Recognizing difference quotients of real functions
Trevor Richards, Jimmy Yau

TL;DR
This paper explores methods to identify when a two-variable function is a difference quotient of a real function and provides techniques to reconstruct the original function from it.
Contribution
It introduces three independent methods to recognize difference quotients and recover the original functions, advancing understanding of their characterization.
Findings
Developed three methods for recognizing difference quotients.
Provided techniques for reconstructing original functions from difference quotients.
Enhanced understanding of the structure of difference quotients.
Abstract
For a real function , the difference quotient of is the function of two real variables , which we view as defined on the triangle . In this paper we investigate how to determine whether a given function of two variables is the difference quotient of some real function . We develop three independent methods for recognizing such a function as a difference quotient, and corresponding methods for recovering the underlying function from .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeromorphic and Entire Functions · Functional Equations Stability Results · Advanced Banach Space Theory
Recognizing difference quotients of real functions.
Trevor Richards, Jimmy Yau111This paper represents the content of the second author’s undergraduate research project while at Washington and Lee University in the Fall term of 2015 and the Winter term of 2016, under the direction of the first author.
Abstract
For a real function , the difference quotient of is the function of two real variables , which we view as defined on the triangle . In this paper we investigate how to determine whether a given function of two variables is the difference quotient of some real function . We develop three independent methods for recognizing such a function as a difference quotient, and corresponding methods for recovering the underlying function from .
1 Introduction
Given a function defined at two distinct points , the difference quotient of from to is the slope of the line segment connecting points and . This we denote as
[TABLE]
However, simplification and rearrangement of may leave this function in a form that is unrecognizable as a difference quotient. Therefore, it is desirable to develop some means to determine whether a given function of two variables is the difference quotient of some function and, if so, a method for recovering from . We will give three such tests for whether is equal to for some , and also corresponding methods to recover from .
Throughout this paper, all variables are taken to be real, and all functions are assumed to take real values. We will restrict our attention to functions having domain . Therefore we will consider to have as its domain either the square , or some subset thereof. Of course, if the difference quotient extends continuously to the diagonal
[TABLE]
then must be differentiable and on .
The tests we provide are presented in an increasing order of specificity with regard to the sort of functions to which they may be applied, and along the way, we will give concrete examples of functions which we may test.
The first criteria, which we call the Algebraic Criteria and prove in Section 2, is meant to detect the difference quotient of a completely arbitrary real function . Therefore the function is not expected to be defined on . It must, however, be symmetric (ie ) in order to be a difference quotient, so, rather than include symmetry as a part of the criteria, we merely assume that is defined only on the upper triangle
[TABLE]
If we wish to extend to the lower triangle we may do so symmetrically by defining for .
Theorem 1** (Algebraic Criteria).**
Let be given. Then the following are equivalent:
There exists some such that . 2. 2.
For all ,
[TABLE] 3. 3.
For all ,
[TABLE]
In the proof of Theorem 1, which we give in Section 2, we construct the underlying function assuming satisfies the second and third items of Theorem 1. We enshrine that construction in the following corollary.
Corollary 2**.**
For satisfying Items 2 and 3 of Theorem 1, the functions which make are all functions of the form
[TABLE]
for a constant .
We observe furthermore that the expression
[TABLE]
from Item 2 of Theorem 1 may be rewritten as
[TABLE]
The left hand side of this equation may easily be recognized as the determinant of the matrix
[TABLE]
which will be referred to in Corollary 3 below. From this observation, we extract several secondary tests, which follow from Theorem 1. It is interesting to point out that, in the case for some function , the dimension and null set of are in fact independent of .
Corollary 3**.**
Let be given. The following are equivalent:
There exists some such that . 2. 2.
For all , . 3. 3.
For all , . 4. 4.
For all , .
We now turn our attention to the difference quotients of differentiable functions . If is differentiable, then its difference quotient may now defined on by
[TABLE]
With this definition in mind, we obtain the following test, which we call the Integrable Criteria and prove in Section 3.
Theorem 4** (Integrable Criteria).**
Let be given, such that the function is (Lebesgue) integrable on . Then the following are equivalent:
There exists some such that . 2. 2.
For all ,
[TABLE]
As with the Algebraic Criteria, the proof of the Integrable Criteria consists of an explicit construction of the functions for which . This construction is recorded as the following corollary.
Corollary 5**.**
For satisfying Item 2 of Theorem 4, the functions which make are all functions of the form
[TABLE]
for a constant .
In Section 3, we will also observe that, for a differentiable function , the sum of the first partial derivatives of the difference quotient of is the difference quotient of .
Theorem 6**.**
Let be differentiable on . Then
[TABLE]
Our final test, which we call the Summation Criteria and will prove in Section 4, is designed to detect the difference quotient of an analytic function . The key observation is that the difference quotient of the function is exactly
[TABLE]
Theorem 7** (Summation Criteria).**
Let be an analytic function on . The following are equivalent:
There exists some such that . 2. 2.
For each there exists a constant such that for all with , .
As with the earlier criteria, for functions that satisfy the items of Theorem 7, we obtain an explicit construction of the functions that will make .
Corollary 8**.**
For satisfying Item 2 of Theorem 7, the functions which make are all functions of the form
[TABLE]
for a constant .
2 Algebraic Criteria
The Algebraic Criteria is the most general of the tests we will develop in this paper. It is designed to detect the difference quotient of an arbitrary function , and thus, the function being tested need only be defined on the upper triangle .
For such a function , we will show that the following items are equivalent.
Algebraic Criteria
There exists some such that . 2. 2.
For all ,
[TABLE] 3. 3.
For all ,
[TABLE]
The fact that Item 1 implies Item 2 follows directly from the definition of the difference quotient, and of course Item 2 implies Item 3 after setting . Therefore, we proceed to a more interesting fact that Item 3 implies Item 1.
For a fixed constant , we define by
[TABLE]
With this choice of , we will show that Item 3 implies . Note that it is easy to show that two real valued functions have the same difference quotient if and only if they differ by a constant. Therefore showing that will immediately establish Corollary 2 as well.
Proof.
Assume that Item 3 of the Algebraic Criteria holds, and let be given. We wish to show that, for the function defined above, . We have two values of to check:
Case :
[TABLE]
Case : Note that the condition present in Item 3 of the Algebraic Criteria may be rearranged to give that, for all ,
[TABLE]
We therefore have that
[TABLE]
This establishes the desired result.
∎
2.1 Application to Linear Algebra
Continuing with our analysis of an arbitrary function defined on , for any , we define the matrix
[TABLE]
We will now show the equivalence of the following items from Corollary 3.
There exists some such that . 2. 2.
For all , . 3. 3.
For all , . 4. 4.
For all , .
It may easily be shown that the condition in Item 2 of the Algebraic Criteria may be rewritten as the condition . Therefore, the Algebraic Criteria gives us the equivalence of Items 1 and 2 from Corollary 3. Moreover, basic linear algebra shows that, among the items of Corollary 3, Item 4 implies Item 3, which in turn implies Item 2. Thus, we have the following implications.
[TABLE]
We will establish the remaining implications by showing that Item 1 of Corollary 3 implies Item 4 of Corollary 3.
Proof.
We begin by assuming that Item 1 holds. We therefore replace with in the matrix and seek the solution set for the following matrix equation.
[TABLE]
Pulling this matrix equation apart componentwise, we obtain the following system of scalar equations.
[TABLE]
Applying standard algebraic techniques to the latter two equations, we may solve for each of and in terms of , obtaining the following.
[TABLE]
Thus, is contained in the set
[TABLE]
However, it is easy to check that any vector in this set is also in . This completes our proof.
∎
2.2 Example
For , define
[TABLE]
We will verify that this function satisfies the third item of the Algebraic Criteria, and is therefore the difference quotient of some function . We will then use Corollary 2 to find the function .
Let be given. We have four cases to check.
Case :
[TABLE]
Case :
[TABLE]
Case :
[TABLE]
Case :
[TABLE]
Since satisfies the Algebraic Criteria, we know that is the difference quotient of a function . We may apply Corollary 2, choosing , to find one such . That is, , where
[TABLE]
Thus, we have , and if then, by the definition of , we have
[TABLE]
Combining cases and simplifying, we see that is the difference quotient of the Dirichlet function
[TABLE]
3 Integrable Criteria
In this section we extend the definition of the difference quotient of to the diagonal by , provided that the derivative exists. With this definition, the fundamental theorem of calculus now suggests the Integrable Criteria, which may be used to detect whether a function defined on the closed triangle
[TABLE]
is the difference quotient of a differentiable function. The Integrable Criteria states that for such a function , the following are equivalent.
Integrable Criteria
There exists some such that on . 2. 2.
The function is integrable on , and for all ,
[TABLE]
The fact that Item 1 implies Item 2 follows directly from the fundamental theorem of calculus. It remains to prove the reverse implication.
Proof.
Assume that the function satisfies the assumptions of the second item of the Integrable Criteria. Define the function by
[TABLE]
Then, by the additivity of the integral, we have
[TABLE]
By rearranging the equation in Item 2 of the Integrable Criteria, we immediately obtain . ∎
Since all functions having the same difference quotient vary only by a constant, we immediately obtain the conclusion found in Corollary 5.
3.1 Example
For , define to be the average value of on the interval . It therefore makes sense to extend this definition to the diagonal by , for .
We check that Item 2 of the Integrable Criteria is satisfied.
Let be given. The basic calculus definition of average value of on the interval is
[TABLE]
Thus we have
[TABLE]
Finally, according to Corollary 5, we have that one of the functions which makes is
[TABLE]
3.2 Sum of Partial Derivatives
In this subsection we make note that the sum of the partial derivatives of is equal to
[TABLE]
That is, if we define to be the set of all differentiable functions from to , to be the set of functions mapping to both of whose partial derivatives exist, to be the set of functions from to , and to be the set of functions from to , then the following diagram commutes.
[TABLE]
Proof.
Using the quotient rule, we observe that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Thus a bit of arithmetic immediately gives
[TABLE]
∎
4 Summation Criteria
Our final test is meant to detect the difference quotient of an analytic function. It comes from the basic observation that the difference quotient of the function is
[TABLE]
We see that this is the sum of all terms of the form such that and . This observation gives rise to the Summation Criteria, which states for power series
[TABLE]
converging absolutely on the closed triangle , that the following are equivalent.
Summation Criteria
There exists some such that on . 2. 2.
For each there exists a constant such that for all with , .
The fact that Item 1 implies Item 2 follows immediately from the observation above regarding the difference quotient of a power of . It therefore remains to show that Item 2 implies Item 1.
Proof.
Assume that Item 2 of the Summation Criteria holds and define by
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
Observe that for each , and for each , setting we have . Therefore, the latter sum may be rewritten
[TABLE]
This is indeed a reordering of the power series
[TABLE]
Since was assumed to be absolutely convergent on , reorderings of are equal to , so we have
[TABLE]
∎
4.1 Example
For define
[TABLE]
Before applying the Summation Criteria to , we must verify that converges absolutely on the closed triangle Since each is positive and , we have
[TABLE]
We regroup the summation as follows.
[TABLE]
Looking at the inner summation, we observe that
[TABLE]
Thus, we rewrite
[TABLE]
Finally, the ratio test guarantees the convergence of , so we conclude that does converge absolutely on .
We observe that, by setting for all , if with , then , so that the second item of the Summation Criteria is satisfied. Using Corollary 8, we find one of the functions for which is
[TABLE]
We recognize the series above as the expansion for .
