# Epidemic spreading in multiplex networks influenced by opinion exchanges on vaccination

## TL;DR

This paper models the interplay between opinion dynamics about vaccination and disease spread in a multiplex network, revealing how societal opinion trends influence epidemic thresholds and vaccination effectiveness.

## Contribution

It introduces a coupled opinion-disease model on multiplex networks, incorporating persuasion, compromise, and vaccine efficacy, to analyze their combined impact on epidemic spreading.

## Key findings

- Opinion trends significantly affect epidemic thresholds.
- Extremist opinions can hinder vaccination efforts.
- Vaccination effectiveness depends on societal opinion dynamics.

## Abstract

We study the changes of opinions about vaccination together with the evolution of a disease. In our model we consider a multiplex network consisting of two layers. One of the layers corresponds to a social network where people share their opinions and influence others opinions. The social model that rules the dynamic is the M-model, which takes into account two different processes that occurs in a society: persuasion and compromise. This two processes are related through a parameter $r$, $r<1$ describes a moderate and committed society, for $r>1$ the society tends to have extremist opinions, while $r=1$ represents a neutral society. This social network may be of real or virtual contacts. On the other hand, the second layer corresponds to a network of physical contacts where the disease spreading is described by the SIR-Model. In this model the individuals may be in one of the following four states: Susceptible ($S$), Infected($I$), Recovered ($R$) or Vaccinated ($V$). A Susceptible individual can: i) get vaccinated, if his opinion in the other layer is totally in favor of the vaccine, ii) get infected, with probability $\beta$ if he is in contact with an infected neighbor. Those $I$ individuals recover after a certain period $t_r=6$. Vaccinated individuals have an extremist positive opinion that does not change. We consider that the vaccine has a certain effectiveness $\omega$ and as a consequence vaccinated nodes can be infected with probability $\beta (1 - \omega)$ if they are in contact with an infected neighbor. In this case, if the infection process is successful, the new infected individual changes his opinion from extremist positive to totally against the vaccine. We find that depending on the trend in the opinion of the society, which depends on $r$, different behaviors in the spread of the epidemic occurs. An epidemic threshold was found.