The real plane Cremona group is a non-trivial amalgam
Susanna Zimmermann

TL;DR
The paper proves that the real plane Cremona group is a non-trivial amalgamated product of two groups and provides an alternative proof of its abelianisation, advancing understanding of its algebraic structure.
Contribution
It establishes the non-trivial amalgamated structure of the real plane Cremona group and offers a new proof of its abelianisation, contributing to algebraic geometry and group theory.
Findings
The real plane Cremona group is a non-trivial amalgam.
An alternative proof of its abelianisation is provided.
The group’s structure is clarified as an amalgamated product.
Abstract
We show that the real Cremona group of the plane is a non-trivial amalgam of two groups amalgamated along their intersection and give an alternative proof of its abelianisation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematics and Applications · Finite Group Theory Research · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
The real plane Cremona group is an amalgamated product
Susanna Zimmermann
Susanna Zimmermann
Laboratoire angevin de recherche en mathématiques (LAREMA)
CNRS
Université d’Angers
49045 Angers Cedex 1
France
Abstract.
We show that the real Cremona group of the plane is a non-trivial amalgam of two groups amalgamated along their intersection and give an alternative proof of its abelianisation.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
14E07; 20F05; 14P99
During this work, the author was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, by Projet PEPS 2018 JC/JC and by ANR Project FIBALGA ANR-18-CE40-0003-01.
1. Introduction
The plane Cremona group is the group of birational transformations of defined over a field . For algebraically closed fields , the Noether-Castelnuovo theorem [5] shows that is generated by and the quadratic map . It implies that the normal subgroup generated by is equal to . Furthermore, [4, Appendix by Cornulier] shows that is not isomorphic to a non-trivial amalgam of two groups. However, it is isomorphic to a non-trivial amalgam modulo one simple relation [1, 10, 8], and it is isomorphic to a generalised amalgamated product of three groups, amalgamated along all pairwise intersections [16]. For , the group is generated by and the two subgroups
[TABLE]
where [3, Theorem 1.1]. Over , the analogon of is conjugate to since a pencil of conics through four points in in general position can be sent over onto a pencil of lines through one point.
We define to be the subgroup generated by and , and by the subgroup generated by and . Then is generated by , and the intersection contains the subgroup generated by and the involution , which is contained .
Theorem 1.1**.**
We have , which is a proper subgroup of and and
[TABLE]
Moreover, both and have uncountable index in .
The action of on the Bass-Serre tree associated to the amalgamated product yields the following:
Corollary 1.2**.**
Any of algebraic subgroup of is conjugate to a subgroup of or of .
For the finite subgroups of odd order Corollary 1.2 can also be verified by checking their classification in [17]. An earlier version of this article used an explicit presentation of and of in terms of generators and generating relations, the first of which is proven in [18] and the second was proven analogously in the earlier version of this article. The present version does not use either presentation. Instead, we look at the groupoid of birational maps between rational real Mori fibre spaces of dimension . It contains as subgroupoid, is generated by Sarkisov links and isomorphisms and the elementary relations are a set of generating relations [11], see also Theorem 2.5. This information is encoded in a square complex on which acts [11], see also § 2. This allows us to moreover provide a new proof of the abelianisation theorem of given in [18, Theorem 1.1(1)&(3)]:
Theorem 1.3**.**
There is a surjective homomorphism of groups
[TABLE]
such that its restriction to is surjective and , where the right hand side is also equal to the normal subgroup generated by .
The proof of the main theorems rely on the description from [11] of elementary relations among so-called Sarkisov links, into which any real birational map of decomposes [9]. In higher dimension over , the decomposition result is due to [7] (and [6] for dimension ), and the description of elementary relations is generalised in [2], where the authors moreover deduce that for , the group is a non-trivial amalgamated product of uncountably many factors along their common intersection.
Acknowledgement: I would like thank Anne Lonjou for asking me whether the real plane Cremona group is isomorphic to a generalised amalgamated product of several groups, and the interesting discussions that followed. I would also like to thank Stéphane Lamy for discussions on the square complex, and Jérémy Blanc, Yves de Cornulier for helpful remarks, questions and discussions, and the referee for the very useful comments and suggestions.
2. A square complex associated to the Cremona group
In this section we recall the square complex constructed in [11].
By a surface , we mean a smooth projective surface defined over , and by the same surface but defined over . We define the Néron-Severi space as the space of -divisors , where is the numerical equivalence of divisors. The Galois group acts on and we denote by the subspace of the invariant classes. Since we only consider surfaces with and , is also the space of classes of divisors defined over (see for instance [14, Lemma 6.3(iii)]). The dimension of is called Picard rank of and is denoted by . We can identify with the space of -cycles defined over . For a surjective morphism defined over , we denote by the subspace generated by curves contracted by , and by the quotient of by the orthogonal of . We call the relative Picard rank of over .
If not stated otherwise, all morphisms are defined over , while curves and points contained in a real surface will be geometric curves and points, i.e. they are not necessarily defined over , but its -orbit is.
2.1. Rank fibrations and a square complex
Definition 2.1**.**
Let be a smooth projective real surface, a point or a curve and an integer. We say that a surjective morphism with connected fibres is a rank fibration if and the anticanonical divisor is -ample.
The last condition means that for any curve contracted to a point by , we have . The condition on the Picard number is that if is a point, and if . We may write instead of .
An isomorphism between two fibrations and is an isomorphism such that there exists an isomorphism on the bases that makes the following diagram commute:
[TABLE]
In particular, and are fibrations of the same rank.
The definition of a rank fibration puts together several notions. If is a point, then is a real del Pezzo surface of Picard rank . If is a curve, then is a conic bundle of relative Picard rank : a general fiber is isomorphic to a smooth plane real conic, and any singular fiber is the union of two -curves secant at one point. Remark also that being a rank 1 fibration is equivalent to being a (smooth) Mori fibre space of dimension .
Lemma 2.2**.**
Let be a rank fibration and assume that is rational.
- •
If , then is isomorphic to one of the following:
- (1)
, 2. (2)
, 3. (3)
* (the map is the second or first projection),* 4. (4)
, , 5. (5)
,
- •
If , then is isomorphic to or to the blow-up of a rank fibration in a real point of a pair of non-real conjugate points.
Proof.
The first statement is [3, Proposition 2.15]. Suppose that is a rank fibration. As , we can run the -invariant two rays-game over ; there exist exactly two morphisms with connected fibres and , , such that factors through each .
[TABLE]
If and are both curves, then as is rational, and and are rank fibrations. From the classification of rank fibrations, it follows that . Else, at least one of the is a surface, say , and is a birational morphism. If is a curve contracted by , then both the exceptional divisor of and the strict transform of are contracted by , hence . In particular, is a rank fibration. ∎
For a rational surface , we call marking on a rank fibration a choice of a birational map . We say that two marked fibrations and are equivalent if is an isomorphism of fibrations. We denote by an equivalence class under this relation.
If and are marked fibrations of respective rank and , we say that factorizes through if the birational map induced by the markings is a morphism, and moreover there exists a (uniquely defined) morphism such that the following diagram commutes:
[TABLE]
In fact if the last condition is empty, and if it means that is a morphism of fibration over a common basis . Note that .
We define a 2-dimensional complex as follows. Vertices are equivalence classes of marked rank fibrations, with . We put an oriented edge from to if factorizes through . If are the respective ranks of and , we say that the edge has type . For each triplets of pairwise linked vertices , , where (resp. , ) is a rank (resp. , ) fibration, we glue a triangle. In this way we obtain a 2-dimensional simplicial complex .
Lemma 2.3**.**
[11, Lemma 2.3]** For each edge in of type , there exist exactly two triangles that admit this edge as a side.
By gluing all the pairs of triangles along edges of type 3,1, and keeping only edges of types 3,2 and 2,1, we obtain a square complex that we still denote . When drawing subcomplexes of we will often drop part of the information which is clear by context, about the markings, the equivalence classes and/or the fibration. For instance must be understood as for an implicit marking and as .
2.2. Sarkisov links and elementary relations
In this section we recall from [11] that the complex encodes the notion of Sarkisov links (or links for short), and of elementary relation between them.
A Sarkisov link between two rank fibrations and is one of the following birational maps:
- •
Link of type I: , and is a blow-up of a real point or a pair of non-real conjugate points.
- •
Link of type II: and there exist two blow-ups of a real point or non-real conjugate points and over such that .
- •
A link of type III is the inverse of a link of type I, i.e. , and is the contraction of a real -curve or a pair of non-real conjugate -curves.
- •
Link of type IV: and curves and is the identity on . If is rational, then, by Lemma 2.2, , and are the projections on the first and second factor.
Let , be two marked rank 1 fibrations. The induced birational map is a Sarkisov link if and only if there exists a marked rank 2 fibration that factorizes through both and .
[TABLE]
Indeed, for links of type I and III we take , for links of type II we take , and for links of type IV, we take . Equivalently, the vertices corresponding to and are at distance 2 in the complex , with middle vertex .
A path of links from a rank fibration to another rank fibration is a path in from to that passes only through edges of type .
Proposition 2.4**.**
[11, Proposition 2.6]** Let be a marked rank 3 fibration. Then there exist finitely many squares in with as a corner, and the union of these squares is a subcomplex of homeomorphic to a disk with center corresponding to .
In the situation of Proposition 2.4, by going around the boundary of the disc we obtain a path of Sarkisov links whose composition is an automorphism. We say that this path is an elementary relation between links, coming from the rank fibration . More generally, any composition of links that corresponds to a loop in the complex is called a relation between Sarkisov links.
Theorem 2.5**.**
[11, Proposition 3.14, Proposition 3.15]**
- (1)
Any birational map between rank 1 fibrations is a composition of links and isomorphisms. In particular the complex is connected. 2. (2)
Any relation between links is generated by elementary relations, and in particular is simply connected.
The first part of Theorem 2.5 can also be found in [9, Theorem 2.5]. In fact, a relative version can be extracted from the classification of links in [9, Theorem 2.6].
Proposition 2.6**.**
Let be a curve and and two rank fibrations. Any birational map over is a composition of Sarkisov links of type II over . In particular:
- (1)
Let be blow-up of . Then any element of is a composition of isomorphisms and links of type II between Hirzebruch surfaces. 2. (2)
Let where is the link of type II blowing up and contracting the line passing through them, and is the blow-up of and . Then any element of is a composition isomorphisms of and links of type II.
2.3. Elementary discs
We call the disc with center a rank fibration from Proposition 2.4 an elementary disc. In this section, we classify them and therewith obtain an explicit list of elementary relations among rank fibrations.
Lemma 2.7**.**
Any edge of is contained in a square. In particular, is the union of elementary discs.
Proof.
Any edge of contains a vertex that is a rank fibration.
Suppose that is of type . From the two rays-game on we obtain an edge in of type attached to . This yields an edge of type , which, by Lemma 2.3, is contained in a square.
Suppose that is of type . We now produce an edge of type attached to , which will imply that is contained in a square as above by Lemma 2.3. If is a del Pezzo surface, then and so by Lemma 2.2, is the blow-up of or in at most four points and hence . Therefore, the blow-up of in a real point or a pair of non-real conjugate points in general position yields a del Pezzo surface and is a rank fibration. If is not a del Pezzo surface, it is the blow-up of a Hirzebruch surface , . The blow-up of in a real point or a pair of non-real conjugate points not contained in the same fibre nor in any singular fibre of yields a rank fibration . In any case, we have obtained an edge of type attached to .
By Proposition 2.4, any square is contained in an elementary disc, so is the union of elementary discs. ∎
Lemma 2.7 is not true in general for an arbitrary perfect field . Indeed, if has an extension of degree , then a Bertini involution whose set of base-points consists of one single Galois-orbit is a link of type II whose corresponding two edges in are not contained in any square [11, Lemma 4.3].
We now give some examples of elementary discs in and will then prove that our list is exhaustive. In what follows, is a del Pezzo surface of degree .
Example 2.8**.**
We now describe a *disc of type *1, pictured in Figure 2 Pick two general real points . The surface is isomorphic to and in , the two fibres through (resp. ) are a pair of non-real conjugate curves, whose union we denote by by (resp. ). Let be the blow-up of . Blowing up on yields morphisms . We can contract the strict transform of on onto a pair of non-real conjugate points in . By abuse of notation, we also denote by the strict transform on . On , and the exceptional divisor of are disjoint, and contracting first and then yields the square on the lower left. Analogously, we obtain the square on the right. Blowing up and in different order yields the middle square. The two fibrations lift to two fibrations . This yields the upper two squares. The curves , and the geometric components of and are the only -curves on . We have obtained a disc around the the rank fibration .
Remark 2.9**.**
The surface is obtained from by blowing up the pair of non-real conjugate points . It is a del Pezzo surface of degree and hence has six -curves. The conic bundle has exactly two singular fibres, each of which has exactly two components, which are conjugate -curves. The remaining two -curves is a pair of non-real conjugate sections of ; they are the exceptional divisors of the morphism blowing up .
The surface obtained by blowing up one real point on not contained in any -curve on is a del Pezzo surface of degree and inherits the conic bundle structure from . It can also be obtained by blowing up two pairs of non-real conjugate points on in general position: the surface contains ten -curves, namely the exceptional divisors of the four blown-up points and the strict transform of the lines passing through any two of them. The latter form two pairs of non-real conjugate lines and two real lines. Contracting one of the real -curves yields a birational morphism .
The surface obtained by blowing up a pair of non-real conjugate points in not contained in any -curve, is a del Pezzo surface of degree . It can be obtained by blowing up in three pairs of non-real conjugate points , , , not all contained on one conic, composed by the contraction the strict transform of the line passing through . The -curves on form eight pairs of non-real conjugate curves. Among them, the only curves which are disjoint from their conjugate are the images of the exceptional divisors of and the strict transform of the conics passing through and three of .
The surface obtained by blowing up two real points in has a similar discription to , and can be obtained by blowing up points on , no three collinear, and contracting the line through . Its sixteen -curves form seven pairs of conjugate curves and two real curves, the latter two being the strict transforms of the conics through and .
Example 2.10**.**
We describe a *disc of type *2, pictured in Figure 3. Pick two real points and on the conic bundle not contained in the same fibre. Let be the blow-up of and the blow-up of . Blowing up on and on yields morphisms and and the lower square. The rank fibration has exactly four singular fibres: the pre-image of the fibre containing , the pre-iamge of the fibre containing , and the pre-image of the two singular fibres of . We can contract the strict transforms of and of onto real points over . Contracting both yields a morphism and the remaining squares. By Remark 2.9, there are no other contractions from , and so we have obtained a disc around the vertex . An analogous construction can be made for two pairs of non-real conjugate points and , where no two of are on the same fibre, and for a real point and a pair of non-real conjugate points , no two of which are on the same fibre.
Example 2.11**.**
We describe a *disc of type *3, pictured in Figure 4. Pick two pairs of non-real conjugate points and in that are not collinear. Let be the blow-up of . The blow-up of on yields a morphism (see Remark 2.9). Blowing up and in different order yields the lower middle square. On , the strict transform of the line passing through is a real -curve and disjoint from the exceptional divisor of . Contracting and yields a birational morphism . The order of the contractions yields the lower left square. The contraction of preserves the conic bundle structure in , which yields the left upper square. We repeat the same construction with instead of and obtain the right side of the disc. The remaining complex -curves on are the strict transforms of the lines passing through one of each pair and . They form conjugate pairs of intersecting curves and hence cannot be contracted. We have thus obtained a disc around the the rank fibration .
Example 2.12**.**
We describe a *disc of type *4, pictured in Figure 5. Pick two pairs of non-real conjugate points and in in general position. Blowing up yields a morphism . Blowing up the points yields the birational morphism . Denote by the strict transform of the pair of non-real conjugate fibres of containing and . Its contraction yields a morphism to over . We have now obtained the two left squares in Figure 5. We can repeat the construction with instead of and obtain the right squares in Figure 5. The blow-ups of and commute, which yields the lower square. The upper square corresponds to the different orders of contraction of the disjoint pairs and . By Remark 2.9, there are no other contractions possible from , hence we have obtained a disc around the rank fibration .
Example 2.13**.**
We describe a *disc of type *5, pictured in Figure 6. Pick two real points . Let be the blow-up of . The pencil of lines in through induces the fibration , and the fibre containing is the strict transform of the line through and . The blow-up of induces a fibration , and the contraction of the strict transform of yields a morphism preserving this fibration. This yields the left half of the disc. Exchanging the roles of and yields the right half, with the fibration induced by the pencil of lines in passing through , and the lower middle square. The induced fibrations on are the two projections. On there are only three -curves, all of which are real curves, so our disc is complete.
Example 2.14**.**
A *disc of type *6 is constructed analogously to a disc of type 2, and is pictured in Figure 7, but by using the conic bundle , , instead of . As in Figure 3, the points and in Figure 7 refer to real points or pairs of non-real conjugate points. Moreover, we have (resp. ) if is a real point (resp. a pair of non-real conjugate points ) contained in the exceptional section of , and (resp. ) otherwise. The same holds for and instead of and , which yields the possible values of . In particular, there are only Hirzebruch surfaces in such a disc.
Proposition 2.15**.**
- (1)
Any elementary disc in is a disc of type 1, …, 6. 2. (2)
If two distinct elementary discs intersect, they do so either in exactly one vertex or in path of links. 3. (3)
A disc of type and a disc of type intersect in at most one vertex.
Proof.
The second and third claim follows from (1) and checking Exampes 2.8–2.10. Let be an elementary disc and pick one of its squares . It contains a unique vertex that is a rank fibration , which is one of the rank fibrations listed in Lemma 2.2. The edges in attached to correspond to blow-ups over of a real point or a pair of non-real conjugate points or to by Lemma 2.2. So, the square appears in a disc of type 1, …, 6. The disc contains a unique rank fibration, so it is the rank fibration contained in . It follows that is a disc of type 1, …, 6. ∎
3. The groups , and , and a quotient of
3.1. The group .
Recall that is the group generated by and the group of elements preserving the pencil of lines through . The group is the group generated by and the group of elements preserving the pencil of conics through the two pairs and .
We denote by the subgroup generated by and the quadratic involution . We have since .
Lemma 3.1**.**
Let . Then
- (1)
* if and only if there exists a path of links from to along discs of type 1, …, 4 avoiding any vertices of the form , .* 2. (2)
* if and only if there exists a path of links from to along discs of type 1, 5 and 6 avoiding any vertices of the form .* 3. (3)
* if and only if there is a path of links from to along discs of type 1.*
Proof.
(1) Let and write for some and . Let the birational map from Proposition 2.6(2). Then is a birational map of the conic bundle . The map corresponds to a path of links along discs of type 1, 3 and 4. By Proposition 2.6(2), decomposes into links of type II over , corresponds to a path of links along discs of type 2, 3, 4. So, there exists a path of links from to along discs of type 1, …, 4 as claimed.
Suppose there is a path of links from to along discs of type 1, …, 4 according to hypothesis. Then is the composition of links of type II or blowing up a pair of non-real conjugate points and contracting the line passing through them, or of type I or of type III . In particular, decomposes into automorphisms of and elements of , so is contained in .
(2) is shown analogously to (1) but now plays the role of , the elementary discs 1,5, 6 play the role of the elementary discs of type 1, 2, 3, 4, and the role of is played by the link of type 1 blowing up , which corresponds to a path of links in an elementary disc of type 1.
(3) The claim follows from the fact that has a decomposition into links corresponding to the path of links along a disc of type 1. ∎
Lemma 3.2**.**
We have .
Proof.
Let . By Lemma 3.1(1) there exists a path of links from to along discs of type 1, …, 4. By Lemma 3.1(2) there exists a path of links from to along discs of type 1, 5, 6. Running from to along and then returning to via yields a loop in at . By Theorem 2.5(2), is the boundary of a finite union of intervals and elementary discs. By Proposition 2.15, the elementary discs in the are discs of type 1, …, 6, and we colour them as follows: the ones of type 2, 3, 4 we colour blue, the ones of type 5, 6 we colour red and the ones of type 1 we colour purple. Vertices or edges contained in the intersection of two discs of different colour are coloured purple, which is consistent with the intersection properties of elementary discs by Proposition 2.15. By Lemma 3.1(3) it suffices to construct a purple path of links from to contained in . By Lemma 3.1(1)&(2), the path consists of red and purple intervals and consists of blue and purple intervals, so that is a union of purple intervals. The closure of is a finite union of discs intersecting pairwise in at most one vertex. We can assume that and do not contain any loops, so that intersections of the are vertices contained in , which are in particular purple. For , let be the union of red elementary discs in and the union of blue elementary discs in . Then is a non-empty finite set of vertices. Since is a disc, is covered by purple discs and has a connected component containing . ∎
3.2. The group
We denote by the quadratic map
[TABLE]
Recall that for any quadratic map with a pair of non-real conjugate base-points and one real base-point, there exist such that . Furthermore, if , then has one real and a pair of non-real conjugate base-points.
Remark 3.3**.**
Let be a curve and let be of degree . Let be the base-points of and denote by is the multiplicity of in a point . If is a curve, then
[TABLE]
If , then the sum in the last line is negative, which implies that there exists such that
[TABLE]
The same reasoning holds with instead of .
Lemma 3.4**.**
Any quadratic map in has a real and a pair of non-real base-points. In particular, the map is contained in , and so .
Proof.
Let be a quadratic map. We write , where with and of degree with exactly one real base-point and all other base-points non-real points; we can do this because is generated by and , and in a first step, we can take for all . For , we denote by the linear system of the map , and
[TABLE]
We now do induction on the lexicographically ordered pair . Note that , since , and that has at most two real base-points for any .
If , then and we are done. Suppose that . We will write , where with and of degree with exactly one real base-point and all other base-points non-real points, and such that the pair associated to the sequence is strictly smaller than .
If , then and so is of degree . If is linear, we replace in the composition by . The sequence has pair . If is of degree , it has one real and two non-real conjugate base-points, and the sequence has associated pair .
Suppose that . We denote by the multiplicity of in a point . Let (resp. ) be the real base-point of (resp. ).
(a) If , then then , and so and the map has exactly real base-point, namely the real base-point one of , and all its other base-points are non-real points. The sequence has associated pair .
(b) Suppose that . By Remark 3.3 applied to a general member of the linear system , there exist base-points (resp. ) of (resp. ) such that
[TABLE]
For , we can assume that and that is a point in or is infinitely near .
(b1) Suppose that . We first show that is a point in . If is infinitely near , then . We obtain from inequalities (1) that , which is impossible. So, is a point in . From inequalities (1) we obtain that
[TABLE]
It follows that the triples and are not collinear. Thus, there exist quadratic maps with base-points and , respectively. We have
[TABLE]
and we can write and for some and with only one real base-point and all other base-points real points. Furthermore, is a quadratic map with a real and a pair of non-real conjugate base-points, so we can write for some . The situation is summarised in the following commutative diagram, where is the linear system of , which is of degree , .
[TABLE]
The sequence has associated pair .
(b2) If we proceed analogously to the case (b1) with instead of . ∎
Lemma 3.5**.**
The group has uncountable index in .
Proof.
Consider the map and define the group
[TABLE]
Consider the map between sets , We now prove that it is injective, which will yield the claim. For all the map is of degree , and if and only if . If is of degree , it has three real base-points. Let such that . Then , and in particular , by Lemma 3.2. Lemma 3.4 implies that and hence . It follows that is injective. ∎
3.3. The group and a quotient of
Remark 3.6**.**
A link of type II of blowing up a pair of non-real conjugate points is conjugate via the birational map from Proposition 2.6(2) to an element of degree with three pairs of non-real conjugate base-points, not all on one conic.
Any two non-collinear pairs of non-real conjugate points in can be sent by an automorphism of onto . So, for any element of of degree with three pairs of non-real conjugate base-points not on one conic, there are such that . We call a standard quintic transformation. See [3, Example] or [13, §1] for equivalent definitions.
Lemma 3.7** ([18, Lemma 3.19]).**
Let , the birational map from Proposition 2.6(2) and a decomposition into links of type II as in Proposition 2.6(2). For , let be a (real or non-real) fibre of contracted by and its image in . We define if , and otherwise. Then
[TABLE]
is a surjective homomorphism of groups whose kernel contains all elements of of degree .
We now reprove [18, Proposition 5.3] by using the principle idea of [11] in the construction of a homomorphism over a perfect field .
Proposition 3.8**.**
The homomorphism lifts to a surjective homomorphism
[TABLE]
whose kernel contains .
Proof.
We denote by the set of birational transformations between rank fibrations. It is a groupoid and contains as subgroupoid, so it suffices to construct a homomorphism of groupoids
[TABLE]
whose restriction to its subgroup is and whose kernel contains .
Let be a link of type II over blowing up a pair of non-real conjugate points. Let and be the links from Proposition 2.6(2) and Then is a standard quintic transformation and we define . For any other link and any isomorphism we define . To show that is a homomorphism of groupoids, it remains to check that any relation between links and isomorphisms in is sent onto zero. Since is abelian, it suffices by Theorem 2.5(2) to check that elementary relations in are sent onto zero by . Let be an elementary relation in . We can assume that one of the is a link of type II of over with a pair of non-real conjugate base-points. The elementary relation corresponds to the boundary of an elementary disc in , and it is of type 2 or type 4 by Proposition 2.15 because one of the is a link of type II of over with a pair of non-real base-points.
If the disc is of type 2, then , , , and hence
[TABLE]
If the disc is of type 4, we can assume up to conjugation that are the links of type I in the relation. Up to automorphisms of (which are sent onto zero by ), we can furthermore assume that . Then , and hence also . We obtain that
[TABLE]
This shows that is a homomorphism of groupoids. By definition it coincides with on , and its kernel contains by Proposition 2.6(1). ∎
Corollary 3.9**.**
The group does not contain any standard quintic transformations. In particular, and the index of in is uncountable.
Proof.
Let be the homomorphism from Proposition 3.8. Its kernel contains and hence also . For any standard quintic transformation , we have by Remark 3.6, Lemma 3.7 and Proposition 3.8. It follows that . Moreover, induces a surjective map and hence the quotient is uncountable. ∎
4. Proofs of the main results
Proof of Theorem 1.1.
The group is generated by the groups and by [3, Theorem 1.1]. To show that is isomorphic to the amalgamated product , it suffices to show that any relation in is the composition of conjugates of relations in and relations in . By Theorem 2.5(2), any relation in is generated by conjugates of elementary relations of links. An elementary relation is the boundary of an elementary disc, which are of type 1, …, 6 by Proposition 2.15. The boundary of a disc of type 2, 3 and 4 is conjugate a relation in , the boundary of a disc of type 5 and 6 are conjugate to relations in , and the boundary of a discs of type 1 are conjugate to relations in by Lemma 3.1. We have by Lemma 3.2 and it is a proper subgroup of and by Lemma 3.4 and Corollary 3.9. The groups and have uncountable index in by Corollary 3.9. ∎
Theorem 1.3.
The homomorphism from Proposition 3.8 coincides with the one given in [18, Proposition 5.3] since their restriction to the generating set of coincide. The kernel of is computed in [18, §6] by using [18, §2–3] and is equal to and to the normal subgroup generated by . ∎
Proof of Corollary 1.2.
By Theorem 1.1, the group acts on the Bass-Serre tree of the amalgamated product . Every element of of finite order has a fixed point on . It follows that every finite subgroup of has a fixed point on [15, §I.6.5, Corollary 3], and is in particular conjugate to a subgroup of or of . For infinite algebraic subgroups of , it suffices to check the claim for the maximal algebraic subgroups of . By [12, Theorem 1.1], for any infinite maximal algebraic subgroup of there is a birational map , where is one of the surfaces in the list below and :
- (1)
, 2. (2)
, 3. (3)
, , 4. (4)
is a del Pezzo surface of degree with a birational morphism blowing-up a pair of non-real conjugate points. 5. (5)
is a del Pezzo surface of degree with a birational morphism blowing-up two real points on , 6. (6)
There is a birational morphism over of conic bundles blowing up pairs of non-real conjugate points on non-real fibres on the pair of disjoint non-real conjugate -curves of (the exceptional divisors of the contraction ), 7. (7)
There is a birational morphism of conic bundles blowing up points on the zero section of self-intersection .
(1)&(2)&(3) We have . The group is conjugate to a subgroup of , and for , the group is conjugate to a subgroup of .
(4) The surface contains exactly three pairs of non-real conjugate disjoint -curves. The group is generated by the lift of a subgroup of and two elements descending to birational maps of preserving one of the two fibrations [12, Proposition 3.5(2)&(3)]. So, is conjugate to a subgroup of .
(5) The surface contains exactly six real -curves. Via the blow-down of three disjoint -curves, the group is conjugate to a subgroup of .
(6) The group is generated by the lift of a subgroup of and by elements descending to birational maps of over [12, Propositio 4.5(1)&(2)]. So, is conjugate to a subgroup of .
(7) The group is generated by the lift of a subgroups of and by elements descending to birational maps of [12, Proposition 4.8(1)&(2)]. So, is conjugate to a subgroup of . ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] J. Blanc. Simple relations in the Cremona group. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 140(5):1495–1500, 2012.
- 2[2] J. Blanc, S. Lamy, and S. Zimmermann. Quotients of higher dimensional cremona groups. Preprint ar Xiv:1901.04145 , 01 2019.
- 3[3] J. Blanc and F. Mangolte. Cremona groups of real surfaces. In Automorphisms in birational and affine geometry , volume 79 of Springer Proc. Math. Stat. , pages 35–58. Springer, Cham, 2014.
- 4[4] S. Cantat and S. Lamy. Normal subgroups in the Cremona group. Acta Math. , 210(1):31–94, 2013. With an appendix by Yves de Cornulier.
- 5[5] G. Castelnuovo. Le trasformazioni generatrici del gruppo cremoniano nel piano. Atti della R. Accad. delle Scienze di Torino , (36):861–874, 1901.
- 6[6] A. Corti. Factoring birational maps of threefolds after Sarkisov. J. Algebraic Geom. , 4(2):223–254, 1995.
- 7[7] C. D. Hacon and J. Mc Kernan. The Sarkisov program. J. Algebraic Geom. , 22(2):389–405, 2013.
- 8[8] V. A. Iskovskikh. Proof of a theorem on relations in the two-dimensional Cremona group. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk , 40(5(245)):255–256, 1985.
