Completely Sidon sets in $C^*$-algebras (New title)
Gilles Pisier

TL;DR
This paper introduces the concept of completely Sidon sets in $C^*$-algebras, generalizing classical Sidon set stability under unions to a non-commutative operator space context, with applications to free group $C^*$-algebras.
Contribution
It extends Drury's theorem to completely Sidon sets in $C^*$-algebras, including non-commutative generalizations related to free groups and von Neumann algebras.
Findings
Complete Sidon sets are stable under finite unions in $C^*$-algebras.
The non-commutative version of Drury's theorem is established.
Extensions to von Neumann algebras with tracial states are provided.
Abstract
A sequence in a -algebra is called completely Sidon if its span in is completely isomorphic to the operator space version of the space (i.e. equipped with its maximal operator space structure). The latter can also be described as the span of the free unitary generators in the (full) -algebra of the free group with countably infinitely many generators. Our main result is a generalization to this context of Drury's classical theorem stating that Sidon sets are stable under finite unions. In the particular case when the (maximal) -algebra of a discrete group , we recover the non-commutative (operator space) version of Drury's theorem that we recently proved. We also give several non-commutative generalizations of our recent work on uniformly bounded orthonormal systems to the case of von Neumann algebras equipped with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Operator Algebra Research · Advanced Banach Space Theory · Holomorphic and Operator Theory
Completely Sidon sets in -algebras
by
Gilles Pisier
Texas A&M University and UPMC-Paris VI
Abstract
A sequence in a -algebra is called completely Sidon if its span in is completely isomorphic to the operator space version of the space (i.e. equipped with its maximal operator space structure). The latter can also be described as the span of the free unitary generators in the (full) -algebra of the free group with countably infinitely many generators. Our main result is a generalization to this context of Drury’s classical theorem stating that Sidon sets are stable under finite unions. In the particular case when the (maximal) -algebra of a discrete group , we recover the non-commutative (operator space) version of Drury’s theorem that we recently proved. We also give several non-commutative generalizations of our recent work on uniformly bounded orthonormal systems to the case of von Neumann algebras equipped with normal faithful tracial states.
MSC Classif. 43A46, 46L06
Recently, following the impulse of Bourgain and Lewko [1], we studied in [17] the uniformly bounded orthonormal systems that span in a subspace isomorphic to by the basis to basis equivalence, and we called them Sidon sequences in analogy with the case of characters on compact abelian groups. One of the main results in [17] says that if a uniformly bounded orthonormal system in of a probability space is the union of two Sidon sequences, then the sequence or simply is Sidon in . Our goal in this paper is to generalize this result to sequences in a non-commutative -algebra. The central ingredient of our method in [17] is the spectral decomposition of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck semigroup for a Gaussian measure on . Since this has all sorts of non-commutative analogues, it is natural to try to extend the results of [17] to non-commutative von Neumann or -algebras in place of . In [17] “subgaussian” and “randomly Sidon” sequences play an important role. Although the non-commutative analogue of a subgaussian system is not clear (see however Remark 4.10), and that of “randomly Sidon set” eludes us for the moment, we are able in the present paper to extend several of the main results of [17], in particular we recover an analogue of Drury’s famous union theorem for Sidon sets in groups. In the commutative case the fundamental example of Sidon set is the set formed of the canonical generators in the group formed of all the finitely supported functions . This is sometimes referred to as the free Abelian group with countably infinitely many generators. The dual of the discrete group is the compact group , and the von Neumann algebra of can be identified with . The analogue of this for our work is the free group with countably infinitely many generators, and its von Neumann algebra . In the commutative case the generators of correspond in to independent random variables uniformly distributed over . In classical Sidon set theory, the associated Riesz product plays a crucial role, because of its special interpolation property derived from its spectral decomposition. In more modern approaches, these variables are replaced by standard i.i.d. gaussian random variables, and in [17] the “spectral/interpolation property” of Riesz products is replaced by the spectral expansion of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck semigroup , i.e. the one that multiplies a multivariate Hermite function of degree by (here ). Equivalently this is obtained by second quantization applied to on the symmetric Fock space. In our new setting, the proper analogue comes from Voiculescu’s free probability theory (cf. [21]), where the analogues of gaussian variables are operators on the full Fock space. Not surprisingly, the techniques we use come from non-commutative probability, in connection with operator space theory for which we refer to [16].
By definition an operator space is a subspace of a -algebra, and the operator space structure (o.s.s. in short) on consists of the sequence of norms induced on by , where denotes the space of -matrices with entries in , and is equipped with its natural norm as a -algebra.
Let denote the canonical basis of the Banach space of absolutely summable complex sequences. The space is equipped with a special o.s.s. called the maximal one. The latter operator space structure is induced by the isometric embedding taking to the -th free unitary generator in the maximal -algebra (see [16, p. 183]). See [16, §3] for more information and references.
We recall that the algebraic tensor product of two -algebras can be equipped with a minimal and a maximal -norm, which after completion produce the -algebras and . If either or is commutative (or nuclear) then isometrically.
It is well known that the linear maps between -algebras that are compatible with the minimal tensor products are the completely bounded (c.b. in short) ones, see [8, 13, 16]. We should emphasize that the analogous maps for the maximal tensor products are the decomposable ones (see (1.4) and (1.5) below) for which we extensively use Haagerup’s results in [11]. See [16, §11] or [7] for more background.
The natural non-commutative generalizations of the notions in [19] are like this:
Definition 0.1**.**
A bounded sequence in a -algebra is called completely Sidon if the mapping taking to is a complete isomorphism when is equipped with its maximal o.s.s..
The sequence is called completely -Sidon in if the sequence (-times) is completely Sidon when viewed as sitting in (-times).
When is commutative, we simply say that is -Sidon (and when we just call it Sidon), thus recovering the terminology in [17].
Let be a non-commutative tracial probability space, i.e. a von Neumann algebra equipped with a faithful normal tracial state. Toward the end of this paper we reach our (already announced) goal: we show that if is an orthonormal system that is uniformly bounded in and is the union of two completely Sidon sequences then is completely -Sidon.
One difficulty is the apparent lack of a suitable non-commutative analogue of the notion of subgaussian sequence, that is crucially used in [17], as well as that of a sequence “dominated” by gaussians. We say that sequence in an -space is dominated by another one if there is a bounded linear map taking to for all . In the non-commutative case, we use the same definition but c.b. maps are not enough, we must consider decomposable maps between non-commutative -space, i.e. preduals of von Neumann algebras . By decomposable we just mean that the adjoint is decomposable as a linear combination of c.p. maps. When are commutative any bounded linear map between them is decomposable, but in general it is not so.
A key point in the commutative setting of [17] is that if a uniformly bounded orthonormal sequence in is Sidon with constant , then there is a biorthogonal sequence in that is dominated by an i.i.d. bounded sequence (and a fortiori dominated by i.i.d. gaussians). The proof is very simple: the mapping taking to the -coordinate on has norm , it extends to a mapping with the same norm, then if we set viewed as an element of , defined by does the job.
A second point in [17] is that if a sequence in is dominated by a sequence such as then any bounded sequence in that is biorthogonal to it must be -Sidon.
In the non-commutative setting, is replaced by and by equipped with its usual trace . The non-commutative version of is the sequence formed of variables each one having the same distribution as or (i.e. normalized Haar measure on ) but instead of stochastic independence we require freeness. More formally we take for the element of associated to the -th free generator of . Equivalently can be any free Haar unitary sequence in the sense of [21]. We could use just as well any free semicircular (also called “free gaussian”) sequence in Voiculescu’s sense. More generally we call “pseudo-free” (see Remark 3.3) any sequence that is equivalent in a suitable sense (see Definition 1.5) to such a sequence . Surprisingly, in this setting there is no need to distinguish between the gaussian and i.i.d. unimodular case, because free gaussian variables, unlike the gaussian ones, are uniformy bounded.
The non-commutative analogue of the preceding two points can be described schematically like this:
Theorem 0.2**.**
Assume completely Sidon in . Then admits a biorthogonal sequence in that is dominated by . Moreover, any bounded sequence in that is biorthogonal to a sequence dominated by is completely -Sidon in .
See §3 for the proof. This is particularly useful in the case ( a discrete group) when , the ’s being distinct elements of , and being the universal unitary representation of . We say that the set is completely Sidon in when is so in . In this case completely -Sidon in automatically implies completely Sidon, therefore “completely Sidon” is equivalent to having a biothogonal sequence dominated by .
We deduce from this in Corollary 4.9 that the union of two completely Sidon subsets of is completely Sidon. This reduces to show that the union of the two completely Sidon sets is such that, in the group , has a biothogonal sequence dominated by . Indeed, the preceding Theorem then tells us that is completely Sidon in and this clearly is the same as saying is completely Sidon. Note that while the property “dominated by ” is preserved by the union of two sequences with it (see Remark 4.6), when dealing with a disjoint union we have to find a way around the following difficulty : the union of a system biorthogonal to with one biorthogonal to is not necessarily biorthogonal to . This explains why we pass to . A similar difficulty arises for a general . This point leads us to conclude that the union is completely -Sidon only for when we would hope to find (see the proof of Theorem 4.7).
The proof of Theorem 0.2 reduces to a special case that we prove in Corollary 2.6, namely the case when and . This is analogous to the commutative result proved in [17]: any subgaussian sequence in (in particular the above sequence in ) is such that any bounded biorthogonal sequence in is -Sidon. See Remark 4.10 for a further discussion of possible generalization of the “subgaussian” property.
There is an extensive literature on Sidon sets in commutative discrete groups or in duals (dual objects) of compact groups, see e.g. [9], but not much seems to be available on Sidon sets in non-abelian discrete groups or a fortiori in -algebras. Bożejko and Picardello investigated several closely connected notions of Sidon set, those that span isomorphically but only as a Banach space and not an operator space, see [2, 3, 14]. Apparently no version of Drury’s theorem is known for these notions in non-abelian groups. We refer to Bożejko and Speicher’s [6] and also the recent work [5] for some results on completely positive functions on Coxeter groups that may be related to our own. See also [4].
See also [22] for a study of Sidon sets in compact quantum groups.
We refer to [16] for background on completely bounded (c.b. in short), completely positive (c.p. in short), and decomposable maps. See also [11]. Some of the connections of the latter notions with the harmonic analysis of the present paper are described in chapter 8 and §9.6 and §9.7 in [16].
1 Completely Sidon sets
Let be the unitary generators in .
Let be a -algebra. Let be a bounded sequence in .
Definition 1.1**.**
We say that is completely Sidon if there is such that for any matricial coefficients
[TABLE]
Equivalently, the operator space spanned by in is completely isomorphic to equipped with the maximal operator space structure.
Fix an integer . We say that is completely -Sidon in if the sequence (-times) is completely Sidon in (-times).
Remark 1.2*.*
It is important to note that for the notion of completely -Sidon is relative to the ambient -algebra . If is a -subalgebra of a -algebra , and is completely -Sidon in , it does not follow in general that is completely -Sidon in . This does hold nevertheless if there is a c.p. or decomposable projection from to . It obviously holds without restriction if , but for the precision -Sidon “in ” is important. However, when there is no risk of confusion we will omit “in ”.
Proposition 1.3**.**
The following are equivalent:
(i) The sequence is completely Sidon.
(ii) There is such that for any , any in , and any in we have
[TABLE]
(ii)’ Same as (ii) but for in the unit ball of .
(ii)” There is such that for any -algebras and , any in , and any in the unit ball of we have
[TABLE]
(iii) Same as (ii) but with even, say and the ’s restricted to be such that for .
(iv) Same as (ii) but with the ’s restricted to be selfadjoint unitaries.
Sketch.
The equivalence (i) (ii) is just an explicit reformulation of the preceding definition. To justify (iii) (ii) we can use . Then after integrating in , we can separate the two parts of the sum appearing in (ii). This gives us for the sup over all the ’s as in (iii)
[TABLE]
and hence (triangle inequality)
[TABLE]
where the last sup runs over all as in (ii). We then deduce (ii) from (iii) possibly with a different constant.
To justify (iv) (ii) we can use a -matrix trick: if is an arbitrary sequence in , are selfadjoint in . We then deduce (ii) from (iv) with the same constant.
Lastly the equivalence (ii) (ii)’ is obvious by an extreme point argument, and (ii)’ (ii)” (which reduces to and hence to the matricial case) follows by Russo-Dye and standard operator space arguments (see [16, p. 155-156] for more background). ∎
Remark 1.4*.*
For simplicity we state our results for sequences indexed by , but actually they hold with obvious adaptation of the proofs for families indexed by an arbitrary set, finite or not, with bounds independent of the number of elements.
Examples :
(i) The fundamental example of a completely Sidon set (with ) is of course any free subset in a group. More precisely, if we add the unit to a free set, the resulting augmented set is still completely Sidon with . Moreover, any left or right translate of a completely Sidon set is completely Sidon (with the same ). Therefore any left translate of a free set augmented by the unit is completely Sidon with . The converse also holds and is easy to prove, see [19].
(ii) It is proved in [16, Th. 8.2 p.150] that for any the diagonal mapping defines an isometric embedding of into . It follows that a subset is completely Sidon iff the set is completely -Sidon in . Let be the von Neumann algebra of (i.e. the one generated by ). Similar arguments show that the same diagonal embedding embeds also into . In particular the set of free generators is a completely -Sidon set in (and also in ).
We will be interested in another property, namely the following one:
Let be preduals of -algebras (so-called non-commutative -spaces).
We say that a bounded linear map is completely positive (in short c.p.) if is c.p..
Let be -algebras. Let be the set of c.p. maps from to . We say that a bounded linear map is decomposable if there are such that
[TABLE]
We use the dec-norm as defined by Haagerup [11]. We denote
[TABLE]
where the infimum runs over all maps such that the map
[TABLE]
is in .
A mapping is said to be decomposable if its adjoint is decomposable in the preceding sense (linear combination of c.p. maps), and we set by convention
[TABLE]
We use the term -decomposable for maps that are decomposable with dec-norm .
The crucial property of a decomposable map between -algebras is that for any other -algebra the mapping extends to a bounded (actually decomposable) map from to . Moreover we have
[TABLE]
Consequently, for any pair () of decomposable maps between -algebras, we have
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Definition 1.5**.**
Let be any sets. (i) Let (resp. ) be a family in (resp. ). Let us say that is -dominated (or “decomposably -dominated”) by if there is a decomposable mapping with such that for any .
We simply say “dominated” for -dominated for some .
(ii) We say that and are “ decomposably equivalent ” if there is a bijection such that each of the families and is dominated by the other.
Let be the predual of a -algebra. The positive cone in is the polar of the positive cone in the -algebra . More precisely iff
[TABLE]
Clearly is c.p. iff for any the mapping is positivity preserving.
More generally, since we have positive cones on both and , we can extend the definition of complete positivity to maps from a -algebra to or from to a -algebra. In particular, a map is called c.p. if is positivity preserving for any .
Remark 1.6*.*
[Opposite von Neumann algebra] The opposite von Neumann is the same linear space as but with the reverse product. Let be the identity map, viewed as acting from to , so that also acts as the identity.
When is a von Neumann algebra equipped with a normal faithful tracial state , there is a minor problem that needs clarification. We have a natural inclusion denoted by and defined by . In general this is not c.p, but it is c.p. when viewed as a mapping either from or from . Indeed, for all we have but in general it is not true that for .
Then the content of the preceding observation is that is c.p. (but in general fails this).
Remark 1.7*.*
[About preduals of finite vN algebras] Let be here any noncommutative probability space, i.e. a von Neumann algebra equipped with a normal faithful tracial state. The predual is the subset of formed of the weak* continuous functionals on . It can be isometrically identified with the space defined as the completion of for the norm . Thus we have a natural inclusion with dense range . We need to observe the following fact. Let be another noncommutative probability space. Let be a linear map that is a -homomorphism from to when restricted to . Then is completely positive and hence 1-decomposable.
2 Analysis of the free group case
We denote by the von Neumann algebra of the free group equipped with its usual trace .
We denote by the elements of corresponding to the free generators in , i.e. .
For convenience we set
[TABLE]
Although this is a bit pedantic, it is wise to distinguish the elements of from the linear functionals on that they determine. Thus we let be the sequence in that is biorthogonal to the sequence , and defined for all by
[TABLE]
We also define as follows
[TABLE]
Again let be the inclusion mapping defined by . With this notation
[TABLE]
For future reference, we record here a simple observation:
Lemma 2.1**.**
Recall . The families and are decomposably equivalent in the sense of Definition 1.5.
Proof.
Let be a sequence such that each and are mutually free, each one being a free Haar unitary sequence. Then and are trivially decomposably equivalent. Let be a copy of the von Neumann algebra of . Let . Let denote the generator of viewed as a subalgebra of . We also view . Then the family viewed as sitting in is a family of free Haar unitaries. Therefore and are decomposably equivalent. But and are also decomposably equivalent in , because the multiplication by or is decomposable (roughly because, since is c.p., is decomposable by the polarization formula). Lastly using conditional expectations it is easy to see that the families and (identical families viewed as sitting in or ) are decomposably equivalent. ∎
Let be the algebra generated by . Note for further reference that the orthogonal projection onto the closed span in of is defined by
[TABLE]
We use ingredients analogous to those of [17] but in [17] the free group is replaced by the free Abelian group, and an ordinary gaussian sequence is used (we could probably use analogously a free semicircular sequence here).
Let be the unitaries coming from the free generators. We set again by convention ().
Let . Consider the natural linear map such that
[TABLE]
Its key property is that for some Hilbert space there is a factorization of the form
[TABLE]
such that
[TABLE]
where , and is a decomposable map with . To check this note that embeds in a trace preserving way into an ultraproduct of matrix algebras, and there is a c.p. conditional expectation from onto . Therefore there is a completely positive surjection from to and a -homomorphism such that . To complete the argument we need to replace by . Since embeds in for some and there is a conditional expectation from to , this is immediate. We refer the reader to [16, §9.10] for more details.
The following statement on the free group factor is the key for our results.
Theorem 2.2**.**
*The sequence in satisfies the following property:
any bounded sequence in that is biorthogonal to in meaning that*
[TABLE]
is completely -Sidon. More generally, if and are bounded in and each biorthogonal to , then is completely Sidon in .
Let and be as in Theorem 2.2. Assume for all ().
Fix integers . Let be a family in with only finitely many ’s for which . Let be unitaries in such that for all . Our goal is to show that there is a constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
This will prove the key Theorem 2.2 with instead of . Then a simple elementary argument will allow us to replace by .
Remark 2.3*.*
Let be a c.p. map such that . We associate to it a state on by setting
[TABLE]
A matrix is defined as if for all .
More generally, any decomposable operator on (in particular any finite rank one) determines an element of , defined by for by
[TABLE]
Indeed, the bilinear form is of unit norm in and
[TABLE]
Furthermore, for any pair of -algebras , we have a 1-1-correspondence between the set of decomposable maps and .
Remark 2.4*.*
We will need the free analogue of Riesz products.
Recall we set . Let . Let the orthogonal projection on onto the span of the words of length in . Let . By Haagerup’s well known result [10], is a c.p. map on . Composing it with the inclusion , we find a unital c.p. map from to , and hence determines a state on .
We view as acting from to . We can also consider it as a map taking to itself.
We will crucially use the decomposition We set
[TABLE]
so that
[TABLE]
We have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Lemma 2.5**.**
With the preceding notation, we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
This follows from (1.5). ∎
Proof of Theorem 2.2.
Fix (to be determined later). We have decompositions
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where and are orthogonal to and moreover
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
We have
[TABLE]
The idea will be to reduce this product to the simplest term .
Let be the isometric -homomorphism taking to . Note that is decomposable with . We observe
[TABLE]
Let be the bilinear form defined by . It is a classical fact that is a state on . We claim
[TABLE]
Indeed, let for simplicity. We may develop in
[TABLE]
Let be the unitary representation on taking to . For simplicity we denote for any . With this notation Then
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and hence (triangle inequality and Cauchy-Schwarz)
[TABLE]
This proves our claim. Let
[TABLE]
Recalling the orthogonality relations and we see that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
We now go back to (2.6): we have
[TABLE]
Therefore (the norm is the norm in )
[TABLE]
and hence by (2.6)
[TABLE]
By the triangle inequality
[TABLE]
Recalling (2.7) and (2.8) we find
[TABLE]
Taking the sup over all ’s and using (1.1) (recall is the convex hull of ) we find
[TABLE]
This completes the proof for , since if we choose, say, with we obtain the announced result with .
It remains to justify the replacement of by . For this it suffices to exhibit a (normal) -linear -isomorphism such that for all . Indeed, let us view with . Then since for all (these are matrices with real entries), the matrix transposition is the required -isomorphism . ∎
Corollary 2.6**.**
Let and be bounded in and each biorthogonal to , then is completely Sidon in .
Proof.
By Lemma 2.1 we know that is dominated by . Let decomposable taking to (modulo a suitable bijection ). Then () is biorthogonal to . By Theorem 2.2, is completely Sidon in . By (1.5) is completely Sidon in . Equivalently since this is obviously invariant under permutation, we conclude is completely Sidon in .
∎
3 Main results. Free unitary domination
We start with a simple but crucial observation that links completely Sidon sets with the free analogues of Rademacher functions or independent gaussian random variables.
Proposition 3.1**.**
Let be a completely Sidon set in with constant . Then there is a biorthogonal system in that is -dominated by .
Proof.
Let be the linear span of . Let be the linear map such that . By our assumption . We have . By the injectivity of , admits an extension with . Note (see [11]) that . Let . Then is a -decomposable map. Its adjoint is also -decomposable. Let be the functionals biorthogonal to the sequence defined above in . We have . Therefore since
[TABLE]
Thus setting we find This shows that , which is by definition -dominated by , is biorthogonal to . ∎
Theorem 3.2**.**
*Let , be -algebras. Let , be bounded sequences in , bounded by and respectively. Let be a sequence in biorthogonal to , and let be a sequence in biorthogonal to . If both are dominated by , then is completely Sidon in .
More precisely, if is -dominated by , is completely Sidon in with a constant depending only on .*
Proof.
The key ingredient is Corollary 2.6. Assume dominated by . Let be decomposable such that (), with biorthogonal to and . Moreover let be the restriction of to . Note that , or equivalently , is obviously biorthogonal to for each . Let . By Corollary 2.6 the sequence is completely Sidon in . But since we see by (1.5) that this implies that is completely Sidon in . The assertion on the constants is easy to check by going over the argument. ∎
Remark 3.3* (On “pseudo-free” sequences).*
Let us say that a sequence in the predual of a von Neumann algebra is pseudo-free if and are decomposably equivalent. Clearly, we may replace by any other pseudo-free sequence in what precedes. Note that any sequence of free Haar unitaries, (or free Rademacher) or of free semicircular variables is pseudo-free. More generally, any free sequence with mean 0 in a non-commutative tracial probability space such that and is pseudo-free.
Indeed, this can be deduced from the fact that trace preserving unital c.p. maps extend to trace preserving c.p. maps on reduced free products. The latter fact reduces the problem to the commutative case (one first checks the result for a single variable with unital c.p. maps instead of decomposable ones).
4 The union problem
It is high time to formalize a bit more the central notion of this paper.
Definition 4.1**.**
Let be a sequence in the predual of a von Neumann algebra. Let be as before in . We will say that is free-gaussian dominated in (or dominated by free-gaussians in ) if it is (decomposably) dominated by the sequence in , or equivalently (see Remark 3.3) if it is (decomposably) dominated by a free-gaussian sequence (or any pseudo-free sequence) in . Here “(decomposably) dominated” is meant in the sense of Definition 1.5.
For convenience we define the associated constant using the (unitary) sequence : we say that is free-gaussian -dominated in if it is -dominated by , so that we have with such that .
Remark 4.2*.*
By classical results (see [20, p. 126]) for any von Neumann algebra , there is a c.p. projection (with dec-norm equal to 1) from to . Therefore the notions of domination in or in are equivalent for sequences sitting in .
Of course we frame the preceding definition to emphasize the analogy with the sequences dominated by i.i.d gaussians in [17]. Note that in the latter, with independence in place of freeness, dominated by gaussians does not imply dominated by i.i.d. Haar unitaries, (indeed gaussians themselves fail this) but it holds in the free case because free-gaussians are bounded. Note in passing that bounded linear maps between -spaces of commutative (and hence injective) von Neumann algebras are automatically decomposable.
Lemma 4.3**.**
Let be von Neumann algebras. Assume that is equipped with a normal faithful tracial state . For we denote by the associated linear form on defined by . Let be unitaries in , so that . Let be free-gaussian -dominated. Then the sequence is also -dominated by .
Proof.
Let be as in Definition 4.1 (here ). Since and have the same -distribution, the linear mapping taking to extends to a c.p. (isometric, unital and trace preserving) map from to (see Remark 1.7). Then the composition takes to . Since is c.p. and , with dec-norm , is -decomposable. ∎
Remark 4.4*.*
By the Russo-Dye theorem the unit ball of is the closed convex hull of its unitaries. Actually, for any fixed there is an integer such that any with norm can be written as an average of unitaries, this is due to Kadison and Pedersen, see [12] for a proof with and . Using this, we can extend Lemma 4.3 to sequences in the unit ball of . Indeed, the set of sequences in such that the sequence in is -dominated by is obviously a convex set. By Lemma 4.3 it contains the set of sequences of unitaries in . By the Kadison-Pedersen result it contains any family with . Therefore if for all the sequence is -dominated by for any .
Lemma 4.5**.**
Let be a completely Sidon set in with constant . There is a biorthogonal system in such that, for any as before and any with , the sequence is free-gaussian -dominated.
Proof.
This follows from Proposition 3.1 and Lemma 4.3 with the variant described in Remark 4.4, applied to . ∎
Remark 4.6*.*
At this point it is useful to observe the following: consider two sequences in (a von Neumann algebra predual) each of which is free-gaussian -dominated, we claim that their union is free-gaussian -dominated. Indeed, if we have , , with , (). Let be the free product, and let () be the conditional expectation onto each copy of in . We can form the operator defined by . Clearly is decomposable with . Let and denote the sequences corresponding to in each copy of in . We have for all and all . But since the sequence is clearly equivalent to our original sequence , this proves the claim.
We now come to a non-commutative generalization of our result from [17].
Theorem 4.7**.**
Let be von Neumann algebras, with as before. Suppose and are two completely Sidon sets in a -subalgebra . Assume there is a representation such that for some we have
[TABLE]
We assume that and are mutually orthogonal in . Then the union is completely -Sidon.
Proof.
We first observe that since extends to a (normal) representation from to , we may assume without loss of generality that and that is extended to . Note that by our assumption is bounded in . By a simple homogeneity argument, we may assume without loss of generality that
[TABLE]
By Lemma 4.5 there are biorthogonal to such that is free-gaussian dominated in . Note that the latter is also biorthogonal to . Similarly there are such that the same holds for . By Remark 4.6, the union is free-gaussian dominated. But now the latter system is biorthogonal to . Indeed, this holds because, by our orthogonality assumption, for all . By Theorem 3.2 we conclude that the latter system, which can be described as , is completely -Sidon. Using (1.5) to remove
[TABLE]
we see that this implies that itself is completely -Sidon. ∎
Remark 4.8*.*
As the reader may have noticed the preceding proof actually shows that is completely Sidon in .
Let be any discrete group. We say that subset is completely Sidon if the set is completely Sidon in . In this setting we recover our recent generalization [19] of Drury’s classical commutative result.
Corollary 4.9**.**
Let be any discrete group. The union of two completely Sidon subsets of is completely Sidon.
Proof.
We claim that any completely -Sidon set in is completely Sidon. With this claim, the Corollary follows from Theorem 4.7 applied with . To check this claim, we use (ii) in Proposition 1.3. Let be the universal representation on . Assuming . Let . For any unitary representation on with values in a unital algebra , with the same notation as in (ii), we have obviously (since extends completely contractively to )
[TABLE]
Applying this with , and , the claim becomes immediate. ∎
We refer to [19] for several complementary results, in particular for “completely Sidon” versions of the interpolation and Fatou-Zygmund properties of Sidon sets, and for a discussion of the closed span of a completely Sidon set in the reduced -algebra of .
Remark 4.10*.*
By analogy with the commutative case, we propose the following definition: Let be a free-gaussian (i.e. free semicircular) sequence in . We say that in is free-subgaussian if there is such that for any the union of the sequences in is -dominated by . Here is the (full) free product of copies of , and are the copies of in each of the free factors of . Note that with the same notation the sequence in has the same distribution as the original sequence .
In the commutative case, when lies in over some probability space and freeness is replaced by independence, this is the same as subgaussian in the usual sense, see [17, Prop. 2.10] for details. See [18] for a survey on subgaussian systems.
Acknowledgement. Thanks are due to Marek Bożejko, Simeng Wang and Mateusz Wasilewski for useful communications.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] J. Bourgain and M. Lewko, Sidonicity and variants of Kaczmarz’s problem, Annales Inst. Fourier.
- 2[2] M. Bożejko, A new group algebra and lacunary sets in discrete noncommutative groups. Studia Math. 70 (1981), 165–175.
- 3[3] M. Bożejko, On Λ ( p ) Λ 𝑝 \Lambda(p) -sets with minimal constant in discrete noncommutative groups. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 51 (1975), 407–412.
- 4[4] M. Bożejko, Positive and negative definite kernels on groups, Heidelberg Lectures Notes (1987)
- 5[5] M. Bożejko, Ś. Gal and W. Młotkowski, Positive definite functions on Coxeter groups with applications to operator spaces and noncommutative probability. Arxiv, 2017.
- 6[6] M. Bożejko and R. Speicher, Completely positive maps on Coxeter groups, deformed commutation relations, and operator spaces. Math. Ann. 300 (1994), 97–120.
- 7[7] N.P. Brown and N. Ozawa, C ∗ superscript C \mathrm{C}^{*} -algebras and finite-dimensional approximations , Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 88, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008.
- 8[8] E. Effros and Z.J. Ruan, Operator Spaces . Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2000.
