Upper bounds on the smallest size of a complete cap in $\mathrm{PG}(N,q)$, $N\ge3$, under a certain probabilistic conjecture
Alexander A. Davydov, Giorgio Faina, Stefano Marcugini, Fernanda, Pambianco

TL;DR
This paper derives new probabilistic upper bounds on the smallest size of complete caps in projective spaces over finite fields, based on a conjecture about the distribution of uncovered points.
Contribution
It introduces a probabilistic conjecture and rigorously proves bounds for part of the iterative construction of complete caps in PG(N,q).
Findings
New upper bounds on the size of complete caps in PG(N,q) for N≥3.
Connection established between cap sizes and the Birthday problem.
Bounds validated through comparison with computational data.
Abstract
In the projective space over the Galois field of order , , an iterative step-by-step construction of complete caps by adding a new point on every step is considered. It is proved that uncovered points are evenly placed on the space. A natural conjecture on an estimate of the number of new covered points on every step is done. For a part of the iterative process, this estimate is proved rigorously. Under the conjecture mentioned, new upper bounds on the smallest size of a complete cap in are obtained, in particular, \begin{align*} t_{2}(N,q)<\frac{\sqrt{q^{N+1}}}{q-1}\left(\sqrt{(N+1)\ln q}+1\right)+2\thicksim q^\frac{N-1}{2}\sqrt{(N+1)\ln q},\quad N\ge3. \end{align*} A connection with the Birthday problem is noted. The effectiveness of the new bounds is illustrated by comparison with sizes of complete caps obtained by computer…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCoding theory and cryptography · Finite Group Theory Research · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
