# Minimizing the Cost of Team Exploration

**Authors:** Dorota Osula

arXiv: 1705.10826 · 2019-02-20

## TL;DR

This paper investigates cost-efficient strategies for mobile agents exploring graphs, providing optimal algorithms for rings and trees, and analyzing competitive ratios in online settings.

## Contribution

It introduces optimal algorithms for exploring rings and trees, and establishes competitive ratio bounds for online exploration strategies.

## Key findings

- Optimal $O(n)$ algorithms for rings and trees.
- 2-competitive algorithm for rings in online setting.
- Lower bound of 3/2 for online exploration of rings.

## Abstract

A group of mobile agents is given a task to explore an edge-weighted graph $G$, i.e., every vertex of $G$ has to be visited by at least one agent. There is no centralized unit to coordinate their actions, but they can freely communicate with each other. The goal is to construct a deterministic strategy which allows agents to complete their task optimally. In this paper we are interested in a cost-optimal strategy, where the cost is understood as the total distance traversed by agents coupled with the cost of invoking them. Two graph classes are analyzed, rings and trees, in the off-line and on-line setting, i.e., when a structure of a graph is known and not known to agents in advance. We present algorithms that compute the optimal solutions for a given ring and tree of order $n$, in $O(n)$ time units. For rings in the on-line setting, we give the $2$-competitive algorithm and prove the lower bound of $3/2$ for the competitive ratio for any on-line strategy. For every strategy for trees in the on-line setting, we prove the competitive ratio to be no less than $2$, which can be achieved by the $DFS$ algorithm.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.10826/full.md

## Figures

12 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.10826/full.md

## References

16 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.10826/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.10826