On the density of states of graphene in the nearest-neighbor approximation
V.O. Ananyev, M.I. Ovchynnikov

TL;DR
This paper presents a new, unified analytical formula for the density of states in clean graphene using the nearest-neighbor approximation, simplifying previous expressions and covering the entire energy spectrum.
Contribution
It introduces a single, comprehensive formula for graphene's density of states that improves upon previous fragmented expressions.
Findings
The new formula is valid across the entire energy range.
It matches previous expressions in their respective limits.
The paper clarifies the relationship between the new and old formulas.
Abstract
We propose an alternative analytical expression for the density of states of a clean graphene in the nearest-neighbor approximation. In contrast to the previously known expression, it can be written as a single formula valid for the whole energy range. The correspondence with the previously known expression is shown and the limiting cases are analyzed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
On the density of states of graphene in the nearest-neighbor approximation
V.O. Ananyev, M.I. Ovchynnikov
(Received June 8, 2017, in final form July 21, 2017)
Abstract
We propose an alternative analytical expression for the density of states of a clean graphene in the nearest-neighbor approximation. In contrast to the previously known expression, it can be written as a single formula valid for the whole energy range. The correspondence with the previously known expression is shown and the limiting cases are analyzed.
Key words: graphene, density of states, Van Hove singularity
PACS: 71.20.Tx, 73.22.Pr
Abstract
Ми пропонуємо альтернативний аналiтичний вираз для густини електронних станiв у чистому графенi в наближеннi найближчих сусiдiв. На противагу вже вiдомим виразам, вiн представляє собою єдину формулу, справедливу на всьому iнтервалi енергiй. Також було перевiрено вiдповiднiсть уже вiдомим виразам i дослiджено граничнi випадки.
Ключовi слова: графен, густина станiв, сингулярнiсть Ван Гове
1 Introduction
A theoretical background of the electronic applications of graphene is based on the knowledge of its band structure. The vast majority of theoretical approaches exploit the fact that the low-energy quasiparticle excitations in graphene have a linear Dirac-like spectrum up to the energies of the order of eV. Widely used simple analytical expressions for the density of states (DOS), optical conductivity, etc., ultimately originate from this spectrum [1, 2, 3].
There are very few analytical results describing electronic properties of graphene beyond the continuum linear approximation. Among them there is an expression for the DOS provided by Hobson and Nierenberg in 1953 [4] without derivation. It appears in various forms in the modern literature (see e.g., review [2] and reference [5]). In particular, in [3] the DOS per unit cell and one spin component reads
[TABLE]
where the energy is measured in units of the nearest-neighbor hopping energy eV, the function is given by
[TABLE]
and is an elliptic integral of the first kind,
[TABLE]
We stress that the definition (1.3) corresponds to the notations of Wolfram Mathematica [6]. The definitions of the complete elliptic integrals, for example, in [7, 8, 9] employ the parameter as argument in place of the modulus , viz. . The purpose of the present brief report is to propose a more compact form of the DOS.
2 Derivation
For completeness, we recapitulate the main steps of the derivation that lead both to the new and old expressions for the DOS. We begin with the tight-binding dispersion law of graphene written in the nearest-neighbor approximation [10]
[TABLE]
where is the wave-vector and is the lattice constant with being the distance between the neighboring carbon atoms.
The DOS can be calculated as a trace of the imaginary part of the corresponding Green’s function [11]
[TABLE]
with
[TABLE]
The factor of in equation (2.2) originates from the trace over the sublattice degree of freedom and in equation (2.3) is the area of a unit cell. The integration is done over the Brillouin zone (our notations correspond to [1]). Introducing dimensionless variables and doubling the domain of integration to make it rectangular, and , one obtains
[TABLE]
with . Replacing we integrate over and obtain
[TABLE]
Equation (2.5) can be expressed in terms of an elliptic integral of the first kind (see equation (3.147.3) in [7])
[TABLE]
where for the brevity of notations we omitted in the argument. The argument of the elliptic function in equation (2.6) is imaginary for , but it is real and larger than 1 for . In the former case, , using the imaginary modulus transformation [9]
[TABLE]
we arrive at the fist line of equation (1.1). In the latter case, we use the relationship (see equation (8.128) in [7] and [9])
[TABLE]
where the sign in front of the imaginary term is chosen in accordance to imaginary shift . Then, the last term of equation (2.8) leads us to the second line of equation (1.1).
Using Landen’s transformation (see equation (8.126.3) in [7, 9] and [12])
[TABLE]
the DOS (1.1) can be represented in one line expression. Returning back to the Wolfram’s definition of the elliptic integral (1.3), we arrive at the final result of this report:
[TABLE]
Here, the argument of the elliptic integral is (see figure 1).
The unified result (2.10) can be made clearer in the following way. By using (2.6) and (2.7), the expression (2.2) for the DOS can be converted to the form
[TABLE]
valid for . The result (2.10) then straightforwardly follows from analytical properties of the Green function; this is due to the identity
[TABLE]
following from (2.9).
3 Conclusions
To conclude, we reproduce limiting cases of the DOS. The low-energy expansion of the DOS (2.10) is
[TABLE]
where the first term originates from the contribution of . One can see that the second term of the expansion is 100 times smaller than the first one for eV. Assuming that the Fermi velocity is , we reproduce the commonly used DOS per unit area and spin . Finally, near , the argument of the elliptic integral in equation (2.10) is . Assuming that for [6], we reproduce the asymptotic of the DOS near the van Hove singularity [4] .
Acknowledgements
We thank S.G. Sharapov for suggesting to reproduce the result of [4] in his lecture course on graphene and for providing a great help in writing the article. Also, we would like to thank O.O. Sobol for a helpful and productive discussion.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Gusynin V.P., Sharapov S.G., Carbotte J.P., Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 2007, 21 , 4611, doi: 10.1142/S 0217979207038022 . · doi ↗
- 2[2] Castro Neto A.H., Guinea F., Peres N.M.R., Novoselov K.S., Geim A.K., Rev. Mod. Phys., 2009, 81 , 109, doi: 10.1103/Rev Mod Phys.81.109 . · doi ↗
- 3[3] Katsnelson M.I., Graphene: Carbon in Two Dimensions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012.
- 4[4] Hobson J.P., Nierenberg W.A., Phys. Rev., 1953, 89 , 662, doi: 10.1103/Phys Rev.89.662 . · doi ↗
- 5[5] Rammal R., J. Phys., 1985, 46 , 1345, doi: 10.1051/jphys:019850046080134500 . · doi ↗
- 6[6] URL http://functions.wolfram.com/Elliptic Integrals/Elliptic K/ .
- 7[7] Gradshteyn I.S., Ryzhik I.M., Table of Integrals, Series and Products, Academic Press, New York, 1980.
- 8[8] Bateman H., Erdélyi A., Higher Transcendental Functions, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, 1953.
