
TL;DR
This paper examines evolving banking relationships post-2017, highlighting shifts from traditional security concepts to shared responsibility models to combat fraud and adapt to new financial realities.
Contribution
It introduces a novel legal framework proposing joint liability for banks and criminals to enhance fraud prevention and adapt to changing banking paradigms.
Findings
Changing customer-bank relationships and perceptions.
Legal proposal for joint liability to combat fraud.
Evidence of shifts in banking security concepts.
Abstract
The changing nature of the relationship between a retail bank and its customers is examined, particularly with respect to new financial concepts, debt and regulation. The traditional image of a bank is portrayed as a physical building a classical Doric portico. This image conveys concepts of service, soundness, strength, stability and security ("five-S"). That "five-S" concept is changing, and the evidence for changes that affect customers directly is considered. A fundamental legal problem associated with those changes is highlighted: a bank is no longer solely responsible for the safeguard of customer monies. A solution to this problem is proposed: banks should be jointly liable with perpetrators of criminal activity in the event of frauds as an encouragement to recognise and mitigate fraud.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBanking stability, regulation, efficiency
