# Relationship between critical current and flux-flow resistivity in the mixed state of Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$)$_2$As$_2$

## TL;DR

This study investigates the relationship between critical current and flux-flow resistivity in Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$)$_2$As$_2$ superconductors, revealing a universal relation and abnormal flux-flow behavior across different doping levels.

## Contribution

It introduces a simple relationship between critical current density and flux-flow resistivity in unconventional superconductors, highlighting doping-dependent flux-flow behavior.

## Key findings

- All E vs j curves merge at a single point ($j_0,E_0$).
- Flux-flow resistivity $
ho_{ff}$ increases with decreasing magnetic field in these materials.
- Parameter $E_0$ varies with doping and temperature, indicating coexistence of phases.

## Abstract

We studied the temperature and magnetic field dependence of vortex dissipation and critical current in the mixed-state of unconventional superconducting alloys Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$)$_2$As$_2$ ($0.044 \leq x \leq 0.100$) through current-voltage measurements. Our results reveal that all the electric field $E$ vs current density $j$ curves in the Ohmic regime merge to one point ($j_0,E_0$) and that there is a simple relationship between the critical current density $j_c$ and flux-flow resistivity $\rho_{\rm ff}$: $\rho_{\rm ff}/\rho_{\rm n} = (1- j_{c}/j_{0})^{-1}$, where $\rho_{\rm n}=E_0/j_0$ is the normal-state resistivity just above the superconducting transition. In addition, $E_0$ is positive for all five dopings, reflecting the abnormal behavior of the flux-flow resistivity $\rho_{\rm ff}$: it increases with decreasing magnetic field. In contrast, $E_0$ is negative for the conventional superconductor Nb since, as expected, $\rho_{\rm ff}$ decreases with decreasing magnetic field. Furthermore, in the under-doped and over-doped single crystals of Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$)$_2$As$_2$, the parameter $E_0$ remains temperature independent, while it decreases with increasing temperature for the single crystals around optimal doping ($ 0.060\leq x\leq 0.072 $). This result points to the co-existence of superconductivity with some other phase around optimal doping.