On the Diophantine equations $z^2=f(x)^2 \pm g(y)^2$ concerning Laurent polynomials
Yong Zhang, Arman Shamsi Zargar

TL;DR
This paper investigates rational solutions to specific Diophantine equations involving Laurent polynomials using elliptic curve theory, providing insights into their parametric solutions.
Contribution
It applies elliptic curve theory to analyze rational solutions of equations involving Laurent polynomials, a novel approach for these types of Diophantine equations.
Findings
Identification of conditions for rational solutions
Explicit parametric solutions for certain Laurent polynomials
Extension of elliptic curve methods to Laurent polynomial equations
Abstract
By the theory of elliptic curves, we study the nontrivial rational parametric solutions and rational solutions of the Diophantine equations for some simple Laurent polynomials and .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Advanced Mathematical Identities · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
On the Diophantine equations concerning Laurent polynomials
Yong Zhang
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, People's Republic of China
and
Arman Shamsi Zargar
Young Researchers and Elite Club, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran
(Date: May 22, 2017)
Abstract.
By the theory of elliptic curves, we study the nontrivial rational parametric solutions and rational solutions of the Diophantine equations for some simple Laurent polynomials and .
Key words and phrases:
Diophantine equations, Laurent polynomials, rational parametric solutions
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 11D72, 11D25; Secondary 11D41, 11G05
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11501052).
1. Introduction
In 2010, A. Togbe and M. Ulas [10] considered the rational solutions of the Diophantine equations
[TABLE]
where being quadratic and cubic polynomials. At the same year, B. He, A. Togbe and M. Ulas [6] further investigated the integer solutions of Eq. (1.1) for some special polynomials .
In 2016, Y. Zhang [11] studied the nontrivial rational parametric solutions of the Diophantine equations
[TABLE]
where concerning the Laurent polynomials . Moreover, we [12] considered the nontrivial rational parametric solutions and rational solutions of Eq. (1.1) for some simple Laurent polynomials .
In 2017, Sz. Tengely and M. Ulas [9] investigated the integer solutions of the Diophantine equations
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
for different polynomials and .
In this paper, we continue the study of [11] and [12], and consider the nontrivial rational parametric solutions and rational solutions of Eqs. (1.2) and (1.3) for some simple Laurent polynomials and . The nontrivial solution of Eqs. (1.2) and (1.3) respectively means that and .
Recall that a Laurent polynomial with coefficients in a field is an expression of the form
[TABLE]
where is a formal variable, the summation index is an integer (not necessarily positive) and only finitely many coefficients are nonzero. Here we mainly care about the simple Laurent polynomials
[TABLE]
with nonzero integers . In the sequel, without losing the generality we may assume that , guaranteed by the shape of Eqs. (1.2) and (1.3).
By the theory of elliptic curves, we give a positive answer to the Question 3.3 of [12], and prove
Theorem 1.1**.**
For and with nonzero integers , Eq. (1.2) or Eq. (1.3) has infinitely many nontrivial rational parametric solutions.
Theorem 1.2**.**
For and with nonzero integers , Eq. (1.2) or Eq. (1.3) has infinitely many nontrivial rational parametric solutions.
Theorem 1.3**.**
For and with nonzero integers , Eq. (1.2) or Eq. (1.3) has infinitely many nontrivial rational solutions.
Theorem 1.4**.**
For and with nonzero integers , Eq. (1.2) or Eq. (1.3) has infinitely many nontrivial rational solutions.
2. The proofs of Theorems
Proof of Theorem 1.1..
For and , let
[TABLE]
Then Eq. (1.2) equals
[TABLE]
Let and consider the curve . In order to prove Theorem 1.1 we must show that the curve has infinitely many -rational points. The curve is a quartic curve with rational point . By the method of Fermat [4, p. 639], using the point we can produce another point , which satisfies the condition . In order to construct a such point , we put
[TABLE]
where are indeterminate variables. Then
[TABLE]
where the quantities are given by
[TABLE]
The system of equations in has a solution given by
[TABLE]
This implies that the equation
[TABLE]
has the rational roots and
[TABLE]
Then we have the point with
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Again, using the method of Fermat, we let
[TABLE]
and get another on the curve . Repeating the above process any numbers of times completes the proof of Theorem 1.1 for Eq. (1.2). The same method can be used to give a proof for Eq. (1.3).
∎
Proof of Theorem 1.2..
For and , let
[TABLE]
Then Eq. (1.2) leads to
[TABLE]
Let and consider the curve . In order to prove Theorem 1.2 we must show that the curve has infinitely many -rational points. The curve is a quartic curve with rational point . By the method of Fermat [4, p. 639], and using the point we can produce another point satisfying the condition . In order to construct a such point , we take
[TABLE]
where are indeterminate variables. Then
[TABLE]
where the quantities are given by
[TABLE]
The system of equations in has a solution given by
[TABLE]
This implies that the equation
[TABLE]
has the rational roots and
[TABLE]
Then we have the point with
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Applying the method of Fermat, we take
[TABLE]
and obtain another point on the curve . Repeating the above process any numbers of times completes the proof of Theorem 1.2 for Eq. (1.2). The same method can be used to give a proof for Eq. (1.3). ∎
Proof of Theorem 1.3..
For and , set
[TABLE]
Then Eq. (1.2) reduces to
[TABLE]
To prove the theorem, let us consider the curve
[TABLE]
Note that the point lies on , then it can be parameterized by
[TABLE]
where is a rational parameter. Hence,
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
This completes the proof of Theorem 1.3 for Eq. (1.2). A similar method for Eq. (1.3). ∎
Proof of Theorem 1.4..
For and , put
[TABLE]
Then Eq. (1.2) equals
[TABLE]
To prove the theorem, consider the curve
[TABLE]
The curve is a quartic curve with rational point . By the method of Fermat [4, p. 639], and using the point , we can produce another point , which satisfies the condition . In order to construct a such point , we put
[TABLE]
where are indeterminate variables. Then
[TABLE]
where the quantities are given by
[TABLE]
The system of equations in has a solution given by
[TABLE]
This implies the equation
[TABLE]
has the rational roots and
[TABLE]
Then we have the point , where
[TABLE]
Using the method of Fermat, we let
[TABLE]
and find another point on the curve . Repeat the above process any numbers of times, this completes the proof of Theorem 1.4 for Eq. (1.2). The same method for giving a proof for Eq. (1.3). ∎
3. Some related questions
We have studied the rational parametric solutions and rational solutions of Eqs. (1.2) and (1.3) for and , but we don't get the same results for other Laurent polynomials.
Question 3.1**.**
For or , do Eqs. (1.2) and (1.3) have rational solutions? If they have, are there infinitely many?
Finding the integer solutions of Eqs. (1.2) and (1.3) is also an interesting question.
Question 3.2**.**
Does there exist a Laurent polynomial such that Eqs. (1.2) and (1.3) have infinitely many integer solutions?
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] W. Bosma, J. Cannon and C. Playoust, The Magma algebra system. I. The user language , J. Symbolic Comput. 24 (1997), 235–265.
- 2[2] H. Cohen, Number theory, Vol. I: Tools and Diophantine equations , Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 239, Springer, New York, 2007.
- 3[3] I. Connell, Elliptic curve handbook , http://www.math.mcgill.ca/connell/. 1998. (or https: //pendientedemigracion.ucm.es/BUCM/mat/doc 8354.pdf)
- 4[4] L. E. Dickson, History of the theory of numbers, Vol. II: Diophantine analysis , Dover Publications, New York, 2005.
- 5[5] R. K. Guy, Unsolved Problems in Number Theory , 3rd edition, Springer Science, 2004.
- 6[6] B. He, A. Togbe and M. Ulas, On the diophantine equation z 2 = f ( x ) 2 ± f ( y ) 2 superscript 𝑧 2 plus-or-minus 𝑓 superscript 𝑥 2 𝑓 superscript 𝑦 2 z^{2}=f(x)^{2}\pm f(y)^{2} , II , Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 82(2) (2010), 187–204.
- 7[7] L. J. Mordell, Diophantine Equations , Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 30, Academic Press, London, 1969.
- 8[8] J. H. Silverman and J. Tate, Rational Points on Elliptic Curves , Springer, 1992.
