Comparing the Finite-Time Performance of Simulation-Optimization Algorithms
Naijia Dong, David J. Eckman, Matthias Poloczek, Xueqi Zhao, and Shane, G. Henderson

TL;DR
This paper empirically compares various simulation-optimization algorithms to understand their finite-time performance and how problem properties influence their effectiveness, aiming to guide future algorithm development.
Contribution
It provides a systematic empirical evaluation of algorithms' finite-time performance and analyzes the impact of problem characteristics on their effectiveness.
Findings
Performance varies with problem properties
Certain algorithms outperform others in specific scenarios
Insights guide future algorithm improvements
Abstract
We empirically evaluate the finite-time performance of several simulation-optimization algorithms on a testbed of problems with the goal of motivating further development of algorithms with strong finite-time performance. We investigate if the observed performance of the algorithms can be explained by properties of the problems, e.g., the number of decision variables, the topology of the objective function, or the magnitude of the simulation error.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSimulation Techniques and Applications · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Advanced Database Systems and Queries
