# Broadcasting in Noisy Radio Networks

**Authors:** Keren Censor-Hillel, Bernhard Haeupler, D. Ellis Hershkowitz, Goran, Zuzic

arXiv: 1705.07369 · 2017-05-23

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a noisy radio network model with random faults, analyzes the robustness of existing broadcast algorithms, and demonstrates that coding can significantly improve throughput under receiver faults.

## Contribution

It extends classical radio network models to include noise, adapts broadcast algorithms for robustness, and compares coding versus routing in noisy settings.

## Key findings

- Decay algorithm remains robust in noisy models
- Modified Gasieniec et al. algorithm achieves robustness
- Coding outperforms routing by a logarithmic factor under receiver faults

## Abstract

The widely-studied radio network model [Chlamtac and Kutten, 1985] is a graph-based description that captures the inherent impact of collisions in wireless communication. In this model, the strong assumption is made that node $v$ receives a message from a neighbor if and only if exactly one of its neighbors broadcasts.   We relax this assumption by introducing a new noisy radio network model in which random faults occur at senders or receivers. Specifically, for a constant noise parameter $p \in [0,1)$, either every sender has probability $p$ of transmitting noise or every receiver of a single transmission in its neighborhood has probability $p$ of receiving noise.   We first study single-message broadcast algorithms in noisy radio networks and show that the Decay algorithm [Bar-Yehuda et al., 1992] remains robust in the noisy model while the diameter-linear algorithm of Gasieniec et al., 2007 does not. We give a modified version of the algorithm of Gasieniec et al., 2007 that is robust to sender and receiver faults, and extend both this modified algorithm and the Decay algorithm to robust multi-message broadcast algorithms.   We next investigate the extent to which (network) coding improves throughput in noisy radio networks. We address the previously perplexing result of Alon et al. 2014 that worst case coding throughput is no better than worst case routing throughput up to constants: we show that the worst case throughput performance of coding is, in fact, superior to that of routing -- by a $\Theta(\log(n))$ gap -- provided receiver faults are introduced. However, we show that any coding or routing scheme for the noiseless setting can be transformed to be robust to sender faults with only a constant throughput overhead. These transformations imply that the results of Alon et al., 2014 carry over to noisy radio networks with sender faults.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.07369/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.07369/full.md

## References

38 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.07369/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.07369