Integral means of holomorphic functions as generic log-convex weights
Evgueni Doubtsov

TL;DR
This paper constructs holomorphic functions on the unit ball in complex space whose integral means are equivalent to given log-convex weights, extending understanding of weighted spaces of holomorphic functions.
Contribution
It introduces a method to realize any log-convex weight as the integral mean of a holomorphic function on the unit ball in complex space.
Findings
Constructed functions with prescribed integral mean behavior
Established equivalence between integral means and log-convex weights
Extended results to volume integral means
Abstract
Let denote the space of holomorphic functions on the unit ball of , . Given a log-convex strictly positive weight on , we construct a function such that the standard integral means and are equivalent for any . Also, we obtain similar results related to volume integral means.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHolomorphic and Operator Theory · Analytic and geometric function theory · Meromorphic and Entire Functions
Integral means of holomorphic functions as generic log-convex weights
Evgueni Doubtsov
St. Petersburg Department of V.A. Steklov Mathematical Institute, Fontanka 27, St. Petersburg 191023, Russia
Department of Mathematics and Mechanics, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetski pr. 28, St. Petersburg 198504, Russia
Abstract.
Let denote the space of holomorphic functions on the unit ball of , . Given a log-convex strictly positive weight on , we construct a function such that the standard integral means and are equivalent for any . Also, we obtain similar results related to volume integral means.
The author was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant No. 14-41-00010).
1. Introduction
Let denote the space of holomorphic functions on the unit ball of , . For and , the standard integral means are defined as
[TABLE]
where denotes the normalized Lebesgue measure on the unit sphere . For , put
[TABLE]
A function is called a weight if is continuous and non-decreasing. A weight is said to be log-convex if is a convex function of , . It is known that , , is a log-convex weight for any , , , . In fact, for , this result constitutes the classical Hardy convexity theorem (see [2]). The corresponding proofs are extendable to all dimensions , (see, for example [7, Lemma 1]).
In the present paper, for each , we show that the functions , , , are generic log-convex weights in the sense of the following equivalence:
Let . We say that and are equivalent (, in brief) if there exist constants such that
[TABLE]
Theorem 1.1**.**
Let and let be a log-convex weight. There exists such that
[TABLE]
for each .
Also, we consider volume integral means for . The logarithmic convexity properties for such integral means have been recently investigated in a series of papers (see, for example, [5, 6, 7]). Applying Theorem 1.1, we obtain, in particular, the following result.
Corollary 1.2**.**
Let , and let be a weight. The following properties are equivalent:
- (i)
* is equivalent to a log-convex weight on ;*
- (ii)
there exists such that
[TABLE]
where denotes the normalized volume measure on .
Organization of the paper
Section 2 is devoted to the proof of Theorem 1.1. Corollary 1.2 and other results related to volume integral means are obtained in Section 3.
2. Proof of Theorem 1.1
Put and . For a log-convex weight on , Theorem 1.2 from [1] provides functions such that , . These functions are almost sufficient for a proof of Theorem 1.1 with . However, we will need additional technical information contained in [1]. Namely, applying Lemma 2.2 from [1] and arguing as in the proof of Theorem 1.2 from [1], we obtain the following lemma.
Lemma 2.1**.**
Let be a log-convex weight on . There exist , , , and constants , with the following properties:
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Proof of Theorem 1.1.
We are given a log-convex weight on . First, assume that . Let and , , and be those provided by Lemma 2.1. By (2.3),
[TABLE]
Using (2.1) and integrating the above inequality with respect to Lebesgue measure on , we obtain
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
So, by (2.1), we have
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Also, (2.2) guarantees that
[TABLE]
Hence, , . Combining these estimates and (2.4), we conclude that . Thus, , , for any .
Also, we claim that for any . Indeed, (2.4) and (2.5) guarantee that
[TABLE]
Therefore, , . So, the proof of the theorem is finished for .
Now, assume that . Let , , be a Ryll–Wojtaszczyk sequence (see [3]). By definition, is a holomorphic homogeneous polynomial of degree , and for a constant which does not depend on . Put
[TABLE]
Clearly, (2.2) guarantees that , , . Also, the polynomials , , are mutually orthogonal in ; hence, , . So, arguing as in the case , we conclude that for any , as required. ∎
As indicated in the introduction, for any , the function is log-convex; hence, Theorem 1.1 implies the following analog of Corollary 1.2.
Corollary 2.2**.**
Let , and let be a weight. The following properties are equivalent:
- (i)
* is equivalent to a log-convex weight on ;*
- (ii)
there exists such that
[TABLE]
3. Volume integral means
In this section, we consider integral means based on volume integrals. Recall that denotes the normalized volume measure on the unit ball . For , and a continuous function , define
[TABLE]
Proposition 3.1**.**
Let and let be log-convex weights. There exists such that
[TABLE]
Proof.
By Theorem 1.1 with , there exist , , such that
[TABLE]
Let
[TABLE]
The functions and are correctly defined log-convex weights on . Hence, is a log-convex weight as the product of two log-convex weights. By Theorem 1.1, there exists such that
[TABLE]
or, equivalently,
[TABLE]
Representing in polar coordinates and integrating the above estimates with respect to , we obtain
[TABLE]
as required. ∎
Clearly, Proposition 3.1 is of special interest if is log-convex or equivalent to a log-convex function for any . Also, we have to prove Corollary 1.2. So, assume that and define
[TABLE]
where .
Proof of Corollary 1.2.
By Proposition 3.1, (i) implies (ii). To prove the reverse implication, assume that is a weight on and for some , .
If and , then is log-convex by Theorem 1 from [5]. So, (ii) implies (i) for . The function is also log-convex if and . Indeed, we have
[TABLE]
Thus, Taylor’s Banach space method applies (see [4, Theorem 3.3]).
Now, assume that and . The function is a log-convex weight. Hence, by Theorem 1.1 with , there exist , , such that
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
In other words, is equivalent to a log-convex weight on . So, (ii) implies (i) for all and . The proof of the corollary is finished. ∎
For , Proposition 3.1 also applies to the following integral means:
[TABLE]
However, in general, the above integral means are not log-convex.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] E. Abakumov and E. Doubtsov, Moduli of holomorphic functions and logarithmically convex radial weights , Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 47 (2015), no. 3, 519–532.
- 2[2] G. H. Hardy, The mean value of the modulus of an analytic function , Proc. London Math. Soc. 14 (1914), 269–277.
- 3[3] J. Ryll and P. Wojtaszczyk, On homogeneous polynomials on a complex ball , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 276 (1983), no. 1, 107–116.
- 4[4] A. E. Taylor, New proofs of some theorems of Hardy by Banach space methods , Math. Mag. 23 (1950), 115–124.
- 5[5] Ch. Wang, J. Xiao, and K. Zhu, Logarithmic convexity of area integral means for analytic functions II , J. Aust. Math. Soc. 98 (2015), no. 1, 117–128.
- 6[6] Ch. Wang and K. Zhu, Logarithmic convexity of area integral means for analytic functions , Math. Scand. 114 (2014), no. 1, 149–160.
- 7[7] J. Xiao and K. Zhu, Volume integral means of holomorphic functions , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 139 (2011), no. 4, 1455–1465.
