# Is the Eureka cluster a collisional family of Mars Trojan asteroids?

**Authors:** Apostolos A. Christou, Galin Borisov, Aldo Dell'Oro, Alberto Cellino,, Stefano Bagnulo

arXiv: 1705.10540 · 2017-06-21

## TL;DR

This study investigates whether the Eureka Mars Trojan asteroid family formed through collisional events or other mechanisms, using size distribution, orbital dynamics, and collisional lifetime modeling to evaluate their origins.

## Contribution

The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the formation scenarios of the Eureka asteroid family, combining observational data and modeling to assess collisional and non-collisional origins.

## Key findings

- Collisional lifetime of Eureka-sized objects exceeds a few Gyr.
- Orbital compactness suggests a low-energy or non-collisional formation.
- Size distribution similar to small Main Belt asteroids.

## Abstract

We explore the hypothesis that the Eureka family of sub-km asteroids in the L5 region of Mars could have formed in a collision. We estimate the size distribution index from available information on family members; model the orbital dispersion of collisional fragments; and carry out a formal calculation of the collisional lifetime as a function of size. We find that, as initially conjectured by Rivkin et al (2003), the collisional lifetime of objects the size of (5261) Eureka is at least a few Gyr, significantly longer than for similar-sized Main Belt asteroids. In contrast, the observed degree of orbital compactness is inconsistent with all but the least energetic family-forming collisions. Therefore, the family asteroids may be ejecta from a cratering event sometime in the past ~1 Gyr if the orbits are gradually dispersed by gravitational diffusion and the Yarkovsky effect (Cuk et al, 2015). The comparable sizes of the largest family members require either negligible target strength or a particular impact geometry under this scenario (Durda et al, 2007; Benavidez et al, 2012). Alternatively, the family may have formed by a series of YORP-induced fission events (Pravec.et.al, 2010). The shallow size distribution of the family is similar to that of small MBAs (Gladman et al, 2009) interpreted as due to the dominance of this mechanism for Eureka-family-sized asteroids (Jacobson et al, 2014). However, our population index estimate is likely a lower limit due to the small available number of family asteroids and observational incompleteness. Future searches for fainter family members, further observational characterisation of the known Trojans' physical properties as well as orbital and rotational evolution modelling will help distinguish between different formation models.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.10540/full.md

## Figures

20 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.10540/full.md

## References

66 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.10540/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.10540