 9] (see also [7, 25]) and by Alekseev and Gončakov in [2]; these authors gave specific constructions of planar graphs to decompose the complete graph using specific matrices. The outerthickness of is defined similarly to but with outerplanar instead of planar [16, 17]. Analogously, the -girth-thickness of a graph also is defined similarly to but using planar subgraphs of girth at least instead of planar subgraphs [23]. Some previous results for complete colorings in planar and outerplanar graphs were obtained by Balogh, et al. in [6] for the parameter called the Grundy number.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we use the thickness of the complete graph to prove that the upper bounds of Equation 3 is tight for planar graphs. For the sake of completeness, we give a decomposition of , in a combinatorial way, in order to obtain its thickness. We also prove any maximal planar graph of vertices has pseudoachromatic number of order . In summary, we prove the following theorem.
Theorem 1**.**
i) For and , there exists a planar graph of order such that
[TABLE]
ii) For , there exists a planar graph of order such that
[TABLE]
iii) For some integer and any maximal planar graph of order ,
[TABLE]
While Theorem 1 is about planar graphs, in Section 3, we prove the following theorem about outerplanar graphs.
Theorem 2**.**
i) For and , there exists an outerplanar graph of order such that
[TABLE]
ii) For , there exists an outerplanar graph of order such that
[TABLE]
iii) For some integer and any maximal outerplanar graph of order ,
[TABLE]
We remark that in [18], the authors prove a related result to iii) of Theorem 2, namely, for any maximal outerplanar graph of order and for any maximal outerplanar graph of order and with two vertices of degree 2.
Next, in Section 4, we prove the following theorem about planar graphs of girth at least 4.
Theorem 3**.**
i) For and , there exists a maximal planar graph of order and girth at least such that
[TABLE]
ii) For , there exists a planar graph of order and girth at least such that
[TABLE]
iii) For any , there exists a maximal planar graph of order with girth such that,
[TABLE]
In Section 5, we give results for graphs embedded on an surface in a similar way. Finally, in Section 6, we give the achromatic numbers of the Platonic graphs.
2 Planar graphs and the thickness of
In this section, we exhibit a planar graph with the property that its achromatic numbers attain the upper bound of Equation 3. To achieve it, we construct an almost maximal planar graph and color its vertices using essentially colors in a proper way such that there is exactly an edge between each pair of colors. Next, we give a general lower bound for the pseudoachromatic number of maximal planar graphs.
To begin with, we show that the thickness of and is , that is, both graphs are the union of planar subgraphs. Such a decomposition originally appears in [8], for a further explanation see [2, 9, 26]. In the following subsection, we give a pure combinatorial approach to that decomposition.
2.1 The planar decomposition of
A well-known result about complete graphs of even order is that these graphs are decomposable into a cyclic factorization of Hamiltonian paths, see [12]. In the remainder of this section, all sums are taken modulo .
Let be a complete graph of order . Label its vertex set as . Let be the Hamiltonian path with edges
[TABLE]
where . Such factorization of is the partition . Note that the center of has the edge , see Figure 1.
Consider the complete subgraphs , and of such that each of them has vertices, is a subgraph of and is . Label their vertex sets , and as , and , respectively.
Next, for any symbol of , we consider the cyclic factorization of into Hamiltonian paths and we denote as and the -subpaths of containing the leaves and , respectively.
Now, we construct the maximal planar subgraphs , ,…, and a matching , each of them of order , as follows.
Let be a perfect matching with edges , and for .
For , let be the spanning planar graph of whose adjacencies are given as follow: we take the 6 paths, and and insert them in the octahedron with vertices and as is shown in Figure 2 (Left). The vertex of each path is identified with the vertex in the corresponding triangle face and join all the other vertices of the path with both of the other vertices of the triangle face, see Figure 2 (Right).
Given the construction of , , see [2, 8] for details. Therefore, the resulting planar subgraphs show that . Hence, due to the fact that
The case of is based on this decomposition since is the join of and a new vertex . Hence, take the set of subgraphs , where is the join between the vertex and the matching (see Figure 3 for a drawing of ), to obtain a planar decomposition of using elements, then . Therefore due to the fact that .
2.2 On Theorem 1
In this subsection, we show the existence of a planar graph of order and color its vertices in a proper and complete way using colors in order to prove Theorem 1 i). Next, we prove Theorem 1 ii), i.e., the upper bound given in Equation 3 for planar graphs is asymptotically the best possible. Finally, we prove Theorem 1 iii), the natural question about a lower bound for the pseudoachromatic number of maximal planar graphs.
Proof of Theorem 1.
i) Consider the set of planar subgraphs of described in Subsection 2.1 but now, color each vertex with their corresponding label. Take a planar drawing of such that its colored vertices , and are the vertices of the exterior face, for . Next, take a planar drawing of (lying in the exterior face) identifying its colored vertices , and with the colored vertices , and of the exterior face, see Figure 3. The resulting planar graph has a proper and complete coloring with colors and order .
Indeed, the coloring is proper and complete due to fact that every pair of different colors and are the labels of the complete graph , the edge is an edge in some subplanar graph , ,…,, exactly once and then, there exists an edge of with colors and . Therefore . We call this colored graph as the optimal colored planar graph of vertices.
On the other hand, for , is equal to
[TABLE]
Since because and because it follows that
[TABLE]
Finally, we have
[TABLE]
and the result follows.
ii) Assume that for some natural number . Let be the planar graph of order constructed in the proof of Theorem 1 i); and let be the graph of order obtained by adding vertices to . It is clearly that is a planar graph of order with achromatic number . Since , we have that
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
and the result follows.
iii) If a maximal planar graph of order has a Hamiltonian cycle, for instance if is -connected [24], then its pseudoachromatic number is at least which is equal to , see [12, 20, 27]. In consequence, for some integer , if is a Hamiltonian maximal planar graph of order then
[TABLE]
On the other hand, since every maximal planar graph contains a matching of size at least [21] then its pseudoachromatic number is at least . Therefore, for some integer , if is a maximal planar graph of order then
[TABLE]
and the result follows. ∎
3 Outerplanar graphs and the outerthickness of
In this section, we prove Theorem 2 and we exhibit a decomposition of into outerplanar subgraphs, with a slightly different labelling than the original decomposition published in [17]. The proof of this theorem follows the same technique as previous one.
3.1 The outerplanar decomposition of
In order to show the outerplanar decomposition of , we use the labelling called boustrophedon of a path for , see Figure 4 (Left) and [17]. In the remainder of this section, all sums are taken modulo .
Label the vertex set as . First construct the path and the vertex is joined to each of the vertices of . Then, take three copies of the obtained graph, with the labels increased by , and . On identifying vertices having the same label , , and and adding the edge to obtain maximal outerplanar subgraphs , each of them of order for , and a matching of order with the edges for .
The resulting outerplanar subgraphs show that . Hence owing to the fact that .
3.2 On Theorem 2
The proof of Theorem 2 is given in this subsection. To prove i), we exhibit an outerplanar graph of order and color its vertices in a proper and complete way using colors. To prove ii), we show that for an arbitrary , the upper bound of Equation 4 is sharp for a given outerplanar graph of order . To prove iii), we show a lower bound for the pseudoachromatic number of maximal outerplanar graphs.
Proof of Theorem 2.
i) Consider the set of planar subgraphs of described in Subsection 3.1 and color each vertex with the corresponding label of the decomposition. For , take an outerplanar drawing of such that its vertices are in the exterior face. Next, take a planar drawing of (lying in the exterior face) identifying its colored vertices with the colored vertices of , for , and identifying its colored vertices with the colored vertices of , for , see Figure 5. The resulting planar graph has a proper and complete coloring with colors and order .
Indeed, the coloring is proper and complete because every pair of different colors and are the labels of the complete graph , the edge is an edge in some subplanar graph , ,…,, exactly once and then, there exists an edge of with colors and . Therefore .
On the other hand, for , is equal to Since because and because it follows that
[TABLE]
Finally, we have
[TABLE]
and the result follows.
ii) Let and be natural numbers such that , and let be the outerplanar graph of order constructed in the proof of Theorem 2 i). Let be the graph of order obtained by adding vertices to the exterior face of . Therefore is an outerplanar graph of order with achromatic number . Now, since then
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
and the result follows.
iii) Since a maximal outerplanar graph of order is Hamiltonian, its pseudoachromatic number is at least , see [12, 20, 27]. In conclusion, for some integer , if is a maximal outerplanar graph of order then
[TABLE]
and the result follows. ∎
4 Planar graphs of girth and the -girth-thickness of
In this section, we prove Theorem 3 and we exhibit a planar graph of girth with achromatic number the highest possible, after that, we use such graph to prove that the rather upper bound of Equation 5 is asymptotically correct, and to end, we show that the triangle-free condition is enough to obtain -graphs with constant achromatic numbers for arbitrary . Firstly, we show that the 4-girth-thickness of is , see [23].
4.1 The -girth-planar decomposition of
In order to show the -girth-planar decomposition of , we also use the cyclic factorization into Hamiltonian paths of presented in Section 2.1. In the remainder of this section, all sums are taken modulo .
Let and be the complete subgraphs of isomorphic to such that is the subgraph . Label their vertex sets and as and , respectively.
For any symbol of , we consider the cyclic factorizations .
Then we construct the planar subgraphs , ,…, of girth , order and size (observe that ), and also the perfect matching of order , as follows. Let be a spanning subgraph of with edges and
[TABLE]
where ; and let be the matching with edges for . Figure 6 shows that is a planar graph of girth at least . Note that each planar graph has a drawing with the vertices , , and in the exterior face.
The resulting planar subgraphs of girth at least show that . Hence because , see [23].
4.2 On Theorem 3
In this subsection is proven Theorem 3. To begin with, we show a planar graph of order and girth , and we color its vertices in a proper and complete way using colors. Next, we show that for any , the upper bound of Equation 5 is sharp for a given planar graph of order and girth . Finally, we show that for any maximal planar graph of girth has a tight constant lower bound.
Proof of Theorem 3.
i) Consider the set of planar subgraphs of described in Subsection 4.1 and color each vertex with the corresponding label of the decomposition. For , take a planar drawing of such that the vertices , , and are in the exterior face, see Figure 6 (Left).
Insert in the adjacent face to the exterior face of with vertices , , and and identify the colored vertices and of with the colored vertices and of , respectively. We call to the resulting graph , see Figure 7 (Left). Insert in the adjacent face to the exterior face of with vertices , , and and identify the colored vertices and of with the colored vertices and of , respectively. We call to the resulting graph . We repeat the procedure to obtain the graph .
Finally, insert every edge of , for , in some face with a vertex of colored and identify them, see Figure 7 (Right). The resulting planar graph has a proper and complete coloring with colors and order .
Indeed, the coloring is proper and complete because every pair of different colors and are the labels of the complete graph , the edge is an edge in some subplanar graph , ,…,, exactly once and then, there exists an edge of with colors and . Therefore .
On the other hand, for , is equal to Since since and since it follows that
[TABLE]
In conclusion, we have
[TABLE]
and the result follows.
ii) Let and be natural numbers such that , and let be the planar graph of order and girth constructed in the proof of Theorem 3 i). Let be the graph of order obtained by adding vertices to . Therefore is a planar graph of order with girth and achromatic number . Now, since then
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
and the result follows.
iii) Consider the bipartite graph of order . This graph is planar of girth with edges, therefore it is a maximal planar graph of girth . Its achromatic number is , see [12]. And its pseudoachromatic number is , otherwise, there exist at least two chromatic classes contained in the partition with vertices and then, the coloring is not complete. Since is a subgraph of and it has pseudoachromatic number is , the result follows. ∎
5 Graphs embedded on a surface
In this section, we present results for surfaces, specifically, we extend Theorem 1 to a surface instead of the plane.
To begin with, we establish some definitions. A surface is a topological space , which is compact arc-connected and Hausdorff, such that every point has a neighbourhood homeomorphic to the Euclidean plane .
An embedding of a graph in maps the vertices of to distinct points in and each edge of to an arc in , such that no inner point of such an arc is the image of a vertex or lies on another arc. A face of in is a component (arc-connected component) of where is the union of all those points and arcs of , and the subgraph of that maps to the frontier of this face is its boundary. When each face is (homeomorphic to) a disc and is its boundary, we say that is a maximal -graph.
For every surface there is an integer called the Euler characteristic such that whenever a graph with vertices and edges is embedded in so that there are faces and every face is a disc, then it is equal to .
We work instead with the invariant defined as and called the Euler genus of , see [13]. The well-known Classification Theorem of Surfaces says that, up to homeomorphism, every surface is a sphere with some finite number of handles or crosscaps.
Lemma 4** (See [13]).**
Adding a handle to a surface raises its Euler genus by 2. And adding a crosscap to a surface raises its Euler genus by 1.
Lemma 5** (See [14]).**
A crosshandle is homeomorphic to two crosscaps.
Lemma 6** (Dyck’s Theorem. See [14]).**
Handles and crosshandles are equivalent in the presence of a crosscap.
For any maximal -graph , , then and, by Equation 2
[TABLE]
We prove the following theorems.
Theorem 7**.**
Let be an orientable surface with handles.
i) For , with , there exists a graph of order , embeddable in the surface , such that
[TABLE]
ii) For , there exists an embeddable -graph of order such that
[TABLE]
Proof.
i) Consider the colored optimal planar graph of vertices embedded in the plane which was described in the proof of Theorem 1, see Figure 3. We proceed to add handles to the plane in the following way.
Cutting along a circle in the triangle face contained in the subgraph of and also along a circle in the face containing , which was the exterior face, for all . Now, add a handle connecting both circles. For each , we identify pairs of vertices with the same color, namely, the vertices and of the exterior face with the colored vertices and of the triangle face of , respectively, which is possible moving them through the handle, see Figure 8.
We obtain a surface with handles in which is embedded the graph of vertices and colored with colors, see Figure 9.
On the other hand, for , is equal to
[TABLE]
we have
[TABLE]
and the result follows.
ii) Assume that for some natural number . Let be the -graph of order constructed in the proof of Theorem 7 i); and let be the graph of order obtained by adding vertices to . It is clearly that is an -graph of order with achromatic number . Since , we have that
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
and the result follows. ∎
Theorem 8**.**
Let be a non-orientable surface with crosscaps and let be a function such that if is odd and otherwise.
i) For , with , there exists a graph of order , embeddable in a surface with crosscaps, such that
[TABLE]
ii) For , there exists an embeddable -graph of order such that
[TABLE]
Proof.
i) Consider the colored optimal planar graph of vertices embedded in the plane which was described in the proof of Theorem 1, see Figure 3. We proceed to add crosscaps to the plane in the following way.
Cutting along a circle in the triangle face contained in the subgraph of and also along a circle in the face containing , which was the exterior face, for all . Now, add a crosshandle connecting both circles. For each , we identify pairs of vertices with the same color, namely, the vertices and of the exterior face with the colored vertices and of the triangle face of , respectively, which is possible moving them through the crosshandle, see Figure 10.
If , we add a crosscap to some face. We obtain a surface with crosscaps in which is embedded the graph of vertices and colored with colors, see Figure 9.
On the other hand, for , is equal to
[TABLE]
Since because and because it follows that
[TABLE]
Finally, we have
[TABLE]
and the result follows.
ii) Assume that for some natural number . Let be the -graph of order constructed in the proof of Theorem 7 i); and let be the graph of order obtained by adding vertices to . It is clearly that is an -graph of order with achromatic number . Since , we have that
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
and the result follows. ∎
6 The Platonic graphs
In this section, we show the exact values of the achromatic numbers for the Platonic graphs.
We recall that a Platonic graph is the skeleton of a Platonic solid. The five Platonic graphs are the tetrahedral graph, cubical graph, octahedral graph, dodecahedral graph, and icosahedral graph. Table 1 shows their order, regularity and achromatic numbers in the columns 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. The last column explains how to get the upper bound .
The lower bound is illustrated in Figure 11 given by complete colorings of the Platonic graphs. The octahedral graph is twice because it has different values for the achromatic and pseudoachromatic numbers, respectively.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the anonymous referees of this paper for their suggestions and remarks.
Part of the work was done during the I Taller de Matemáticas Discretas, held at Campus-Juriquilla, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Querétaro City, Mexico on July 28–31, 2014. Part of the results of this paper was announced at the XXX Coloquio Víctor Neumann-Lara de Teoría de Gráficas, Combinatoria y sus Aplicaciones in Oaxaca, Mexico on March 2–6, 2015.
G. A-P. partially supported by CONACyT-Mexico, grant 282280; and PAPIIT-Mexico, grants IN106318, IN104915, IN107218. C. R-M. partially supported by PAPIIT-Mexico, grant IN107218 and PAIDI/007/18.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] O. Aichholzer, G. Araujo-Pardo, N. García-Colín, T. Hackl, D. Lara, C. Rubio-Montiel and J. Urrutia. Geometric achromatic and pseudoachromatic indices. Graphs Combin. , 32(2):431–451, 2016.
- 2[2] V. B. Alekseev and V. S. Gončakov. The thickness of an arbitrary complete graph. Mat. Sb. (N.S.) , 101(143)(2):212–230, 1976.
- 3[3] G. Araujo-Pardo, J. J. Montellano-Ballesteros, C. Rubio-Montiel and R. Strausz. On the pseudoachromatic index of the complete graph II. Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex. (3) , 20(1):17–28, 2014.
- 4[4] G. Araujo-Pardo, J. J. Montellano-Ballesteros, C. Rubio-Montiel and R. Strausz. On the pseudoachromatic index of the complete graph III. Graphs Combin. , 34(2):277–287, 2018.
- 5[5] G. Araujo-Pardo and C. Rubio-Montiel. Pseudoachromatic and connected-pseudoachromatic indices of the complete graph. Discrete Appl. Math. , 231:60–66, 2017.
- 6[6] J. Balogh, S. G. Hartke, Q. Liu and G. Yu. On the first-fit chromatic number of graphs. SIAM J. Discrete Math. , 22(3):887–900, 2008.
- 7[7] J. Battle, F. Harary and Y. Kodama. Every planar graph with nine points has a nonplanar complement. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. , 68:569–571, 1962.
- 8[8] L. W. Beineke and F. Harary. On the thickness of the complete graph. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. , 70:618–620, 1964.
