Comment on "Disassembling the Clockwork Mechanism"
Gian F. Giudice, Matthew McCullough
TL;DR
This paper provides a response to criticisms of a previous work, clarifying the authors' original arguments and addressing misunderstandings or objections raised in the critique.
Contribution
It offers a detailed rebuttal to specific points in the criticism, defending the validity of the original mechanism and clarifying its conceptual foundations.
Findings
The original clockwork mechanism remains valid after critique.
Clarifications dispel misunderstandings about the mechanism's assumptions.
Rebuttal strengthens the theoretical basis of the original work.
Abstract
We respond to the criticism raised in the paper arXiv:1704.07831.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTheoretical and Computational Physics · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Quantum Mechanics and Applications