Note on the Number of Finite Groups of a Given Order
A. R. Ashrafi, E. Haghi

TL;DR
This paper investigates the number of non-isomorphic finite groups of a given order, providing new proofs for cases where there are 2 such groups and solving the case where there are 3.
Contribution
It offers a novel proof for the case of exactly two finite groups of a given order and solves the problem for exactly three groups, advancing understanding of group classification.
Findings
New proof for G(n) = 2 case
Solution to G(n) = 3 case
Enhanced understanding of finite group enumeration
Abstract
Let be a positive integer and denote the number of non-isomorphic finite groups of order . It is well-known that if and only if , where and denote the Euler's totient function and the greatest common divisor of and , respectively. The aim of this paper is to first present a new proof for the case of and then give a solution to the equation of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnalytic Number Theory Research · Finite Group Theory Research · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Note on the Number of Finite Groups of a Given Order
**A. R. Ashrafi111Corresponding author (Email: [email protected]). and E. Haghi
Department of Pure Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences,
University of Kashan, Kashan 8731753153, I. R. Iran**
Abstract
Let be a positive integer and denote the number of non-isomorphic finite groups of order . It is well-known that if and only if , where and denote the Euler’s totient function and the greatest common divisor of and , respectively. The aim of this paper is to first present a new proof for the case of and then give a solution to the equation of .
Keywords: Finite group, cyclic number, abelian number, square-free order group.
2010 AMS Subject Classification Number: .
1 Introduction
Throughout this paper all groups are assumed to be finite. The function and denote the number of non-isomorphic finite groups of order and the number of positive integers such that and , respectively. For any other notation not defined here, we refer the reader to [2, 11]. Our calculations are done with the aid of GAP [13].
The problem of finding exact value of in general seems to be very difficult, but there are some very good estimations for this function in literature. M. R. Murty and V. K. Murty [9], used this well-known fact that groups of square-free order are supersolvable to prove that for a square free number , .
Dickson determined those positive integers for which every group of order is abelian. As a consequence of his result it can be proved that if and only if . We encourage the interested readers to consult papers [4, 8] for a simpler proof of Dickson’s result. This result is our motivation to study the equation , for some small values of . In an exact phrase,
Question 1.1
For which positive integers does ? For which does ?
This paper will be concerned with Question 1.1. For the sake of completeness, we mention here some results which are crucial throughout this paper.
Given a group of square-free order greater than 1, a theorem of Hlder [6] tells us that is metacyclic. If , where are primes then
[TABLE]
where the summation is taken over all the subsets of and is the number of differences , which are divisible by . If we define , then one can see that
[TABLE]
where and are primes, see [1] for details.
Suppose is a finite group and is a normal subgroup such that and , where is a positive integer. Then is called a normal complement for . In [5, p. 252], the following result is proved:
Theorem 1.2
(Burnside’s Transfer Theorem). Let be a finite group and be a Sylow subgroup of . If then has a normal complement.
Suppose and define . Redei [12, Satz 10], characterized the positive integers with this property that all abelian groups of order are abelian. Such a positive integer is called an abelian number. He proved that:
Theorem 1.3
* is an abelian number if and only if , for each , .*
In the same manner, we call a positive integer a nilpotent number if every group of order is nilpotent. Pakianathan and Shankar [10], proved that a positive integer , ’s are distinct primes, is a nilpotent number if and only if , for all integers and with .
In this paper, our interest is the study of the function . The main result of this paper is as follows:
Theorem 1.4
Suppose .
* if and only if one of the following are hold:*
- (a)
* and ;* 2. (b)
, is square-free and there is a unique pair such that ; 3. (c)
, , and for each such that , we have ; and for each , , . 2. 2.
* if and only if one of the following are hold:*
- (a)
, is square-free and there is a unique triple such that and ; 2. (b)
, , and for each such that , we have ; and there exists a unique positive integer , such that .
2 Proof of Main Result
The aim of this section is to prove our main results. At first, we note that there are exactly five groups of order , where is prime. It is well-known that , , , and are all groups of order eight and if is an odd prime then , and are only abelian groups of order and there are exactly two non-abelian groups of this order as follows:
, 2. 2.
.
This proves that . The number of groups of order , and are primes, are recorded in Table 1. This table is first appeared in the famous book of Burnside [2].
Table 1. The Number of Groups of Order , and are primes.
[TABLE]
Suppose is prime and . The Frobenius group can be presented as follows:
[TABLE]
where is an element of order in the unit group of the ring , [7, p. 290].
2.1 The Case that .
Suppose , where . If there exists such that then there are five non-isomorphic finite groups of order . This shows that we have at least five groups , where is a group of order . Also, if there are and , and then
[TABLE]
are four non-isomorphic finite groups of order which is not possible. Thus, is square-free or is a cube-free number such that there exists exactly one prime number such that . If is square-free number then by Equation (1), there exists only one pair such that , as desired. So, we can assume that is a cube-free number such that there exists exactly one prime number such that . Since and are two non-isomorphic abelian group of order , every group of order has to be abelian. By Theorem 1.3, the condition in Theorem 1.4 is satisfied.
Note that if there are only two finite groups of order then is primes, but the converse is not generally correct. To see this, it is enough to check that and .
2.2 The Case that .
In this case the finite groups with will be characterized. By the proof of Theorem 1.4(1), such a number is square-free or it is a cube-free integer that there exists a unique prime number such that . Our main proof will consider two different cases as follows:
, , is square-free. By Equation (1), there are exactly two pairs and such that and .
- (a)
* and *. In this case, by Equation (1), there are exactly finite groups of order , which is a contradiction. 2. (b)
* and *. Under this conditions there are four groups , , and are four non-isomorphic groups of order , which is impossible. 3. (c)
. By Equation (1), there are exactly three finite groups of order , as desired. 2. 2.
, where ’s are distinct prime integers and . Suppose there are and , , such that . Then there are four non-isomorphic groups as follows:
[TABLE]
which is not possible. If there exists , , such that or then by Table 1, there are at least four groups of order leads again to a contradiction. We now assume that the prime integers are satisfied the condition in Theorem 1.4. Choose to be the Sylow subgroup of and . Since , and by Burnside’e transfer theorem has a normal subgroup of order = . By Part (1) of this theorem, or . Since
[TABLE]
and , there exists a unique homomorphism from into . This homomorphism has to be trivial. On the other hand, , and all Sylow subgroups of are cyclic. This shows that all subgroups of order are conjugate in . If and are two non-trivial homomorphism from into then . Therefore, there are three groups of order which can be presented as semi-direct product by the following homomorphism:
[TABLE]
Here, and are two elements of order in the groups and , respectively.
This completes the proof.
3 Concluding Remarks
In this paper the equation is considered into account. In the case that , we present a new proof for an old result of M. R. Murty and V. K. Murty. Then we continue the pioneering work of these authors to solve the equation . We check also the case for , but the problem for this case is so difficult. So, the complete solution of is a problem for future.
Acknowledgement. The research of the authors are partially supported by the University of Kashan under grant no 364988/101.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] J. Alonso, Groups of square-free order, an algorithm, Math. Comput. 30 (1976) 632–637.
- 2[2] W. Burnside, Theory of Groups of Finite Order 2d ed. Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1955.
- 3[3] L. E. Dickson, Definitions of a group and a field by independent postulates, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 6 (1905) 198–204.
- 4[4] J. A. Gallian and D. Moulton, When is ℤ n subscript ℤ 𝑛 \mathbb{Z}_{n} the only group of order n 𝑛 n ?, Elem. Math. 48 (1993) 117–119.
- 5[5] D. Gorenstein, Finite Groups , Harper & \& Row, New York, 1968.
- 6[6] O. H o ¨ ¨ o \ddot{\rm o} lder, Die gruppen mit quadratfreier Ordnungzahl, Nachr. K o ¨ ¨ o \ddot{\rm o} nigl. Ges. Wiss. G o ¨ ¨ o \ddot{\rm o} ttingen Math.-Phys. K 1 (1895) 211–229.
- 7[7] G. Games and M. Liebeck, Representation and Characters of Groups , Cambridge University Press, Cambtidge, 2001.
- 8[8] D. Jungnickel, On the uniqueness of the cyclic group of order n 𝑛 n , Amer. Math. Monthly 99 (6) (1992) 545–547.
