# Auditing Search Engines for Differential Satisfaction Across   Demographics

**Authors:** Rishabh Mehrotra, Ashton Anderson, Fernando Diaz, Amit Sharma, Hanna, Wallach, Emine Yilmaz

arXiv: 1705.10689 · 2017-05-31

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a framework for auditing search engines to detect potential demographic disparities in user satisfaction, addressing biases hidden in evaluation metrics using causal inference and multilevel modeling.

## Contribution

It presents novel methods for measuring latent satisfaction differences across demographics, improving fairness assessments of online services.

## Key findings

- Framework reveals hidden satisfaction disparities
- Proposes three methods for measuring latent differences
- Broad applicability to various online services

## Abstract

Many online services, such as search engines, social media platforms, and digital marketplaces, are advertised as being available to any user, regardless of their age, gender, or other demographic factors. However, there are growing concerns that these services may systematically underserve some groups of users. In this paper, we present a framework for internally auditing such services for differences in user satisfaction across demographic groups, using search engines as a case study. We first explain the pitfalls of na\"ively comparing the behavioral metrics that are commonly used to evaluate search engines. We then propose three methods for measuring latent differences in user satisfaction from observed differences in evaluation metrics. To develop these methods, we drew on ideas from the causal inference literature and the multilevel modeling literature. Our framework is broadly applicable to other online services, and provides general insight into interpreting their evaluation metrics.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.10689/full.md

## Figures

18 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.10689/full.md

## References

45 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.10689/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.10689