Immediate deployment opportunities for negative emissions with BECCS: a Swedish case study
Henrik Karlsson, Timur Delahaye, Filip Johnsson, Jan Kj\"arstad and, Johan Rootz\'en

TL;DR
This paper assesses Sweden’s immediate potential for BECCS deployment, showing it could offset a significant portion of national emissions at current costs, highlighting a viable short-term negative emissions strategy.
Contribution
It identifies and quantifies Sweden's immediate BECCS deployment potential using existing bio-energy facilities, emphasizing its feasibility and cost benefits.
Findings
Potential for 20 Mt annual negative emissions in Sweden
Including BECCS in current incentives could save over 600 million euros annually
Sweden is well-positioned for immediate BECCS deployment
Abstract
To meet the 2{\deg}C target and, in particular the 1.5{\deg}C target defined in the Paris Agreement, rapid scaling-up of BECCS (Bio-Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage) and other negative emissions technologies (NETs) is essential. Recent research on BECCS has mainly focused on biophysical and sustainability limitations to multi-Gigatonne deployment in the latter half of this century. However, this paper focuses on the critical short-term opportunities for immediate deployment, considering solely existing bio-energy facilities in Sweden as a case study. We show that the immediate potential for BECCS in this country amounts to 20 Mt annually. This corresponds to 39% of total GHG emissions in 2014 in Sweden. The current costs for implementing BECCS at this level is compared to the present carbon taxes and other incentives. We show that including BECCS in the carbon tax incentive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Environmental Impact and Sustainability
