Manifestations of the $a^0_0(980)-f_0(980)$ mixing in $D^0\to K^0_S\pi^+\pi^-$ and $D^0\to K^0_S\eta\pi^0$ decays
N.N. Achasov, G.N. Shestakov

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the mixing of the $a^0_0(980)$ and $f_0(980)$ resonances affects decay spectra in $D^0$ meson decays, revealing significant distortions in the $ ho^+ ho^-$ mass spectrum due to isospin-breaking effects.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the $a^0_0(980)$-$f_0(980)$ mixing manifestations in specific $D^0$ decay channels, highlighting the impact on the $ ho^+ ho^-$ spectrum and the dependence on phase differences.
Findings
The $a^0_0(980)$-$f_0(980)$ mixing significantly influences the $ ho^+ ho^-$ mass spectrum.
The $f_0(980)$ peak can be distorted due to mixing effects.
The magnitude of distortions depends on the phase between decay amplitudes.
Abstract
Possible manifestations of the isospin-breaking mixing of the and resonances are analyzed in the and decays. It is shown that the mixing has the most influence on the mass spectrum in the decay . Owing to the mixing, the peak in can experience distortions comparable with its size. The effect essentially depends on the relative phase between the amplitudes of the and transitions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Manifestations of the mixing
in
and decays
N. N. Achasov and G. N. Shestakov
Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, S. L. Sobolev Institute for Mathematics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
Abstract
Possible manifestations of the isospin-breaking mixing of the and resonances are analyzed in the and decays. It is shown that the mixing has the most influence on the mass spectrum in the decay . Owing to the mixing, the peak in can experience distortions comparable with its size. The effect essentially depends on the relative phase between the amplitudes of the and transitions.
Recently, we have examined the interference phenomena in the mass spectrum in the decay AS17 caused by the isospin-breaking mixing ADS79 ; AS16 . Their detection would help clarify the production and decay mechanisms of the light scalars and in weak three-body hadronic decays. A detailed list of references concerning the mixing can be found, for example, in Refs. AS16 ; AKS16 .
In Ref. AS17 , it has been noted that the investigations of the mixing in three-body decays of the meson, such as , , , , and , are also promising and interesting. In the present work, we analyze a possible manifestation of the mixing in the decays and . We show that the mixing has the most impact on the mass spectrum in . Owing to mixing, the peak in can experience distortions comparable with its size. The effect essentially depends on the relative phase between the amplitudes of the and transitions.
The and mass spectra in the and decays caused by the and resonance contributions, respectively, and the mixing have the form
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where is the invariant mass of the or system, and is the relative phase between the amplitudes of the and transitions. The kinematic factors , , and ; GeV. Formulas for the inverse propagators and of the and resonances and the amplitude describing the transition, together with the values of coupling constants , , and , , which we use here, have been written in detail in Refs. AKS16 ; AS17 . The values of GeV*-1/2* and GeV*-1/2* are fixed taking into account the CLEO Collaboration results CLEO02 ; CLEO04 , together with the Particle Data Group information PDG16 , and the relations
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
The current experimental situation with the decays under consideration will be discussed below. Here we only note that the essential numerical input in Eqs. (Manifestations of the mixing in and decays) and (Manifestations of the mixing in and decays) is based now on a very limited experimental statistics using the isobar model of the decay amplitudes, and more precise information would be very desirable. Unfortunately, in more recent analyses of the BaBar08 and Belle Belle14 Collaborations (see also Ref. BaBar10 ), the contribution is not separately treated in the fit to the data on the decay. Nevertheless, the peak is clearly visible in the mass spectrum in this decay BaBar08 ; Belle14 .
The fractions of the and branching ratios caused by the mixing are given by, respectively,
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
and as functions of the relative phase between the amplitudes of the and decays are shown in Fig. 1 by the solid and dashed curves, respectively. The solid and dashed horizontal lines in Fig. 1 show the incoherent contributions to and from the mixing [i.e., the modules squared of the second terms in the sums in Eqs. (1) and (2)] that are equal to and , respectively.
As is seen from Fig. 1, the maximal constructive (destructive) interference between the contribution of the resonance and that of the mixing in the channel corresponds to the phase (), while the maximal constructive (destructive) interference between the contributions from the and the mixing in the channel corresponds to the phase (). Figure 2 shows the mass spectra and for these ultimate interference patterns.
The fact that is about 5 times greater than [see Eqs. (Manifestations of the mixing in and decays) and (Manifestations of the mixing in and decays)] leads to an increase in the influence of the mixing on the mass spectrum in comparison with its influence in the channel. Owing to interference, the integral effect from the mixing contribution can reach about (see Fig. 1). This is very large for the isotopic symmetry-breaking effect. As is seen from Fig. 2, the mixing can result in the essential distortions of the line shape in the channel. For example, it can lead to a narrowing of the peak by about 1.5 times and to an increase of its height up to 60% or even to the formation of two peaks. The effect essentially depends on the relative phase between the and decay amplitudes. Certainly, a good mass resolution and high statistics are required to detect phenomena of such a kind.
Let us briefly discuss the experimental situation PDG16 ; CLEO04 ; BaBar05 ; CLEO02 ; BaBar08 ; Belle14 ; BaBar10 . There is only one experiment on the decay performed by the CLEO Collaboration CLEO04 . The Dalitz analysis of 155 selected candidates showed that the decay proceeds mainly via and intermediate states, the first of which is dominant CLEO04 . Note that the production has been observed not only in the decay [for which CLEO04 ; PDG16 ] but also in the channel BaBar05 ; BaBar10 . According to Ref. BaBar05 , , while from Supplemental Material to Ref. BaBar10 (see Ref. [18] in BaBar10 ) it follows that the central value for . The relation of the above branching ratios is typical for the resonance in the model ADS81 ; AI89 ; A98 , in which the is strongly coupled with the and channels.
In the CLEO CLEO02 , BaBar08 , and Belle Belle14 experiments 5299, 487 000, and 1 231 731 candidates were selected, respectively. The Dalitz distributions have a rich structure. Among the possible intermediate states are such as , , , , , and . According to the CLEO analysis CLEO02 , the fraction constitutes of . The production together with the system in the wave, , constitutes about 12% of the total branching ratio of the decay into BaBar08 ; Belle14 . The mass spectrum in the 1 GeV region was scanned in the BaBar08 and Belle Belle14 experiments with an 5-MeV-wide step. It is interesting to note that the whole visible peak contains only 6–7 points; i.e., its width is less than 25 MeV. Such a narrowness of the peak can be related to the effect of the mixing. Of course, it is impossible to completely eliminate the effect of interference of the contribution with the background from other intermediate states. There is hope that further investigations will clarify this issue. The most clear information about the decay channel, as well as about the possible role of background contributions, is given by the distribution of events on the ()-Dalitz plot.
The present work is partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research Grant No. 16-02-00065 and the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences Project No. 0314-2015-0011.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1(1) N. N. Achasov and G. N. Shestakov, ar Xiv:1704.01763 (to be published in Phys. Rev. D).
- 2(2) N. N. Achasov, S. A. Devyanin, and G. N. Shestakov, Phys. Lett. B 88 , 367 (1979).
- 3(3) N. N. Achasov and G. N. Shestakov, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 287-288 , 89 (2017).
- 4(4) N. N. Achasov, A. A. Kozhevnikov, and G. N. Shestakov, Phys. Rev. D 93 , 114027 (2016).
- 5(5) H. Muramatsu et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 , 251802 (2002).
- 6(6) P. Rubin et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 , 111801 (2004).
- 7(7) C. Patrignani et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C 40 , 100001 (2016).
- 8(8) B. Aubert et al. ( B A B A R 𝐵 𝐴 𝐵 𝐴 𝑅 BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 78 , 034023 (2008).
