# Machine learning for classification and quantification of monoclonal   antibody preparations for cancer therapy

**Authors:** Laetitia Le, Camille Marini, Alexandre Gramfort, David Nguyen, Mehdi, Cherti, Sana Tfaili, Ali Tfayli, Arlette Baillet-Guffroy, Patrice Prognon,, Pierre Chaminade, Eric Caudron, Bal\'azs K\'egl

arXiv: 1705.07099 · 2017-06-01

## TL;DR

This study develops a rapid, noninvasive Raman spectroscopy-based machine learning method for quality control of monoclonal antibody preparations in cancer therapy, achieving high accuracy in classification and quantification.

## Contribution

It introduces a collaborative data analytics workflow combining Raman spectroscopy and machine learning for antibody quality assessment, significantly reducing prediction errors.

## Key findings

- Misclassification rate of 0.8%
- Mean error rate of 4%
- Effective collaboration platform used for model optimization

## Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies constitute one of the most important strategies to treat patients suffering from cancers such as hematological malignancies and solid tumors. In order to guarantee the quality of those preparations prepared at hospital, quality control has to be developed. The aim of this study was to explore a noninvasive, nondestructive, and rapid analytical method to ensure the quality of the final preparation without causing any delay in the process. We analyzed four mAbs (Inlfiximab, Bevacizumab, Ramucirumab and Rituximab) diluted at therapeutic concentration in chloride sodium 0.9% using Raman spectroscopy. To reduce the prediction errors obtained with traditional chemometric data analysis, we explored a data-driven approach using statistical machine learning methods where preprocessing and predictive models are jointly optimized. We prepared a data analytics workflow and submitted the problem to a collaborative data challenge platform called Rapid Analytics and Model Prototyping (RAMP). This allowed to use solutions from about 300 data scientists during five days of collaborative work. The prediction of the four mAbs samples was considerably improved with a misclassification rate and the mean error rate of 0.8% and 4%, respectively.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.07099/full.md

## Figures

12 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.07099/full.md

## References

22 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.07099/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.07099