A model of the generic Vop\v{e}nka principle in which the ordinals are not Mahlo
Victoria Gitman, Joel David Hamkins

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the relative consistency of the generic Vopěnka principle with the existence of non-Mahlo ordinals, showing that certain large cardinal assumptions can be avoided in this context.
Contribution
It constructs a model where the generic Vopěnka principle holds without the ordinals being Mahlo, addressing a question about the necessity of Mahlo cardinals.
Findings
The generic Vopěnka principle is consistent with non-Mahlo ordinals.
The generic Vopěnka scheme can be consistent with a definably non-Mahlo class.
No $ ext{Sigma}_2$-reflecting or remarkable cardinals exist in the constructed model.
Abstract
The generic Vop\v{e}nka principle, we prove, is relatively consistent with the ordinals being non-Mahlo. Similarly, the generic Vop\v{e}nka scheme is relatively consistent with the ordinals being definably non-Mahlo. Indeed, the generic Vop\v{e}nka scheme is relatively consistent with the existence of a -definable class containing no regular cardinals. In such a model, there can be no -reflecting cardinals and hence also no remarkable cardinals. This latter fact answers negatively a question of Bagaria, Gitman and Schindler.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
