On codimension-1 submanifolds of the real and complex projective space
Beniamino Cappelletti Montano, Andrea Loi, Daniele Zuddas

TL;DR
This paper proves that certain product manifolds involving real projective spaces cannot be embedded in higher-dimensional real projective spaces under specific conditions, extending algebraic results to topological settings.
Contribution
It establishes a topological non-embedding result for products of closed orientable manifolds with real projective spaces, inspired by algebraic analogs.
Findings
Product manifolds with real projective spaces cannot be locally flat embedded in certain projective spaces for even dimensions.
The result generalizes algebraic embedding theorems to topological manifolds.
Provides new insights into the topology of projective space embeddings.
Abstract
Inspired by the analogous result in the algebraic setting (Theorem 1) we show (Theorem 2) that the product of a closed and orientable topological manifold with the -dimensional real projective space cannot be topologically locally flat embedded into for all even .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Geometry and complex manifolds · Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
On codimension-1 submanifolds of the real and complex projective space
Beniamino Cappelletti–Montano
Beniamino Cappelletti–Montano, Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica
Università di Cagliari, Italy.
,
Andrea Loi
Andrea Loi, Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica
Università di Cagliari, Italy.
and
Daniele Zuddas
Daniele Zuddas, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, School of Mathematics, 85 Hoegiro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02455, Republic of Korea.
Abstract.
Inspired by the analogous result in the algebraic setting (Theorem 1) we show (Theorem 2) that the product of a closed and orientable topological manifold with the -dimensional real projective space cannot be topologically locally flat embedded into for all even .
Key words and phrases:
codimension-1 embeddings; real and complex projective spaces; complex and topological manifolds; Grassmannians
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
32H02, 57N35
The first two authors were supported by Prin 2015 – Real and Complex Manifolds; Geometry, Topology and Harmonic Analysis – Italy. All the authors are members of INdAM-GNSAGA - Gruppo Nazionale per le Strutture Algebriche, Geometriche e le loro Applicazioni.
1. Introduction
Since the early papers of Whitney ([14]), Hirsch ([8]) and Smale ([12]), the theory of embeddings focused on the question whether a smooth manifold can be immersed / embedded into a Euclidean space. In particular, there are a number of results concerning the best immersion or embedding of a projective space of a given dimension into a Euclidean space, and, on the other hand, topological obstructions to such immersability in some dimensions have been found (see, for instance, [1], [2], [4], [10], [11]).
In last years the study of immersions has also fascinating interplays with other areas of mathematics. For instance, determining the smallest immersion dimension of a projective space into a Euclidean space is related to the study of robot motion planning [5].
Very few is known, so far, about embeddings into a projective space, a part of some results concerning the analytical and smooth embeddings of into [6] and the set of regular homotopy classes of codimension-1 immersions into [3].
One of the aims of this paper is a contribution in this direction. Namely, we are interested in codimension-1 embeddings into a projective space. Our motivation is given by the following result, in the category of complex manifolds (see next section for the proof).
Theorem 1.
Let be a compact complex manifold of complex dimension . There are no holomorphic embeddings of into for .
Here we ask if the previous theorem has a topological counterpart, by taking any closed, connected, orientable, topological manifold and by considering nonorientable, i.e. even dimensional, real projective spaces instead of complex projective spaces. The following theorem is a result in this direction.
Theorem 2.
Let be a closed, connected, orientable, topological manifold of dimension . There are no topologically locally flat embeddings of into for all even .
The paper is organized as follows. In the next section we prove Theorem 1 and Theorem 2. In the last one we show, by some counterexamples, that the above results do not hold by taking immersions instead of embeddings, and that the assumptions on the dimension of can not be relaxed. Of course the Segre embedding provides an example of codimension-1 embedding between projective spaces with , according to the notation of Theorem 1. However, in view of our results, one can ask if it exhausts all the embeddings of the product of projective spaces into a projective space. This will lead us to formulate a general conjecture on embeddings of Grassmannians.
2. Proof of the main results
In order to prove Theorem 1, we recall some basic facts of algebraic geometry, referring the reader to Section 1 and 2 of Chapter 1 in [7] for details and further results.
Let be a complex manifold of complex dimension . Any codimension-1 complex submanifold can be seen as a smooth divisor on . Recall that a divisor of is a locally finite formal linear combination , where the are irreducible holomorphic subvarieties of complex dimension (equivalently, can be described locally as zeros of a single holomorphic function). To each divisor on (and hence to any codimension-1 complex submanifold ) we can associate a holomorphic line bundle on (see [7, p.132]). A holomorphic line bundle over a compact complex manifold is said to be positive if there exists an integral Kähler form on representing the first Chern class of , i.e. , where denotes the second de Rham cohomology class of . One has the following celebrated theorem.
Lefschetz Hyperplane Theorem. Let be a compact complex manifold of complex dimension and let be a codimension-1 complex submanifold of such that the associated line bundle is positive. Then, the linear map
[TABLE]
induced by the inclusion is an isomorphism for and injective for .
We are now ready to prove our main theorems.
[Proof of Theorem 1] The proof is by contradiction. Suppose that there is a holomorphic embedding . Since all the divisors of are multiple of the hyperplane divisor , it follows that the holomorphic line bundle associated to the complex submanifold is positive. The assumptions and together with the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem for , yields the equality
[TABLE]
among the second Betti numbers. Using Künneth’s theorem and the fact that the second Betti number of the complex projective space is 1, we get
[TABLE]
yielding the desired contradiction since being an algebraic manifold.
[Proof of Theorem 2] Suppose, by contradiction, that there is a topologically locally flat embedding . We put and , where is fixed. Since is an embedding, we have and . Let be the universal covering map.
The preimage , being a closed codimension-1 locally flat submanifold of , is the boundary of a codimension-0 submanifold . Therefore, is orientable, and since is nonorientable because is even, it follows that is connected. We claim that the homomorphism
[TABLE]
induced by the inclusion , is an isomorphism.
To prove the claim, we consider the monodromy of the covering map given by the restriction , where is the symmetric group of two elements. Consider also the monodromy of the covering map . It is clear that , where is the homomorphism induced by the inclusion .
Let be any element, and let be the generator. A loop in that represents is orientation-reversing (which means that the parallel transport along this loop reverses the orientation of the tangent space at the base point, or, equivalently, that the tubular neighborhood of this loop in is a nonorientable manifold). On the other hand, since is orientable, every loop in is orientation-preserving (that is, its tubular neighborhood is orientable). Hence, a loop in that represents is orientation-reversing.
Since is orientable, every lifting of to cannot be a loop (otherwise the tubular neighborhood of in would map homeomorphically to the tubular neighborhood of by , which is impossible because of the nonorientability of the latter). This implies that is not the identity element of . In particular, for , , and so . Since , this proves the claim.
Now, we proceed with the proof of the theorem. The homology class of in
[TABLE]
is equal to zero because is disjoint from an isotopic copy of it, say for , while the generator of , that is the homology class of the standard , has non-zero self-intersection, given that .
Let be the generator. The fact that is an isomorphism between fundamental groups implies that in . Thus, in . On the other hand, because , being in . Having obtained a contradiction, we conclude the proof.
Corollary 3.
There are no smooth embeddings of into for every smooth, closed, orientable manifold of dimension and for every even .
3. Final remarks
The assumption in Theorem 1 cannot be relaxed. For example, admits a holomorphic embedding into by means of the Segre embedding, namely the map
[TABLE]
Nevertheless, we do not know if the hypothesis in Theorem 2 (still assuming even) can be dropped (cf. the proof given in the previous section). 2. 2.
Let us consider a smooth embedding of into constructed as follows. First, take an embedding , whose existence is guaranteed by Wall’s theorem [13]; then consider a compact tubular neighborhood of in . Since is orientable and the embedding is of codimension 2, it is well known [9, Chapter 11] that the normal bundle of in is trivial, hence , where denotes the -dimensional disk. By taking the boundary of , we then get an embedding of into . Finally, by composing this embedding with the inclusion of into as an affine chart one gets a smooth embedding . Similarly, starting from a suitable embedding of into (obtained by composing the previous one with the standard inclusion ), one can show that there exists a smooth embedding . These constructions show that the evenness of in Theorem 2 cannot be avoided. 3. 3.
The assumption in Theorem 2 cannot be weakened by considering immersions instead of embeddings. Indeed, (actually for any closed surface ) admits a smooth immersion into constructed as follows. Take an embedding and a -dimensional plane disjoint from ; then, the rotation of around generates an immersed copy of . By composing this immersion with the inclusion of into as an affine chart, one gets the desired immersion.
Notice that the proof of Theorem 1 easily extends by taking complex Grassmannians instead of projective spaces. Thus, we believe that Theorem 2 can be extended to nonorientable Grassmannians instead of projective spaces.
Actually, in view of this last observation and the first remark in this section, it makes sense to formulate the following more general conjecture.
Conjecture.
Let denote the Grassmannian of -planes in , for and . Then, the only codimension- smooth embedding
[TABLE]
is the Segre embedding
[TABLE]
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] P. Akhmet’ev and O. Frolkina, On non-immersibility of 𝐑 P 10 superscript 𝐑 P 10 \mathop{\mathbf{R}\mathrm{P}}\nolimits^{10} to 𝐑 15 superscript 𝐑 15 \mathbf{R}^{15} , Topology Appl. 160 (2013), 1241–1254.
- 2[2] P.F. Baum and W. Browder, The cohomology of quotients of classical groups , Topology 3 (1965) 305–336.
- 3[3] Banghe Li, On immersions of m 𝑚 m -manifolds into ( m + 1 ) 𝑚 1 (m+1) -manifolds , Math. Z. 182 (1983), 311–320.
- 4[4] D. Davis and V. Zelov, Some new embeddings and nonimmersions of real projective spaces , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 128 (2000), 3731–3740.
- 5[5] M. S. Farber, S. L. Tabachnikov and S. Yuzvinsky, Topological robotics: motion planning in projective spaces , Int. Math. Res. Not. 34 (2003), 1853–1870.
- 6[6] S. Feder, Immersion and embeddings in complex projective spaces , Topology 4 (1965), 143–158.
- 7[7] P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry , John Wiley and Sons Inc., 1978.
- 8[8] M. W. Hirsch, Immersions of manifolds , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 93 (1959), 242–276.
